Scientific Ninnies REPRINT

Product Details

From May 7, 2017

I love archeology, and I enjoyed one of the writer’s earlier books; so I’ve been reading The Lost City of the Monkey God (2017) by Douglas Preston.

In 2015, using the latest technology, scientists finally found a lost city in the heart of the most impenetrable jungle on the planet, in Honduras. People had been looking for this city, and not finding it, for some 500 years. They called it The White City, or The City of the Monkey God.

All of that is very interesting. It isn’t every day we turn up what appears to be a whole civilization that history had forgotten.

Now, the thing is, some of these native American civilizations went out of business before the Europeans came, so their demise can’t easily be blamed on Whitey (although you can be pretty sure our academics will soon get around to trying). The Mayan cities in the rain forest were simply abandoned: it seems the people got tired of the way things were and just walked out. There are still Mayan people today, and because their language has survived, we finally learned how to read the ancient Mayan inscriptions.

But none of those writings mention these very large cities in Honduras. Ah, but the question comes up again–why were these sites abandoned? What happened to the people who build the cities? Why was it all left to be devoured by the jungle?

And here’s where the scientific ninnie-ness comes in.

When the 2015 expedition announced its findings, academics who just sat on their fat kiesters in air-conditioned offices hastened to denounce the reports as hype, or even hoax. Really, there is not even a reasonable doubt that the expedition found the things it said it found. But academics, to paraphrase Deion Sanders, are like a bunch of crabs in a bushel basket: whenever one tries to climb out, the others pull it back down.

Preston himself is guilty of major ninnie-ness.

He thinks, see, that civilizations go bust because of capitalism, which he likens to a “cult” on a par with Scientology. Oh, well, just get rid of capitalism and bob’s your uncle, everything will be just perfect from then on. Says Preston, it’s the capitalist “elites” who crash civilizations. As if it would really make a difference if the elites just changed the color of their jerseys and called themselves socialists! Yo, Doug! You don’t like capitalism, go live in North Korea for a while. You won’t find any elites there (wink-wink, nudge-nudge)!

At the risk of incurring the displeasure of the whoopee crowd, dare I suggest that the main reason these American civilizations collapsed–or were overthrown by Spain–is because their abominable religious practices estranged them from God’s protection.

God hasn’t really let all that many civilizations get wiped out for good. He may destroy their empires and turn them into has-been nations, but usually something survives.

The native religion of the American civilizations revolved around the worship of gods who were no gods and the practice of human sacrifice on a massive scale. Should God have protected this? It seems He chose not to.

And before you scream at me for being an apologist for Spanish imperialism–well, that empire isn’t around anymore, is it? Could it have been accused of governing itself and its possessions according to God’s commandments? According to Jesus Christ’s teaching and example? Not a bit. So no more Spain as a great power in the world.

We live and thrive, all of us, Christian and non-Christian alike, at God’s pleasure. When He turns His face from us, we are troubled.

God will judge the whole earth, every nation, every tribe. And, as Abraham declared, shall not the judge of all the earth do right?

He will. He has and He will.

‘We’ll Bring Back the Mammoth!’ REPRINT

 From February 16, 2017

 

The Original Sin was to disobey God in order, as the Serpent put it, to “be as gods” (Genesis 3:5). That sin is very much with us today.

Scientists have announced a plan to bring back the extinct woolly mammoth by messing about with mammoth DNA and Asian elephant DNA, cutting and pasting and “editing genes” to create a mammoth embryo ( https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/16/woolly-mammoth-resurrection-scientists ). Then they can re-introduce a population of mammoths to the Siberian tundra to combat global warming! Oh–and as an added benefit, they predict these techniques can soon be refined so as to “reverse aging” in human beings.

As much as I would love to see a woolly mammoth, what I would be seeing here would not actually be a mammoth,  but rather an elephant that’s been tampered with to make it look like a mammoth–a counterfeit.

Does anyone honestly expect this to work out as advertised? Do a lot of us need to see Jurassic Park again?

Somehow reading stuff like this makes me feel like I’m getting stupider, not smarter.

Come, Lord Jesus, come–and save us from the folly of our worldly wisdom.

Hawking: Only World Government Can Save Us REPRINT

Image result for images of stephen hawking

From March 10, 2017

Science is always right about everything. Stephen Hawking is a prominent man of Science. Therefore Stephen Hawking is always right about everything. Or so the liberal logic goes.

Having jettisoned his belief in God, Hawking has climbed aboard the Doom & Gloom Express. First he says we’re all gonna die unless we colonize other planets. Global Warming gonna kill us. Then he says there might be aliens who’ll wipe us out. Or else Artificial Intelligence (created by blockheads) will do it.

