Australia’s going to vote on whether to poison itself with “gay marriage,” and, as always seems to happen, the power elite have hopped aboard the Sodomy Express and are now doing everything in their power to make sure the vote goes “Yes.”
Again, as always happens, the “Yes” side musters a powerful argument consisting of abuse, threats, name-calling, and sometimes violence: very powerful rhetorical tools.
So when the “No” side made an ad featuring some of the dirt the Yessies have been throwing at them, that ad was banned from Australian TV…”due to its contents”! (http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2017/09/30/-no–ad-banned-from-afl-air-time.html)
Let’s see if we can unpack this, um, reasoning. It’s okay for the Yessies to spout abuse and threats–like, it’s for a good cause? is that it?–but it would be hateful or something to let the public see and hear what the Yessies are doing. Calling someone a “homophobic maggot” and saying “I hope someone kicks your teeth in” is just fine, but reporting such comments is like, y’know, beyond the pale.
I hope I’ve cleared that up for you.
The fun will really start when they have to decide who gets to rule the rubble that used to be Western civilization: radical Islam, Organized Sodomy, or the sleazy leftid politicians who used the other two to get themselves more power. My money’s on the jihadis to pitch their competitors off the roots of tall buildings.
Unless the Lord Our God first intervenes.
They’ll be so very sorry. The road from there is a one way street to hell. Hopefully they’ll see what’s happened to this nation and repent of even the thought!
Let’s face it, it’s going to play out just as it did here. And if by some miracle it doesn’t they will just make them vote again until they get it “right”, like they did with California’s Prop 8, or they will just ignore the will of the people like they have done in so many states here.
“Again, as always happens, the “Yes” side musters a powerful argument consisting of abuse, threats, name-calling, and sometimes violence: very powerful rhetorical tools.”
All they have is an emotional argument, so they must rely on ad hominem and pejorative attacks. Otherwise they wouldn’t have anything. But then coercion and peer pressure have always been effective tools.
I see it as inevitable.
It reminds me of Leftids like Hillary, who has a filthy mouth, making self-righteous responses to Trump calling Kapernick a “son-of-a-bitch.” The language of the Leftids comes straight from the pits of hell.
I’d love to see video of her behavior on Election Night–by all accounts, a towering display of drunkenness, profanity, and throwing things. Somewhere that video exists. But of course whoever released it would be murdered, toot-sweet.
I’d love to see it. I’ll bet it was something to behold.