Voting Machine Tampering Case: Defendant Ruled ‘Incompetent’

Film Freaks Forever! on Twitter: "SILLY SATURDAY STAN LAUREL (1890-1965)  The crown prince of comedians. The greatest. Bar none. What he did was  beyond compare. I bow down to him. (And, yes,

“I’m better now!” (He was just “incompetent” when he did it…

Well, see, it doesn’t count as voter fraud if you did what you did because you were “incompetent”!

A court ruled that a man accused of tampering with voting machines in a Colorado primary election is “incompetent” and therefor can’t be tried–the case is on hold until (and that day may never come) they find him “competent” to stand trial (https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4119846/posts).

We knew it had to be something like that! I mean, really, who would ever try to rig a voting machine? Get real.

Are we ever going to have a credibly honest national election ever again? Honk if you think the last one was okay.

7 comments on “Voting Machine Tampering Case: Defendant Ruled ‘Incompetent’

  1. Competent enough to tamper with an election, but not competent enough to stand trial. I see a problem, with this.

Leave a Reply to Michele DumasCancel reply