Anyone got marshmallows?
Suddenly there are doubts. Suddenly it may be that electric cars (EVs) are not the answer, after all–indeed, that they are very far from being the answer to anything.
A researcher for the auto industry says electric cars’ batteries, which cost a fortune, are easily–very easily!–damaged and the cost of fixing the problem could be prohibitive… rendering EVs “effectively uninsurable” (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/net-zero/electric-cars-risk-becoming-uninsurable/).
Holy spontaneous combustion! Remarks like this can cost you: “[W]e have no way of understanding whether the battery has been compromised or damaged in any way.” And we all know what happens, don’t we, when an electric car’s battery gets up on the wrong side of the bed.
Kaboom.
And there’s also a “threat of thermal runaway.” That really does sound bad.
Hey, World Economic Forum! Hey, radical greenies! Back to the drawing board, eh? Looks like we’ll get to keep our cars a little longer. Curses, foiled again.
It’s crossed my mind that the EV mandates are meant deliberately to immobilize us — not just because of the expense and the limited range of the vehicles but also because they’re difficult to fuel, dangerous to be around, and very often self-immolating.
Yes, I agree–they want to take away our freedom of movement. got that right.
EVs don’t carry AM radio because there is too much interference by the battery output. They are like riding around in you cell phone, and cell phones are so bad you are not to hold them to your ear when talking.
Wow, I didn’t know that. Of course, there many things I am in the dark about. But then, if I had an EV, there would be a good chance, in the near future, I would be in the light, when it bursts into flames.
Meanwhile, libs have been trying to shut down AM radio for years.
Hopefully, this folly will soon pass.