Not a Shred of Integrity Left

Feminist Science – the Queer Interspecies Tango | Rantzerker (with ...

Looks like what I’ve been saying about Science lately is, unhappily, true.

Scientific American–you remember that: it was a science magazine, once upon a time–has published a load of feminist crapola equating refusal to wear a face mask with refusal to wear a condom, both being an expression of–ooooh!–“masculine ideology” (

And guess what? It’s all Donald Trump’s fault! Dig that Science. Yep, he’s one of those “white men with epic swagger”–men who are not white are apparently okay–and “the high priest of this ideology.” None o’ those “emasculating face condoms” for them!


There’s no integrity in Science anymore. The most sensitive instruments cannot detect it. You look for a “scientific,” informative article, and all you get is some ditzy feminist Trump-bashing. Oh. And white men are bashable, too. And it’s not Hate Speech if you just hate them!

What about all those women who refuse to wear face masks?

Shut up, the Scientist explained.

When you mix Science and politics, all you get is politics.

My Newswithviews Column, June 11 (‘”Science” Disgraces Itself’)

See the source image

Never mind the social distancing! Let’s have a Mass Protest!

I hope you’ll all click the link to my Newswithviews column today–’cause we could actually witness the demise of science, as an avidly willing sacrifice on the altar of Far Left politics.

‘Science’ Disgraces Itself

(This computer, by the way, is giving me fits this morning. Do computers take LSD when we’re not looking?)

I think we have actually reached the point where a “scientist” will say anything, if it seems to be politically expedient. True or false, right or wrong, never enter into it.

Pagans, all of them.

The Latest Phony ‘Cause of Death’

Climate Change Disasters And Your Municipal Bonds

Nobody likes to see his pet apocalypse shoved out of the limelight by someone else’s pet apocalypse. COVID-19 has upstaged the Climate Change doomsayers, and now they want back in.

Inspired by the recent practice of corrupting death certificates by listing the Chinese Wuhan Death Virus as the official cause of death for almost every death, Climate Change wackos now want “climate change” listed as the cause of death on death certificates ( In addition to panicking the public into thinking powerful elites should “Do Something About Climate Change,” the purpose of doing this with the death certificates is explained: “death data must be coupled with large-scale environmental datasets so that impact assessments can be done.”

And they’ll want to know where to put the camps for climate change deniers.

How many apocalypses can center state accommodate?

But they all have one thing in common. They are all for the purpose of giving left-wing loons power over other people’s lives.

Top Scientist Resigns Over Climate Change Fraud

Image result for dr. judith curry

Physicist Judith Curry, chair of the Georgia Tech School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, has resigned her tenured position at the university, citing “the thoroughly politicized nature of climate science” as her reason ( ).

Dig this quote from the professor’s blog: “Research and other professional activities are professionally rewarded only if they are channeled in certain directions approved by a politicized academic establishment.” She also cited the rampant “craziness” that has infected her field of study.

Toldja! Yes, we told you so! The whole business has been corrupted by fraud and political bias. “Man-made Climate Change,” formerly known as Global Warming, is nothing but a big fat crock aimed at grabbing power and money at the public’s expense.

BTW, in searching for this story, I discovered that Professor Curry is not alone. She has a lot of company: a fair number of scientists have resigned to protest the deep corruption of “climate science.”

Told you so!

Scientists Say It’s OK to Lie for Climate Change

In April of 2014, two scientists published a peer-reviewed article in a scientific journal in which they stated that it’s perfectly acceptable to lie about “climate change” if it can get people to behave as scientists want them to behave ( ).

Don’t believe me? Fine. This is from the introduction to the article in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, by Fuhai Hong and Xianjian Zhen:

“In fact, our key result–that overpessimism alleviates the underparticipation problem–implies that the propaganda of climate skepticism–” Note that it’s the skeptics who are doing propaganda, not the confessed liars themselves–“may be detrimental to the society.” Dig those crazy euphemisms.

Another quote: “[A] rationale for the phenomenon of climate change accentuation or exaggeration [that is, lying] on the part of the international mainstream media…”–they are counting on the nooze media being in cahoots with scientists who exaggerate the effects of climate change–“… exaggeration of climate damage [that is, lying] may alleviate the problem of insufficient IEA [International Environmental Agreements] participation.”

So there you have it–scientists saying it’s okay to lie about “climate change” (known as Global Warming when the weather is hot) if the lies can be used to trick people into signing on to International Environmental Agreements.

At the time there were a number of scientists who denounced this paper in no uncertain terms. But when we hear a scientist preach about the need for tighter government controls on our behavior, because they’re needed to Save The Planet, how are we supposed to know which scientists are truth-tellers and which ones are liars?

General Principle to Follow: If a proposed policy or action will have the effect of increasing the wealth and power enjoyed by politicians and/or scientists who have already established themselves as liars and cheaters, such a policy or action should be immediately rejected.

P.S.: My friend the homicide detective says cases often solve themselves without him having to do much detecting. How? “The bad guys can’t help blabbing about what they did,” he explains. “If they don’t brag about it to some other convict, they’ll just burst. And then the other convict rats ’em out.”

Here we have the Climate Change bad guys bragging and ratting themselves out.