This week, during a visit to India, he opined that we’re all gonna die unless we get a world government, which will prevent war and rein in “our aggressive instincts,” which are “hard-wired into our genes by Darwinian evolution,” blah-blah-blah ( http://zeenews.india.com/science/stephen-hawking-issues-warning-says-only-world-government-can-save-humanity-from-destruction_1984947.html ).

Why do scientists seem to know so very, very little about anything outside their special field of science?

World government–because everybody knows that the more power you give your rulers, the more wisely, humanely, and responsibly they will use it!

That’s their belief in a nutshell. And if you believe it, too–well, you need to get out more.

We Gonna Be Gods! REPRINT

From June 1, 2017

One thing you can say for Satan: he’s never left the building.

I have stumbled over a highly-touted book, Homo Deus by Yuval Noah Harari, said to be on every  globalist big shot’s required reading list. It’s all about how “Our inheritors will be godlike” and achieve all sorts of neat stuff, like abolishing war and poverty and disease and getting eternal happiness, immortality, and lots of nookie (  https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/books/review-homo-deus-yuval-noah-harari.html ). Yeah, yeah… they always say that. Ever since the Serpent told Eve, “Ye shall be as gods.”

It’s full of really smart-sounding quotes like, “The free individual is just a fictional tale concocted by an assembly of biochemical algorithms.” Y’know, I’ve heard that before. Rutgers Biology, 1969. A lecture about how total government control of every aspect of our lives–the government advised by infallible scientists, of course–is necessary, inevitable, and totally great. Someone asked, “But what about our freedom and individuality?” Answered our classroom instructor (the lecture was on CCTV), “Those are obsolete concepts that must be engineered out of the system.” She was really good at sticking dissecting needles through the heads of live frogs, but seemed to have no other talents.

But! says Yuval. But we gotta  be careful, ’cause just when we’re really getting into being gods, Artificial Intelligence will evolve to become smarter than we are and it will exterminate us.

Some of these guys, I don’t think they actually have to work with real computers and therefor have no idea at all of how unreliable and erratic computers are. And they seem to be getting worse instead of better. And common sense seems to be in short supply, too. The idea that a lot of sinful, wishful-thinking, sophomoric, ignorant, incompetent bullshit artists can grant us eternal life and happiness–I mean, really! Find someplace where they’re selling brain cells, and buy a few.

I’m so glad so many important people read books like this. Knowing that helps me to understand why they behave like immoral and psychotic numbskulls. Even the former occupant of the White House, President *Batteries Not Included, once recommended Homo Deus on TV. As seen on TV! It just doesn’t get more authoritative than that.

Lord, anytime you’re ready…

Before It Evolved into Twaddle…REPRINT

See the source image

From March 27, 2019

My wife and I like watching videos of prehistoric animals. Usually we can just tune out the Evolution just-so story that accompanies the video, if the visuals are cool enough.

So we settled down on Youtube to watch Morphed: Before They Were Bears.

Apart from the initial absurdity of declaring that life arose from non-living materials, purely by chance, it rained on de rocks and de rocks come alive, doo-dah, doo-dah, we were treated to unbearable nonsense about… bears. It seems that whenever prehistoric bears encountered some kind of environmental challenge, they wisely considered what they would need and then proceeded to evolve it.

Oh, boy! Whoever said there’s no quality control on Youtube wasn’t kidding!

So, ya see, the giant panda needed an opposable thumb so he could hold on to the bamboo while he was eating it, but the digits he already had were spoken for, so he just, like, went ahead and evolved one of his wrist bones into a kind of thumb… and what he was eating while waiting for his magical thumb to evolve, who knows? If it takes millions of years for revolutionary new body parts to evolve, how does the species last long enough to benefit by it? Or if it happens real fast, then how come no naturalist or farmer or zoo-keeper or pet owner has ever observed it?

This doesn’t even rise to the level of crapola. We couldn’t make it halfway through this video before we had to turn it off.

Darwinism wouldn’t last another ten days if there weren’t such a deep political investment in it by the Left.

Crazy Science: Rats with Human Brains REPRINT

From November 8, 2017

 

Check out this headline from The Sun (UK): “Scientists are implanting tiny HUMAN brains into rats” (https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/4867891/scientists-give-rats-consciousness-by-implanting-them-with-tiny-human-brains/).

Hmm… what’s goin’ on here? Like, where do you get tiny human brains that can fit into rats’ skulls? This Science is being conducted at Stanford University, so maybe that’s where the tiny human brains are. Maybe the campus is lousy with ’em.

Later on the reporter lets slip that what he means by “tiny human brains” is, in fact, little clumps of cells, taken from human brain tissue, called “organoids.” These micro-items are implanted in a rat’s brain, three or four organoids, and at least sometimes, by and by, become “functionally integrated with the rat.” The Sun Illustrates this point with a picture of a hamster. I guess if you’ve seen one little furry animal, you’ve seen ’em all.

