How Much Worse Can It Get?


The grin of pure idiocy

I’m beginning to think the transgender push may be the worst thing that’s happened in my lifetime. The pace is alarmingly fast–almost too fast to keep track of.

Latest: a Pew Research poll finds that 77% of Democrats with four years or more of college believe “sex is not determined at birth” (

Well, what do you expect from Democrats? And what do you expect from college? But still, that’s millions of people, millions of deluded idiots spouting this abominable twaddle.

And note the language creep within the poll, the repetition of the formula, “the sex they were assigned at birth.” What do they mean, assigned? Assigned by whom? An assignment necessarily implies an assigner. Uh, that would be God, wouldn’t it? So here are all these grinning moral imbeciles saying God’s assignments are wrong, He just can’t get it right. In fact, by insisting that reality is whatever we say it is, we assert that we are God.

I don’t know where this is taking us, but I’ll bet you anything it ends very badly. Very badly indeed, and with either a loud crash or a sickening soft plop.

About leeduigon

I have lived in Metuchen, NJ, all my life. I have been married to my wife Patricia since 1977. I am a former newspaper editor and reporter. I was also the owner-operator of my own small business for several years. I wrote various novels and short stories published during 1980s and 1990s. I am a long-time student of judo and Japanese swordsmanship (kenjutsu). I also play chess, basketball, and military and sports simulations. View all posts by leeduigon

21 responses to “How Much Worse Can It Get?

  • Linda Sorci

    The other day I saw a report stating that by the year 2035, the male population will be unable to procreate. I’d say that’s a pretty bad ending.


    • UnKnowable

      I think that’s the end Satan is shooting for.


    • Watchman

      Both ancient Greece and Rome had this problem and it did not end well for them. Historian Jerome Carcopino said that many Roman marriages by the end of the second century were childless. “By copying men too closely the Roman woman succeeded more rapidly in emulating man’s vices than in squiring his strength.” -Anthony Esolen

      Cicero said of the decline of the Spartan population, “Spartan girls care more for wrestling, bathing in the River Eurotas, the sun, dust, and martial exercise than they do for the barbarous bearing of offspring.” It would seem they also had their gender identity problems.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Watchman

        squiring = acquiring. Darn typos.


      • UnKnowable

        The parallels are amazing.

        In my own family, my two sets of grandparents each had 6 children. By the next generation, my generation, there were 9 grandchildren on on side, 14 on the other. The side with 9 grandchildren managed to produce only 6 great-grandchildren and only 5 great-great-grandchildren that I am aware of. The side with 14 grandchildren managed to produce 18 great-grandchildren but the next generation is far less than that.

        Now most of these people are practicing Christians and not of the elite in any sense of the word. Two very fertile families which intersected to produce my immediate family have, at the very least tapered off considerably and are no longer reproducing at replacement rate. I have a handful of living cousins at this point and a reunion of every member of my grandparent’s descendants could be held in a single room. That’s scary stuff!

        Over ten years ago, I told a Native American acquaintance that he would live to see the decline and fall of Western Civilization and I stand by my words.

        Amen, come quickly Lord Jesus.


        • Watchman

          Religious families always have more children than secular families. Note the high birth rates of Muslims. They compare to what used to be the norm here. The more secular a society becomes, the less children it has. The majority of the leaders of Europe, for instance, are childless. As a result they have no real stake in the future.


      • leeduigon

        Augustus Caesar called those childless Romans “murderers of your own posterity.”


  • Phoebe

    Well, actually, those collidge-edjicated Democrats are right — sex isn’t determined at birth; it’s determined at conception. But that would mean a new human being is begun at conception, so we can’t ask the question that way. Those collidge-edjicated Democrats believe that the child doesn’t exist at all until birth … if then.


    • leeduigon

      Peter Singer, “America’s greatest philosopher since John Dewey” (give me strength), says parents ought to have an additional three months after birth in which to kill their babies.

      And the beauty of it is, they’ll all still be voting Democrat long after they’ve been iced.


  • marlene

    No matter how bad it is, it can always get worse. Wait for the genetically modified CRISPR babies when people can have any kind of baby they want. Then wait for the State to decide for them. Hopefully, the age ends before this horror.


  • thewhiterabbit2016

    Richard Dawkins was asked if he believed in God, and he said “no”, he believed in Natural Selection. And there you have the push for Transgenderism, it’s Natural Selection in real time – NOT!!!!


    • leeduigon

      He was also asked, by Ben Stein, he he believed space aliens might have “seeded” our planet with life, which ultimately evolved into climbit scientists and Democrats. To that he said “Yes!” and then complained bitterly about Stein making him look like a dicky-doo-dah.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: