Tag Archives: liberals vs. the human race

Massachusetts Town OKs Polyamory

White-breasted Nuthatch Identification, All About Birds, Cornell ...

No, I’m not going to post a picture of a polyamorous “relationship.” Here’s a nice little bird instead.

R.J. Rushdoony used to say the only freedom statists mean to leave us is the freedom to fornicate–and that only because they want to wipe out the family, which competes with the state for an individual’s loyalty. He was right.

Speaking of America’s national character sliding down the pipe to the trash heap down below, the small city of Somerville, Massachusetts (pop. 80,000), has approved polyamory. That’s when a group of people have random sexual relations and call themselves a family. Feh. (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/01/us/somerville-polyamorous-domestic-partnership.html) They’ve redefined “domestic partnerships” to include groups of three or more persons living together as a sexual oddity.

Now public employees there can get local government health benefits if there are more than two people in the “partnership.” Members of these aggregations can now visit each other in the hospital–a change that could easily have been made without approving polyamory. But this is only to be expected from a town that flies Organized Sodomy’s “rainbow flag” from City Hall.

Family, schmamily, everything’s a family because you are whatever you call yourself. Two men, two women, a dog, and a manual typewriter can all themselves a “family.” Just another thing for our country to be ashamed of.


‘Obama: God Supports Transgender Rights’ (2016)

See the source image

The worst ever… so far

Ex-President *Batteries Not Included has crept out from under his rock to support his corrupt and wacky ally, Joe Biden, in this year’s presidential election.

This post is a reminder of what we had to endure, the last time we let Democrats run the country.

Obama: God Supports Transgender Rights

But of course they’ve now had four more years to deepen and intensify their transgender mania; so if they win this time, what has gone before will seem like nothing. This time they do not intend for our republic to survive. This time they mean to destroy our culture and break what’s left of our Christianity.

Anything but a vote for Donald Trump will help them do it.


‘So What is Justice?’ (2017)

Image result for images of justice store

Well, liberals have had three more years to batter the word “justice” into total meaninglessness. It’s become a synonym for whatever they happen to want at the moment.

So What Is Justice?

It’s also a store where you can buy sweaters and pajamas for girls in their early teens. There’s a whole chain of these. How “justice” has anything to do with sequinned teddy-tops is a mystery to me.

But my challenge stands. Go ahead, try it: ask any teen to define “justice.”

Our public education system has succeeded spectacularly in making people dumb enough to be dominated by nearly brainless liberals.


Is Chess Racist?

THE SEVENTH SEAL (Ingmar Bergman, 1958) A Knight's Despair ...

They’re as crazy Down Under as they are up here.

Taxpayer-funded Australian public radio, ABC, recently tried to open a discussion about chess being “racist” because White moves first, blah-blah (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/24/taxpayer-funded-radio-debate-chess-is-racist-because-white-moves-first/). The first Australian chess official they tried to rope in declined to appear, so they got someone else to try to defend something that doesn’t really need defending and anyway who’s listening? Everything is racist! Case closed!

You can’t even play chess anymore without getting nagged by race-obsessed stupid white liberals. They drag it into everything.

This has begun to resemble full-blown mental illness. Again we ask–do they want to ban everything? How about vanilla ice cream? White paint? Paper towels? Where does it stop?

I don’t think they know. Do you?


‘Calling Evil Good’ (2014)

See the source image

Not really…

Did I say they were calling evil good in 2014? Well, yeah, obviously they were. But it seems like almost nothing, compared to now. We’ve sunk a lot deeper into the mire in six years.

Calling Evil Good

An anecdote about Abraham Lincoln crossed my mind.

Lincoln was contending with the members of his cabinet on some point or other, and challenged them with a rhetorical question: “How many legs would a sheep have, if you called the tail a leg?”

“Five!” answered the Secretary of War.

“Wrong,” said Lincoln, “he’d still have only four. Because calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it one.”

And calling a man a woman doesn’t make him one–no matter how many times you do it.

Why We Need Mandates

People Wearing Mask Images, Stock Photos & Vectors | Shutterstock

Sheeple… who need sheeple…

I was talking with a neighbor yesterday who kinda likes the mandatory face masks and all the other mandates. She is a liberal.

Mandates handed down from the top are much better than laws enacted by our chosen representatives after public debate, she explained, because “laws just take too long.” And we wouldn’t need mandates, she said, “if people would just do the right thing,” so we have the mandates “to make them behave.”

Dude! Where’s my adulthood? Did I suddenly become six years old again? All we all just toddlers with drivers’ licenses?

This sorry business with the face masks and the mandatory shunning each other has got to stop and never be allowed to happen again. The politicians responsible for it must be voted out of office, never to return. Too bad we can’t vote the nooze media out.

Are Our ‘Health Officials’ Quite All There?

Napkins 33x33 cm - Happy Puppies by Wimmel Napkins

We’re gonna need the happy puppies for this one.

Let’s see… We’ve got this pandemic, so we can’t have a family picnic to celebrate Grandma’s birthday, we can’t go to church, our kids can’t go to school… Because our expert “health officials” have told us that all such gatherings are “non-essential” and we have to preserve “social distancing” or else COVID-19 will wipe us out…

But now they’re telling us it’s okay to get together for a riot?

Well, yeah: that’s what they’re telling us (https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/04/public-health-protests-301534). Only of course they won’t say “riot.” It’s all just “mass protest.”

A quote from just one of these wackos, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins, will serve for all:

“In this moment the public health risks of not protesting to demand an end to systemic racism greatly exceed the harms of the virus.” So if thousands of the demonstrators get sick–oh, well, it was worth it. Right?