Scientists have already, the reporter adds, “hacked rats’ brains,” making them run or freeze or turn around just by throwing a switch… “using an invisible magnetic field.”

Uh, aren’t all magnetic fields invisible? You can’t just look out your window and see one, can you?

The purpose of these experiments, we are told, is to learn more about the function of the brain and maybe how to fix it when it malfunctions. Well, okay, who can be opposed to that? But some bioethicists are worried about what might happen if they cram, say, 1,000 organoids into a rat’s head. Wouldn’t that make the rat… human-like? And thus entitled to “some kind of respect”? Hopefully more respect than Christians or conservatives get on campus.

We’ll know better if the rats start lying to each other, stealing stuff, getting lost in mazes that they used to run successfully, or cheating at cards.

Meanwhile… couldn’t we, like, respect them just as they are?

More Artificial Stupidity: It’s Getting Dangerous REPRINT

Funny Crazy Robot Stock Illustration | Adobe Stock

Maybe the robot doesn’t have the answers!

From May 28, 2024

Mozilla has pleaded with Google to turn off Google AI Overview–turn it off before it does serious damage.

Arstechnica.com goes into more detail (https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/05/googles-ai-overview-can-give-false-misleading-and-dangerous-answers/). As you know, robots are mindless; and they don’t have a sense of humor. So AI Overview sometimes provides “false, misleading, and dangerous answers” to users’ questions.

(Oh, but only sometimes! answer Google bigwigs.)

One of AI Overview’s little foibles is to take jokes (!) as facts: e.g. putting glue on pizza to keep the cheese from falling off, or “add more oil to a cooking fire.” Well, a robot doesn’t know a joke when it sees one, does it?

I’m beginning to wonder: Is there anything some people won’t do, to avoid thinking? How badly do we need this “Artificial Intelligence”? How many “Sorry about that!” moments are we prepared to accept?

What will my toaster-oven advise?

Yet Another Censorship Tactic REPRINT

Image result for images of mercola

 

From June 24, 2019

If you can’t find it, you can’t read it.

Big Tech has discovered another way to silence dissenting voices.

This time the victim is Mercola.com, known to subscribers as “Dr. Mercola.” In its latest search engine update, implemented June 3, Google “buries” Dr. Mercola (https://www.healthglu.com/uncategorized/google-buries-mercola-in-their-latest-search-engine-update-part-1-of-2/) by removing “most Mercola.com pages from its search results.” Now the only way a Mercola.com page will come up is if the user searches, for instance, “Mercola.com heart disease” instead of just “heart disease.”

“This year we’ve seen an unprecedented rush to implement censorship of critical voices,” Dr. Mercola says. Big Tech, he says, makes money by helping “fascist government-industrial complexes” to silence dissenters and critics.

Dr. Mercola’s crime, it seems, was to question the need for and the effectiveness of various vaccines–the new measles vaccine, for one, which he has said “offers only temporary artificial immunity” (https://articles.mercola.com/measles.aspx). Dr. Mercola has dissented from the current panic over measles, saying most of the measles deaths are the result of poor nutrition and generally poor health in Third World countries. Apparently there’s someone who doesn’t like that opinion and doesn’t think the public ought to read it.

They haven’t erased him: just made it harder for users to find him.

It’s not quite as draconian as the 2016 Democrat proposal to make “climate change denial” a crime with criminal sanctions–but it has caused Dr. Mercola’s Internet traffic to “plummet by 99 percent in recent weeks” since the update.

Not draconian, but certainly effective.

Is this how “science” is going to be done from now on? By silencing anyone who questions any claim made by a powerful establishment?

But that’s not science, is it?

The Tech Fair Horror! Robot Attacks, Injures Man

Robots v Humans: AI machine ‘attacks’ visitor at Chinese tech fair (PHOTOS)

From November 15, 2019

 

Oh, we shoulda listened to Isaac Asimov! Instead, it’s going all Terminator on us.

At the China International Hi-Tech Fair recently, a robot that was supposed to be an “educational tool” launched itself through a glass display case and made a frenzied attack on an innocent bystander, who was slightly injured (https://www.rt.com/viral/367426-robot-attack-china-technology/). We are unable to confirm reports that the robot growled “Die, human, die!”

I dunno, it doesn’t look so fierce to me. It looks kinda like R2D2 from Star Wars. Which reminds me–What does R2D2 take when he has a cold? Robotussin! But I digress.

It should be pointed out that some killjoy who doesn’t want us to have any fun with the nooze says the robot crashed through the display case because somebody mixed up the “forward” and “back” buttons, hit the one when he should’ve hit the other. We would rather read that the robot’s Artificial Intelligence took it upon itself to add a blood-lust program. “He must’ve programmed himself to do that!” Just because those immortal words originated in Godzilla vs. Megalon doesn’t mean they aren’t true.

