Tag: Scientific American

Oh, No! We’re Eating Too Much Protein!

Posted By: leeduigonPosted On:

Heavy Gauge Aluminum "Outhouse" Bathroom, Outhouse Novelty Sign - FREE SHIPPING | eBay

Remember these? What do you want to bet the WEF will try to bring them back? For us, of course–not for them.

Here come da Science! Here come da Science!

So dash it all, we’re eating too much protein, Scientific American says (https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4082031/posts), and we’d better stop because our pee has too much nitrogen in it and it’s polluting our water and there’s too many of us eatin’ too much protein… [Pause for hyperventilation]

We thought they just wanted us to settle for bug-burgers and cricket loaf, but it turns out that bugs and lentils etc. also contain protein and we’re peeing out too much nitrogen… but not to worry! We’ve got options.

1) Stop peeing.

2) Just don’t eat protein. Well, hardly any. Candy’s just as good for you as beef, according to Scientists.

3) Kill off half the human race. World Economic Forum describes most of us as “useless eaters.”

Whichever option we choose, growing the government into an all-powerful behemoth is an indispensable part of the plan. “Resistance is futile” has to be more than just a slogan!

And anyone who disagrees with Science should be beaten senseless.

Not a Shred of Integrity Left

Posted By: leeduigonPosted On:

Feminist Science – the Queer Interspecies Tango | Rantzerker (with ...

Looks like what I’ve been saying about Science lately is, unhappily, true.

Scientific American–you remember that: it was a science magazine, once upon a time–has published a load of feminist crapola equating refusal to wear a face mask with refusal to wear a condom, both being an expression of–ooooh!–“masculine ideology” (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-condoms-of-the-face-why-some-men-refuse-to-wear-masks/).

And guess what? It’s all Donald Trump’s fault! Dig that Science. Yep, he’s one of those “white men with epic swagger”–men who are not white are apparently okay–and “the high priest of this ideology.” None o’ those “emasculating face condoms” for them!

Yatta-yatta.

There’s no integrity in Science anymore. The most sensitive instruments cannot detect it. You look for a “scientific,” informative article, and all you get is some ditzy feminist Trump-bashing. Oh. And white men are bashable, too. And it’s not Hate Speech if you just hate them!

What about all those women who refuse to wear face masks?

Shut up, the Scientist explained.

When you mix Science and politics, all you get is politics.

Scientific American (!) Tells People to ‘Chill Out’ over Global Warming

Posted By: leeduigonPosted On:

See the source image

Forget about it!

The we’re-all-gonna-die crowd got a poke in the eye recently from Scientific American, of all people, in an article telling the world to “chill out over Global Warming” (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/12/in-startling-reversal-scientific-american-counsels-people-to-chill-out-over-global-warming/).

The Climbit Change alarmists’ “apocalyptic scenarios are simply false,” says the article, exhibiting “radicalism and fatalism” that denies the undeniably beneficial effects of industrialization and modernization, especially in the world’s poorest countries. And if there are any real effects of Global Warming, human ingenuity will be up to the challenge of dealing with it.

Toldja!

But of course, the Climbit Change ideology is a mere grab, the biggest grab in history, for raw power and fabulous amounts of public money. After all, once it’s established that everything our dear leaders do is to Save The Planet, they have license to do anything they please.

Even Scientific American can see that now.