Democrat ‘Purity Tests’–Enough, Already

See the source image

Eat your heart out, Stan Laurel–this is a comedian! I wonder what kind of purity test he’d be able to pass. Feel free to speculate.

Now we’ve got a Trump-hating U.S. Senator and a Trump-hating, uh, comedian both saying Democrats have gone too far with their “purity tests” (

And here I thought they were testing us for our tolerance for excruciatingly boring horses***.

What exactly is a Democrat purity test? I mean, I only heard the term this morning. It seems to be the current mob of candidates’ constant striving to outdo one another in apologizing for perceived wrongs, putting on a show of groveling confession–a la “Beeto” O’Rourke, singin’ the blues about his family’s sins prior to the Civil War: crikey, what an insect–and forcing one’s competitors to top it. Or should I say “bottom it”? ‘Cause it surely is a race for the bottom of the barrel.

But it’s a Democrat barrel, so maybe it has no bottom.

So much for today’s nooze.

About leeduigon

I have lived in Metuchen, NJ, all my life. I have been married to my wife Patricia since 1977. I am a former newspaper editor and reporter. I was also the owner-operator of my own small business for several years. I wrote various novels and short stories published during 1980s and 1990s. I am a long-time student of judo and Japanese swordsmanship (kenjutsu). I also play chess, basketball, and military and sports simulations. View all posts by leeduigon

3 responses to “Democrat ‘Purity Tests’–Enough, Already

  • Valerie Protopapas

    These irrational and stupid (NOT ignorant) people are filled with rage. The devil is a bad master. Unlike Christ, he doesn’t give his followers peace or contentment or patience but fills them with an unquenchable anger that is only temporarily ameliorated when they triumph over those they hate. In the end, they find themselves in an afterlife filled with everything that they hated on earth.

    Liked by 1 person

  • thewhiterabbit2016

    I see where Tlaib is calling for a boycott of Bill Maher’s show – what a hoot. Up until 1961 most State Constitutions said you could not take an oath for an elected office is you did not believe in God. They still say it but the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional in the “Torcaso v. Watkins” case – so much for Originalists on the Court.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: