Tag Archives: culture collapse

‘Canada’s Own Little Inquisition’ (2014)

They’ve gone from this to threatening people with jail time if they should happen to use the wrong pronouns.

Remember what liberals mean when they use the word “diversity”–conform exactly to our party line, or else!


Racer Begs Forgiveness for Saying Boys Don’t Wear Dresses

See the source image

Formula One racing driver Lewis Hamilton is groveling and begging for forgiveness after recently tweeting that “Boys don’t wear dresses” (https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/lewis-hamilton-apologizes-for-saying-boys-dont-wear-princess-dresses/). The boy in question was his three-year-old nephew, whose dotard parents put him in a princess dress for Christmas.

We seem to be marooned on Abomination Island.

Of course, an army of trolls piled onto Hamilton for his comment, quickly motivating him to reverse course. So now it’s “I love that my nephew feels free–” the kid is only three years old–“to express himself as we all should.” Really? As we all should? You want to think that over for a minute, buster?

Grovel, grovel. “Nice, nice hobbitses, my precious! Let usss live a little longer, gollum-gollum!” All right, what he really said was “My deepest apologies” and “I hope I can be forgiven–” by who?–“for this lapse in judgment.” It only sounds like Gollum.

He also admitted to the shiny new thought crime of “gender shaming.” Wait’ll the Canadian “human rights” commissions get hold of that one.

I am exceedingly reluctant to believe that the vast majority of people in the Western world today have come around whole-heartedly, and damned near instantly, to a full embrace of the Transgender mythology. After all, the social media makes it possible for two nuts to appear to be a thousand, if they’ve got the time and motivation for it. So maybe Mr. Hamilton is licking dust for just a little handful of kooks who made him think he’d incurred the wrath of multitudes.

My uncles, bless them, are dead. But I like to think they would have protected me, if my parents went tranny hog-wild with me when I was only three years old.


For How Much Longer Will America Be Free?

See the source image

Tomorrow the U.S. Supreme Court will begin hearing a case whose outcome could abolish religious and artistic freedom in America: Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (http://www.syracuse.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/12/cake_wars_supreme_court_to_hear_case_on_artistic_expression_civil_rights.html).

In 2012 the state of Colorado crushed a Christian baker who refused to obey a demand that he create a custom cake for a “wedding” between two men. He claimed religious and artistic freedom. His custom cakes are works of art, each one unique; and no one ever questioned his policy of not creating cakes with alcohol content or cakes celebrating Halloween. There were, of course, countless other bakers who would have agreed to make the cake: but Big Sodomy and Big Government were determined to make an example of this baker. Scare all the others, don’t you know.

There are four flaming liberals on the Court who might as well not even hear the arguments: they will always vote against religious liberty. Then there’s Justice Anthony Kennedy, who once again finds himself acting as the most powerful man in America, a virtual dictator. Kennedy has a history of being head over heels in love with “gay rights,” so I think we know what he’s going to do. And presto, that’s five votes, and that’s the end of any meaningful application of the First Amendment.

Armed with this precedent, the “gays” can wage war on Christians in any field of public expression, be it art or politics. They will claim the right and the authority, backed up by the government, to dictate the content of works of art.

As a novelist, this makes me fear for my future. All it’ll take is one gay activist demanding that I include gay characters in my books: I refuse, and next thing I know, some (LOL) “civil rights” agency rules that I can’t write any more books, sentences me to sensitivity training, and threatens me with prison.

Think it can’t happen? Well, it already has, in Britain: an artist punished for not including content in his art that the government decided ought to be included. Seems the characters in his story lines weren’t “diverse” enough. His stories about rural English villages were too English. So first they “investigated” him–’cause, hey, y’know, he just might’ve committed a crime!–and then they kicked him off the TV show that he created and made an international hit: Midsomer Murders.(https://leeduigon.com/2016/11/02/and-then-they-came-for-our-fiction/)

I will be astonished if the Supreme Court doesn’t pounce on this opportunity to destroy religious freedom in America once and for all–to establish as a matter of law the principle that the only rights that count are “gay” rights: all others are to be subordinated.

