‘U.N. Tomfools At It Again’ (2016)

Adriana Cothran ⚓️️️🇺🇸️ on X: "@UN @antonioguterres Defund the UN and its  Corrupt Practices. China and Venezuela sits on the UN Committee for Human  Rights NGOs. This is utter hypocrisy. https://t.co/vOihd09bd6" /

The United Nations Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent–obviously this has no chance to be anything but a towering waste of time. When nations that have not yet abolished slavery demand that the United States pay “reparations” for something that stopped happening here 150 years ago, you know you are treading trails of hypocrisy that only the U.N. could have blazed.

U.N. Tomfools at It Again

As we are slowly asphyxiated by Democrat government, the rogue states of the world are licking their chops in anticipation of a feast.

Can we hold out long enough for Donald Trump to be returned to the White House?

Or have they already stolen that election?

You Can’t Satirize the U.N.

Image result for images of nicolas maduro

Human rights, anyone?

I give up: you can’t satirize the United Nations.

Why not? Because the UN satirizes itself.

A few days ago they appointed Venezuela, dictator and all, to what they laughingly call their UN Human Rights Council (https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/10/18/venezuela-returns-to-human-rights-council-month-after-u-n-condemned-maduro/). Venezuela will be replacing dear old Castro Cuba as the UN’s favorite dictatorship. Other titans of liberty and human dignity sitting on the (ahem!) Human Rights Council include Indonesia, Mauretania, Libya, and Sudan.

Not only did the UN opt for Nick Maduro’s zoo animal-eating, toilet paper-short, throw-em-all-in-jail-if-they-don’t-like-it, scads-of-people-fleeing-the-country miserable imitation of a country: they rejected Costa Rica. You know–that Central American country with durable, well-established democratic institutions, a rule of law, and other amenities. A country in which “human rights” actually exist.

Why do we continue to allow the United Nations, this towering monument to hypocrisy, squat there in the heart of New York City? Why do we continue to fund it?

Figure that one out and win a Nobel prize!

The UN Judges the US… on Human Rights

Kill the culture, and the culture is going to kill you right back.

Case in point: Decades ago, American liberals decided it would be a good thing to subsidize women in the inner cities to have children out of wedlock. The end result was the destruction of the African-American family. Today, some 70% of black children are born out of wedlock–and Martin Luther King used to agonize over it when that figure was 20% He warned us that no good could come of it, but no one listened.

So children grow up without fathers, are socialized by street gangs (and lousy schools that are controlled by gangs), and, not at all surprisingly, commit a disproportionate share of America’s crime.

Policing the cities of fatherlessness and fractional families is not an easy job, and they can’t get plaster saints to do it. So there are “incidents” of excessive force used by police… as opposed to excessive force exercised every hour of every day by gangs and individual criminals.

Voila! We now present our country to the United Nations Human Rights Council, to be judged and condemned ( http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_UNITED_NATIONS_US_RIGHTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-05-11-08-58-43 ).

This is the same UN that totally and pointedly ignores mass murder, mass torture, and lethal religious persecution in China, North Korea, the Muslim world, Africa, South America, and practically everywhere else. Nope, no problems there! But let’s thoroughly investigate the United States–you know: the stupid gavones who kick in 90% of our budget–and tell them they’ve got to abolish the death penalty (except for civilians and police officers, who may still have the death penalty imposed on them by criminals), spring all the terrorists from Guantanamo, and go real easy on the urban gangs.

Do our country’s glorious leaders tell them to go piss up a rope?

No–we grovel. Please, please, nice hobbits don’t condemn us, my precious–we promises to be good, to be as nice as fishhhh (gollum, gollum!)

Does it look to you like wrecking the black family turned out to be a good idea?

And for those who would read this as a racial parable: Exactly the same thing has happened to the urban population in Great Britain: the only difference is the skin color.

You can’t subject a culture to left-wing politics for any length of time without doing major damage to it.