Law Prof ‘Debunks’ Parental Rights

Image result for images of the state as monster

Humanism–the worship of monsters

I keep telling you there’s no one as anti-human as a humanist. Here’s yet another example of it.

One James Dwyer, a law professor at William & Mary College and a big wheel in the family court business, in a recent interview with Michelle Malkin, said there is “no inherent right” to parent one’s own children (http://medicalkidnap.com/2017/09/12/law-professor-attacks-homeschoolers-believes-state-should-choose-parents-for-babies/). Indeed, he went further than that. In this quote, he seems to deny the biological reality of parenthood:

“The reason that parent-child relationship exists is because the state confers legal parenthood on people through its paternity and maternity laws.”

Gee, getting born to someone has nothing to do with it. I didn’t know that! Did you?

In 1994 this blot on the cultural landscape wrote “Debunking the Doctrine of Parents’ Rights,” published by the California Law Review. So you see, he’s not just some kook on a leftid blog. He is a respected member of the legal profession with rather more clout than most.

Oh, and he really hates homeschooling, too. Being educated by your parents, who love you, rather than by strangers and ideologues employed by the state, who are in it for the pension, violates your rights as a child. I don’t quite see that, but then I’m not a prestigious member of the law community.

Again, these people may seem funny, their positions laughable, their self-importance comical. But if they ever acquired the power to do the things they want to us, that wouldn’t be funny at all.

Laugh them off the stage while they’re still funny.

The Devil’s Crossroads

Image result for images of satan the deceiver

I keep coming back to the Humanist Manifesto II–why is it every pack of mountebanks and villains has a “manifesto”?–published in 1973, as the quintessential document of modern evil. Satanism, pseudo-science, statism and globalism: this is where they all come together. This is the devil’s crossroads.

They tell us in the first paragraph that belief in God must be abandoned: “Salvationism, based on mere affirmation, still appears as harmful, diverting people with false hopes of heaven hereafter.”

That’s okay, though. They’ve got an alternative.

“Using technology wisely, we can… alter the course of human evolution and cultural development…”  (https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/manifesto2/)    Among other things. You name it, technology will do it. Provided it isn’t busy getting hacked, updated, or just not working.

I mention this on a Sunday because we all need to be reminded, from time to time, what we’re up against.

This is spiritual wickedness in high places (Ephesians 6:12) being carried out by its slaves and servants in low places. We are seeing this twaddle played out right before our eyes. No more truth! We are, now, whatever we say we are: we create ourselves from day to day!

Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin…

God’s patience is inexhaustible, but not unlimited. He will not grow weary: He that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep. But He is righteous, and He will not have this stuff in His Kingdom when Christ comes down again to claim it on the earth.

Of course the humanists claim they want to do good things, like conquer poverty and get rid of disease, abolish war, etc. They always seem to wind up with lots of barbed wire and dead bodies cluttering the landscape, whenever they take power. Their rejection of Almighty God is profound, as anyone but a pluperfect fool can see from their document. To reject God is to reject love. Case closed.

Two death cults confront God’s people in this fallen world: humanism and radical Islam.

And of the two, humanism is by far the more dangerous.