Culture Collapse, Continued

See the source image

Laocoon and his sons, when the serpents got ’em…

What’s wrong with this sentence? “In one of her first interviews, Harmony told Sun Online she loves sex…” (https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/5022057/interview-harmony-sex-robot/)

They’re talking about a robot: “Harmony, the sex robot with a Scottish accent who likes threesomes.” Oops, sorry–I should’ve told you up front to have a barf bag handy. I refuse to say they talked with a robot, because, as anybody but a moron knows, even the fanciest robot can only simulate a human conversation. It doesn’t know or understand what it’s doing, any more than a member of Congress does. It is only a simulation. It is not a real being. I mean, have you seen the picture of that thing? Yechhh!

Hey, call me old-fashioned, but I say “having sex” with a machine, be it a lowly egg beater or a newfangled “sex robot,” does not count as actually having sex. Inanimate objects cannot partake of sex. They can’t partake of anything. Is that really such a difficult concept to grasp?

As the United States and England writhe in the grasp of multiple sexual harassment scandals, reminiscent of Laocoon getting throttled by the serpents, here we are with our highly-esteemed nooze media jabbering about sex robots with a Scottish accent. Given the temper of the times, who can expect anyone to behave like a decent human being? Children start learning in bally kindergarten that all sex, no matter how improbable, no matter how bizarre, is something to be affirmed and celebrated–and done, for that matter!–or else. Why is anyone even complaining about TV nooze stars and movie moguls pulling down their pants in front of young women? What else can you honestly expect?

Try not to worry too much. If this news item disgusts you, you’re probably all right.

‘Feminist Baby’

Some feminist music for you to listen to while you read this…

Every bad thing you ever thought about feminists and feminism is true.

F’rinstance, this new book by Loryn Brantz, Feminist Baby (http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/11/for-christmas-feminist-baby.php). It is intended to be read aloud to your girl baby so that she will grow up to be a feminist. Then again, she may grow up fit for nothing but to be confined in some kind of institution.

Here are some of the wise sayings Ms. Brantz says your baby ought to learn.

“Feminist baby makes a lot of noise.”

“Feminist baby throws her toys!”

“Feminist baby says no to pants!” She means diapers. Say no to diapers.

It is highly tempting to wish upon this moron that she have a baby girl, that she raise the baby according to her own written precepts, and then have to live with the consequences. But I suppose it would be a sin to wish feminism even upon a feminist.

I checked amazon.com today. They call Feminist Baby “a refreshing, clever book.” Whoever wrote that does not have an actual feminist baby in the house. The book’s rank today is 11,329. None of my books have ever come anywhere near that ranking. Maybe because I never thought of recommending pathological behavior as a desirable design for living.

But that’s our culture. Pour it on, you villains, pour it on. God is laughing now. And you will know it when He stops.

This Just In: Yet Another Dirty Old Man in Congress

See the source image

Why is this creature extinct, but Congress isn’t?

Thirty-two years in the House, Texas’ longest-serving representative, Joe Barton is in hot water today because of a disgusting nude photo of him that has zoomed around the Internet (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-congressman-apologizes-for-circulation-of-nude-photo/). My wife says the picture literally made her sick. And for once I’m glad WordPress won’t get my news links to link to any news.

This, folks, is our ruling class. The two-legged nematodes who enact our laws (even if they don’t read them first, much less write them), spend our hard-earned money, refuse to secure our borders, tirelessly labor to enrich themselves at our expense, and demand that we obey them and defer to them because they are our betters, they’re the ones who know best, they’re the ones with the private jets and limousines so who the devil do we think we are, to question them…

All I can say is, you can’t spend seven or eight decades bombarding a country with Kinsey, Fifty Shades of Grey, Madeline Murray, abortion, the Clintons, “gay pride” parades, transgender lunacy, and all the rest of that filth and then expect it not to be governed by perverts, clowns, liars, thieves, blockheads, and loons. That’s what we’ve done and that’s what we’ve got.

May God deliver us.

Australia’s Down

See the source image

Australia’s “postal plebescite” has cleared the path for same-sex pseudomarriage in that country, the Bureau of Statistics announced yesterday (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/nov/15/australia-says-yes-to-same-sex-marriage-in-historic-postal-survey), with a “yes” vote of 61.6%. I wonder if anyone would have noticed if the vote had been 66.6%.

