Canada Supreme Court: ‘Woman’ a ‘Problematic’ Term

1,597 Funny Judge Stock Photos, High-Res Pictures, and ...

Crazy is as crazy does.

Now they’re packing transgender madness into court cases–here, a sexual assault case– in which no trannies are involved. The Supreme Court of Canada did it just last week.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/supreme-court-decision-say-word-woman-is-confusing-unfortunate#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20of%20Canada,%E2%80%9Cperson%20with%20a%20vagina.%E2%80%9D

According to one of the, er, “justices” [just call ’em “crazies” and be done with it], the word “woman” is “confusing” and “problematic” and should not be used: say “person with a vagina” instead.

Is there something about a woman that these Far Left wacko judges–most of whom themselves are women–intensely dislike, and want to get rid of?

This was among the nooze stories that I refused to mention during Easter weekend. It’s like the Devil was working overtime this year.

6 comments on “Canada Supreme Court: ‘Woman’ a ‘Problematic’ Term

  1. If the pathetic nut cases don’t understand the universal designation woman, find a nut house
    for them and leave them there until they learn. GREAT SCOTT!

  2. In Canada, our judges are appointed by the government. Which may be better that elected judges, which just makes them politicians with even less accountability, but it also allows for judges to be picked for ideological reasons – and once they’re in, they’re pretty much in for life.

    For our Supreme Court to have been stacked by such imbeciles already, though… plus the RCMP, etc., it’s no wonder our Prime Dictator has been able to get away with so much, and not be charged for any of it.

  3. A study in women winning the same rights of men is a long history of great struggle and inspiration. Today’s women are throwing all that away over conceding to the-gender ideology that only is a miniscule part of the nation’s population. As George Orwell put it in his novel “1984” 2+2=5.

Leave a Reply to Erlene TalbottCancel reply