“Systemic racism?” Yeah. That’s that thing they invented to take the place of real racism after it had mostly passed away. Because “systemic racism” is unconscious, it’s supposedly part of our makeup whether we like it or not, we’re all guilty and never mind a trial, and it’s largely vague and undefined anyway, “systemic racism” is tailor-made for the racial grievance industry, which does not want to lose its job.

These are the “science” wiz kids. We’re supposed to believe them, always, no matter what kind of daft crapola they unload on us.

“Science” is at risk of becoming nothing more than window-dressing for politics–if it hasn’t become that already.

Their “science” is mere politics, and these people have to be utterly defeated if our country is to survive.

Minneapolis to ‘Disband’ Police?

Minnesota activating 1,000 additional soldiers to contain ...

Well, the crazy bastards look like they’re really going to go ahead and do it: abolish their city’s police department and replace the officers with assorted “experts” (http://www.citypages.com/news/minneapolis-city-council-members-consider-disbanding-the-police/570993291). So the next time someone in Minneapolis runs amok with a machete… call a social worker.

Yes, the Minneapolis City Council, apparently oblivious to the riots tearing apart their city, has actually agreed to get to work on replacing armed police officers with unarmed “experts” and programs “that stop crimes from happening in the first place.” Oh, boy, programs! People commit crimes because they need more programs!

Honk if you’ve heard this before. Anyway, say the city councilors, “the Police Dept. is not reformable.”

They get on their Twitter pages posing in their stupid face masks. And none of them has entertained the question of when and under what circumstances would there be a rather urgent need for the use of force.

This is crazy-nitwit liberal ideology from way back. Libs have spent years calling for the abolition of police. In January of this year, Seattle Democrat politicians called for the abolition of police. In 2018 “Chelsea” Manning ran for the U.S. Senate on a platform of abolishing prisons and police. In 2014, in the New York City Thanksgiving Day parade, marchers carried signs calling for the abolition of police. So this is something that liberals have been dreaming about for years; and now, they think, it’s time for them to make it happen.

No one mentioned that bad cops are energetically defended and kept on the job by the public employees’ union representing the police. Getting rid of the union would solve a lot of problems: but don’t hold your breath waiting for anyone in Minneapolis even to suggest that.

All of these urban hell-holes are governed and fed upon by Democrats. In most of them there has been no meaningful Republican presence for years.

And now, having turned their cities into schiff, they want a crack at governing the country.

Any vote for any Democrat is a vote against America.

France Goes Full-Throttle for Censorship

Censorship Concept In French With A Mouth Closed With An Adhesive ...

How’s this for a deal? Get private companies, mostly American-owned, to act as unpaid thought police… for France! (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16057/france-free-speech)

France has a new law aimed at ridding the Internet of “hate speech.” The law makes search engines and social networks–again, mostly American-owned–responsible for removing any kind of “hate speech” that anyone in France posts on the Internet.

Private companies will have just 24 hours to delete “hateful” comments or video, and one hour to delete “terrorist content.” Failure to do so will be punished with extremely high fines.

So what is all this “hate speech”? It’s any speech “inciting or glorifying terrorism, hate, violence or racist or religious abuse.” The actual definition is, shall we say, murky.

So you’re French and you post something about, say, adultery being a sin–which of course it is–and some American company, say, Twitter, decides unilaterally that your comment is “hateful” and takes action against you. Can you appeal it? Lots of luck with that! And the fines are so high, private companies are going to have to develop quick trigger fingers–they won’t want to cough up 4% of their yearly earnings.

What if you say “Such-and-such is a false religion”? Richard Dawkins et al say that about Christianity every day. Will they be silenced? Dream on. What if you say “White people are to blame for everything that’s wrong, and they should be dealt with harshly”? American college professors say that every day. Will they be censored? Don’t hold your breath waiting for that.

But say a discouraging word about “transgender” wackos and see what happens. Only the Left’s Cherished Minorities actually get cherished. The rest of us are always fair game.

These American companies habitually censor conservatives while giving assorted leftids a total free pass. They won’t mind censoring French conservatives, too. And wherever “hate” gets morphed into “social justice,” there won’t be any censorship.

Despite their historical flirtation with “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” France has an awful lot to learn about free speech. They never have quite mastered it.

And now they’ve given up trying to.

Evil Notions Never Die

George Bernard Shaw | Getty Images Gallery

George Bernard Shaw, acclaimed as one of the wisest and cleverest men of the 20th century, never met a dictatorship he didn’t like and cheer for. Here’s a little something he had to say in 1931–before Hitler really got rolling, but by then Shaw was already in love with Stalin and Mussolini.

“You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth. Just put them there [in front of a special government board] and say Sir, or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? If you can’t justify your existence, if you’re not pulling your weight in the social boat, if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more, then, clearly, we cannot use the organizations of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.” (https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/1074477-you-must-all-know-half-a-dozen-people-at-least)

Hmm… I wonder how Jeffrey Epstein would have “justified” himself? Betcha anything the government board would’ve given him a pass. He’d pay good money for it.

How about the board members themselves? Could they justify their existence? I’d love to hear that speech!

You had Shaw and Hitler and the whole pseudo-Settled Science of eugenics, we had the death panels in Obamacare, and you know none of it has gone away, it’s always there, waiting for the right Party or dictator to come along and put it into practice. Or it could be a lofty Scientific Panel: who would argue with them?

This is doing things man’s way, not God’s way. We love to tell each other, these days, “Stay safe!” As if there were any safety at all in leaving matters up to the “experts” who got us into these messes in the first place.

There is no safety anywhere outside of God’s way.


%d bloggers like this: