Science: Grown-Up Libs Still Have Imaginary Friends REPRINT

See the source image

From April 27, 2019

Incredibly rigorous research by Settled Science “R” Us has found that liberals–especially politicians and college professors–have imaginary friends all throughout their adult lives.

“The science is settled, so shut up already!” said Dr. X, who wishes to remain anonymous. “A lot of people have imaginary friends while they’re little kids, but big libs have ’em all their lives.”

Why do grown-up liberals have imaginary friends?

“First, what other kind can they get?” said Dr. X. “But second, and more importantly, who else but an imaginary person is going to provide the liberal with the constant reassurance he needs that he’s really, really smart, infinitely more virtuous than all those people he hates, and much, much nicer than everybody else? No real person is ever going to do that!

“You can’t help feeling kind of sorry for them. They think they’re so terribly smart, but they’re mostly rather stupid. They think they’re good and kind–well, that’s a lie! They think they do everything from the purist motives. That’s a laugh. Really, if they didn’t do so much freakin’ damage to the country, you could almost take up a collection for them. They haven’t got the ghost of a suspicion of how obnoxious they are. And they are appalled and mystified that ordinary people don’t bow down to them and acknowledge their greatness. Ah, me! Being the smartest persons in the world–it’s a thankless job!”

Liberals who do not yet have an imaginary friend, he added, can always get one just by watching CNN or MSNBC. “You’d be surprised how many of them have adopted one of the noozies they see on TV every night,” said Dr. X. “They love getting interviewed on an imaginary Sunday talk show by one of their imaginary friends–and they get a real charge out of it when Rachel Maddow or somebody praises them on international TV. That none of it’s real is something they lose track of rather quickly.”

Is this study saying, then, that the average adult liberal is… crazy?

“As a bedbug,” said Dr. X.

 

Are They Really Paying Some Noozie $30 Million a Year?

Jack In The Box Animation Free, HD Png Download - kindpng

I don’t feel well enough to post a picture of Rachel Maddox. Here’s the next best thing.

In one of the many lowlights in a year remarkable for having nothing but lowlights, MSNBC decided to pay Rachel Maddow $30 million a year to read cue cards and get weepy whenever a Democrat loses an election.

When this leaked out in August, MSNBC denied the reports but no one believed them (https://www.thewrap.com/maddow-deal-30-million-2024/). What kind of chump believes anything he hears from MSNBC? But this whole business is murky: I’m getting my information, for instance, from an outlet that describes Maddow as a “beloved fixture.” Sheesh. Is that like your favorite light bulb socket?

Apparently MSNBC panicked at the thought of losing Maddow, by far their least unsuccessful nooze anchor. Who would they have to replace her? (I nominate the fire extinguisher.)

Where do they even get $30 million?

I wonder what some of my light fixtures are worth.