Just to be on the safe side, steer clear of hi-tech fairs and bring no robots into your home. ‘Cause you never know when they might program themselves to be smarter than you and take away your stuff.

Sludge Dumpers Say Jersey Fish Committed Mass Suicide

An Inquisitor column from August 4, 1976

Evidence provided the State Assn. of Sludge Producers and Dumpers indicates that the massive fish kills off the Jersey shore are an example of mass suicide among the lower animals.

“They killed themselves,” said Dr. Jack C. Robbin, a biologist retained by the association, “and that’s all there is to it.”

“Dr. Robbin’s findings lay to rest, once and for all, the fallacious rumor that sludge dumping kills marine life.” said Harold Slyme, president of the association.

The reasons for the catastrophic deaths of fish, lobsters, clams and other ocean creatures have been hotly debated.  The ecology-minded have blamed it on sludge-dumping, while others have attributed it to natural causes.

The arguments pointing to sludge as the culprit were strong.  Sludge can smother clams and other burrowers by clogging up their air holes, can poison fish that feed on sludge-coated plants and tiny animals, and may carry bacteria whose activities can upset the oxygen balance in the water.

“The infamous ‘Dead Sea’ is not our fault,” declared Slyme, referring to a 20 square mile patch of ocean floor off New Jersey which is now devoid of life.  “Dr. Robbin sent several divers down there, and the ones who came back reported that no sludge was present.”

(Environmentalist groups have called that statement “an out-and-out lie” and advised interested observers to “ask any oceanographer.”

One of the divers, Arthur Kill, described a scene on the ocean floor just off the mouth of the Manasquan River.

“It was horrible,”  Kill said, “I saw several lobsters crouched in a hara-kiri position, just like a bunch of little Japanese generals.  Dozens of clams had closed up their shells and literally starved themselves to death, and fish were belly-up everywhere.”

The fish, he explained, had apparently committed suicide by refusing to circulate water through their gills.

“We knew it wasn’t sludge,” said Slyme.  “After all, we’ve been pumping sludge into the ocean for years, and there are still more fish in it than you can shake a stick at.  Until Dr. Robbin finished his investigation we would’ve bet on the natural-causes theory as the answer.”

The Middle Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Center, which maintains a laboratory at Sandy Hook, postulated several causes for the disaster.

“A number of environmental factors including temperature extremes, low oxygen, disease and toxic substances can contribute to fish and shellfish mortalities,” reads a press release from the center.   Ruling out disease and temperature change, fish scientists found a very low concentration of oxygen in the water where the fish kills occurred.

The scientists said the low oxygen level could have been caused by an excessively high bloom of plankton (small plants and animals).  When the plankton die and sink to the bottom, the report continued, bacteria will feed on their remains and in the process, use up oxygen.  If there were an excess of dead plankton, there could be an excess of oxygen-using bacteria which would cause an oxygen shortage.

“Some people were trying to blame us for causing the excessive plankton bloom in the first place,” said Slyme.  “Here and there crackpots were saying that the presence of sludge made the bacteria population explode.  But now we know that’s a lot of bull.”

The State Assn of  Sludge Dumpers and Producers was formed several months ago to combat the bad publicity which has been growing up around oceanic waste disposal over the years.  Various municipalities, sewerage authorities and manufacturers have joined.

The association has entered the fight against a recent EPA order intended to eliminate sludge dumping by 1981, and Slyme said that Dr. Robbin’s findings would be presented as evidence that sludge-dumping causes no harm to marine life.

“You can’t have your cake and eat it, too.”  Slyme said.  What are we supposed to do with all the sludge and other noxious wastes our society produces–make perfume out of it?  If you want progress, you have to mess up the environment a little.  At least if we dump the sludge into the ocean, nobody has to worry about stepping in it.”

“Oceans cover about 70 per cent of the earth’s surface,” Dr. Robbin said, “Furthermore, nobody lives in the ocean.  It’s only common sense to dispose of waste in the ocean where you have all that room, than on land where you have less and less open space every year.”

Many scientists have expressed doubts about Dr. Robbin’s findings.  Even if the fish did commit suicide, they argue, what would make them do it?

“Beats me,” conceded Dr Robbins.  “I can’t read a fluke’s mind. Maybe the lobsters figured it was better to do a job on themselves than to sit around and wait to get caught and boiled alive.”

But many remain unconvinced.  Indeed, one scientist interprets the suicides as damning evidence against sludge dumping.

“You’d think about killing yourself, too, ” the scientist said, “if somebody kept dumping all that crap on your head.”