science isn’t science anymore

From August 15, 2016

Hey! Remember this? How we defenseless taxpayers of America paid over $400,000 to some idiot “professor” to pioneer “feminist glaciology” and “the connection between gender and glaciers”?

So you thought I was kidding yesterday when I wrote “Physics goes P.C.”? Well, so did I–but now I’m not so sure. I mean, here we’ve got a “feminist political ecology and feminist postcolonial approach” to the study of glaciers. What the blazes does that mean?

We are asked–if not ordered–to believe in “science” as the ultimate arbiter of truth. If “science” says it ain’t so, then it ain’t so: sayonara, Book of Genesis. And if “science” says it’s so, then it’s so: come on in, feminist glaciology! Here, you can sit down right here, between Climate Change and Evolution.

Is what we call “science” even science anymore?

If you say yes, lots of luck trying to prove it.

See the source image

Friedrich Engels, Karl Marx’s co-author and co-founder of communism

I have an ongoing discussion with a Christian friend and brother who clings to Science and considers Darwin’s Theory of Evolution as a demonstrated fact–although who demonstrated it, or how, is more than I know.

I go by the principle of “by their fruits you shall know them.” Darwinism has bitter fruit. It assisted at the birth of communism.

Said Engels, after reading The Origin of the Species, “Darwin… is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that has yet to be demolished, and that has been done.”

Amplifies International Socialist Review, “The essential connection between historical materialism and natural selection” was established by Darwin.

Is the world a better place because of Darwinist dogma?

If you can answer “yes,” we are surely talking about two different planets.