A friend posted on my chess page yesterday a news article about some famous model who posed with her four-year-old son done up in a pink dress and lady’s makeup, with the noozies cheerleading it all the way. I haven’t the heart to post a link to it.
If the sleep of reason breeds monsters, as Goya once said, the sleep of organized Christianity has bred whole herds of monsters. Our culture is rapidly becoming a 24/7 freak show.
I’m still waiting for an answer to this question: Why is teaching boys to be girls, and girls to be boys, any kind of good idea? What are we supposed to gain from this, besides confusion?
Oh Lord our God! Please remember, when you judge this age, that these things are done without our consent, against our will, and over our objections.
That’s a great question; what is to be gained? I know that there is such a thing as gender dysphoria and I have compassion for anyone dealing with it. But compassion doesn’t mean I’m going to encourage someone towards gender dysphoria.
What percentage of those cases are, shall we say, culture-spawned–and not real?
That’s a great question.
Another question, why is teaching boys to be girls (or vice versa) better than teaching a boy to be a boy? And how does it anyway benefit society? Your right Lee, it does nothing but cause confusion. There’s a reason why men historically did the hunting and fighting, and women reared the children. It wasn’t some social construct as they believe, it was the norm in every culture on earth, because those roles compliment our biology.
How sick and twisted the world has become