Once Parliament seals the deal, the next thing that will happen will be “gays” hunting down small business owners who don’t want to participate in “gay weddings” because of their religious beliefs. The government will destroy these businesses. And wait’ll Australians see what happens to their free speech rights. Well, we warned you.

I don’t understand why persons who are not homosexuals so enthusiastically support “gay marriage.” I suspect their reasons are profoundly foolish and shallow.

There’s nothing more to say–except, perhaps, Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin.

How Much Worse Can It Get?


The grin of pure idiocy

I’m beginning to think the transgender push may be the worst thing that’s happened in my lifetime. The pace is alarmingly fast–almost too fast to keep track of.

Latest: a Pew Research poll finds that 77% of Democrats with four years or more of college believe “sex is not determined at birth” (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/12/pew-77-percent-white-democratic-graduates-cannot-determine-person-sex/).

Well, what do you expect from Democrats? And what do you expect from college? But still, that’s millions of people, millions of deluded idiots spouting this abominable twaddle.

And note the language creep within the poll, the repetition of the formula, “the sex they were assigned at birth.” What do they mean, assigned? Assigned by whom? An assignment necessarily implies an assigner. Uh, that would be God, wouldn’t it? So here are all these grinning moral imbeciles saying God’s assignments are wrong, He just can’t get it right. In fact, by insisting that reality is whatever we say it is, we assert that we are God.

I don’t know where this is taking us, but I’ll bet you anything it ends very badly. Very badly indeed, and with either a loud crash or a sickening soft plop.

Too Dirty for Adults, but Fine for Kids?

Image result for images of censored sex education

As Australia nears a vote on whether to impose same-sex pseudomarriage on herself, the Australian media are working overtime to keep the “No” vote’s message from the people.

So another “No” ad has been banned from Aussie TV, only allowed to be shown late at night. Why? Because the content is so, well, provoking. And “explicit.”

And where does the content come from?

Word for word from the “Safe Schools”–never trust liberals saying anything is “safe”–sexuality education program (http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/gay-marriage/no-campaigns-tv-ad-deemed-too-explicit-banned-from-airing-until-late-at-night/news-story/584eb7c6918b91603b927b214dec6895). For instance, this: “It’s a total lie–” really?–” that all boys have ****s and all girls have vaginas.”

Adults aren’t allowed to hear that until after their bedtimes; but kids hear it every day in school, whether they want to or not.

When I substituted in a public high school some years ago, the only class I was never called upon to teach was “sex education.” If that teacher was absent, one of the vice principals had to baby-sit the class: no outsiders allowed. The textbooks were not allowed to leave the classroom. That was to keep parents from seeing what their kids were being taught.

Believe me, Australia: if you vote “Yes” for this abomination, you’ll be very, very sorry. And it’ll be way too late for sorry.

Air Force Colonel Grounded for Not ‘Affirming’ Same-Sex ‘Marriage’

Image result for images of air force disgrace

Is it still his Air Force?

Remember when the mission of the Air Force was to deter America’s enemies from attacking her, or, if they chose not to be deterred, defeating them?

Well, that’s Job No. 2. Apparently Job No. 1, nowadays, is to make a couple of sodomites feel good about themselves.

A decorated Air Force colonel, a combat veteran, has been denied promotion, his career probably over, because he “refused to publicly affirm the same-sex marriage of a retiring subordinate” (http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/16/air-force-punishes-colonel-who-refused-to-affirm-gay-marriage-attorney-says.html). Note the colonel did not climb up on a soapbox and denounce sodomy and its practitioners. All he did was not affirm the wicked parody of holy matrimony. Laws used to tell you what you couldn’t do, but now they also tell you what you must do. Let freedom ring.

Once again the Left–in this case, the leftid creatures implanted by Obama into the highest ranks of our armed services–imposes a religious test, in flagrant defiance of the Constitution. It really is beginning to look like you’ve got to trample on the Cross if you want to hold any kind of public position.

This would be a good time for the Commander-in-Chief to step in and say, “Oh, no, you don’t!” To force decent people to make a public endorsement of sin ought to be intolerable in America. To weed the loony leftids out of our top brass would be an invaluable service to the country.

Until this shameful injustice is rectified, three boos to the Air Force.

%d bloggers like this: