The Reparations Derby REPRINT

From June 24, 2019Image result for images of crazy elizabeth warren

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Looneyland) wants “the government”–that means you, the taxpayers–to pay reparations to “gay” and lesbian “couples” who weren’t able to get the tax benefits of marriage until “gay marriage” was gaveled into existence by five lawyers on the Supreme Court (https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/23/elizabeth-warren-reparations-same-sex-couples/).

Remember, from seventh-grade civics, that thing about the Constitutional protection against ex post facto laws–that is, you couldn’t be tried for doing something that wasn’t against the law at the time you did it? Oh, you had no seventh-grade civics; never had civics at all… Well, if you were better educated than Sen. Warren, you’d know it’s unconstitutional to punish anyone for a) things they didn’t do, b) things that weren’t illegal at the time, or c) things they didn’t have the power to prevent.

But then we are talking about a woman who jump-started her whole career with a totally false claim that she was a Native American.

Speaking of which, Pocahontas wants reparations for them, too.

Let’s see… reparations for blacks, homosexuals, Native Americans… who’s gonna feel hard done by, if they get left off the list? Trannies, surely. Illegal aliens. Gang members. And let’s not forget the biggest aggrieved minority of them all–women! Definitely reparations for women, who were kept down, who were second-class citizens, for centuries. Go ahead, tell me they weren’t.

While we’re at it, I would like some reparations money, too. My ancestors on both sides of the Rhine were enslaved and tormented and massacred by the Romans. I should get some dough for that!

But there’s also atheists, pagans, short people, tall people, ugly people who couldn’t get dates in high school, fat people who always got picked last when choosing up sides, stupid people, silly people, highly intelligent people who got called names…

Where do we stop?

And don’t worry about what it’ll cost! Like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez always says, we can just print up more money whenever we run out! And she’s got a degree in economics.

Think she might be entitled to a refund?

‘Free Speech in Canada: Bye-Bye’ (My Newswithviews Column, May 2)

Elon Musk Slams Canadian PM Trudeau

How long does this wack-job (Left, of course) get to stay in office?

“Student Protests” are sucking up all the oxygen in the room this week; nevertheless, more attention ought to be paid to what’s going on in Canada.

Nothing less than the virtual abolition of free speech.

Free Speech in Canada: Bye-Bye

I mentioned it here a couple of days ago. The Canadian Parliament wants to punish you for things you said or did before they were against the law. H.G. Wells warned us about the dangers of time travel: but this was a danger that he never thought of.

I’m finding it increasingly hard to believe that there was ever any age that enthroned more sheer wickedness than this one.

Canada Moves to Erase Free Speech

0303_esbb_short_feature

Justin Trudeau and Fidel Castro: birds of a feather

There’s too much bad nooze out there today for one reporter to cover, so I’ll leave you with this monstrosity coming out of Canada.

If the Online Harms Bill C-63 is passed by Parliament, Canada will have its own ex post facto law (https://revolver.news/2024/04/canada-introduces-blood-curdling-new-thought-police-law-that-would-make-even-stalin-blush/)! Wow! Canadians will be criminally liable for posts they published years and years ago… and for things the government thinks they might say in the future!

Are we in North Korea, Toto?

Our American Constitution (God bless our country’s founders!) forbids the government to enact ex post facto laws–any law that holds a citizen criminally responsible for things he did or said before any law forbidding them was passed.

But it’s not enough for Parliament to reach way back into a targeted citizen’s past. They also want to dip their claws into the future, too. Under this bill, you can be placed under house arrest for any “hate speech”–defined whimsically by Parliament–you might indulge in years from now.

What will it take to preserve free speech in Canada?

A miracle?