Tag Archives: climate change denial as a crime

Blue Wave? What Blue Wave?

Image result for images of california tent cities

The whole nooze media is chirping about this Great Blue Wave that’s going to sweep over the country in the midterms and sweep the Democrat Party back into power.

I can’t understand why they’re so confident. Is the science of voter fraud that far advanced? I mean, what items in the Democrat goody bag are going to beguile the same electorate that put Donald Trump in the White House? What do they have to offer that we want?

California’s tent cities?

Open borders, sanctuary states?

Public funding for abortion?

Repealing the Second Amendment?

Throwing people into prison for Climate Change Denial? (Don’t sneer–it was on their 2016 platform.)

“Gays” deciding what artistic content you can’t create, or must create? (Supreme Court ruling pending)

Government promotion of the Transgender movement?

Which of these does any normal person look at and say, “Yeah, I want that”?

Or have Democrats simply charmed us with their behavior? The foul language–they sound like Linda Blair in The Exorcist–and the rioting, the attacks, sometimes physical, on anyone who dares to disagree with them, the threats, the masks, the vandals tearing down statues: is this what’s won us over? Or could it be Nancy Pelosi babbling, or Chuck Schumer saying that if we won’t elect Democrats, they’ll bring in people who will? Were those the magic words? Or is it the 24/7 college jihad against white Americans? Do we, the voters, actually enjoy being demonized and hated, and blamed for everything? Does racism appeal to us, when liberals do it?

How does any or all of this translate into some Blue Wave?

Never forgetting that the nooze media might be lying…


Article Asks, ‘Is America Having Second Thoughts About Free Speech?’

See the source image

From The Week, Feb. 12, by Damon Linker–who is against the government putting restrictions on free speech, but can’t help seeing a disturbing trend in that direction (http://theweek.com/articles/753274/america-having-second-thoughts-about-free-speech).

Who can deny it? But to his argument I would like to add the observation that the proposed limitations on speech are mostly coming at us from the Hard Left/Democrat Party–while they themselves enjoy absolute freedom to say and publish anything they want, no matter how wrong, how vicious, how inane, how jejune, how childish, how spiteful, or how mean-spirited it might be.

We Christians and our friends are expected to just suck it up, yum yum, when we hear collidge prefessers and other pinheads declare that everything we hold dear and sacred is evil and stupid, white people are responsible for all the ills of the world and must be punished for it, every “value” in play before 1990 is wrong and must be erased along with the people who hold to them, America is a racist sexist stinking country and must be punished, only black lives matter, yours don’t–and on and on and on, no end to it. The past eight years have been especially trying.

Democrats, with a straight face, propose that people be “investigated” for the Crime of Climate Change Denial. What would they say if Republican Senators huddled with a Republican attorney general and discussed RICO sanctions against persons who had committed the Crime of Climate Change Affirmation–and made that a plank in their national party platform? Think they’d be upset? Think they’d invoke their First Amendment rights?

We are expected to listen to them, or at least not try to shut them down. Let’s make that a two-way street, shall we? See, we already have a frightfully good idea of what government restrictions on free speech would look like. The Democrats and their colleges have shown it to us.

A lot of this problem would go away if the government would stop funding universities. And we would be a better country for it.


Libs Still Plotting to Jail ‘Climate Change’ Dissenters

Here we go again: libs–that is, Democrat state attorneys general (no Republicans) and other low forms of life–trying to win the “Climate Change” argument by jailing anyone who doesn’t believe in man-made Global Warming ( http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/17/democratic-ags-climate-change-groups-colluded-on-p/ ).

Here we have Democrats, aka foaming-at-the-mouth communist wannabes, trying to stifle free speech. It’s the only way they can attempt to stifle free thought. If you’re not allowed to say it, why bother thinking it? You might even lose the ability to think it.

Please try to imagine the enormity of the crime they contemplate.

In any contentious, controversial issue of public concern, they propose to silence a dissenting opinion by using the legal apparatus of the state to crush it.

In what sense, other than a totally loopy one, can the First Amendment be said to have any meaning, if this is what they do?

The nearest and most deadly threat to our civil liberties is not posed by Islamic jihad fanatics. If we only had the stomach for it, we could swat them down like bugs.

The worst threat to our liberties is our public officials and our leaders. Al-Qaeda has no power to void our Bill of Rights. But as you can see from the news story above, our own home-grown Dems are out to do that very thing.

 


TV ‘Science Guy’: Jail the Skeptics

Just in case you thought it was suddenly safe to use your brain for anything more complicated than blocking the wind from blowing through your ears, along comes Bill Nye the Science Guy (with his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering), sage and oracle, calling for prison time for those whose “extreme doubt” of Global Warming/Climate Change is “affecting my quality of life as a public citizen” ( http://www.newsmax.com/US/bill-nye-climate-change-jail/2016/04/14/id/724050/ ).

Nye joins fellow fat-head Robt. Kennedy Jr. in proposing jail time as the appropriate response to skepticism vis-a-vis “Climate Change.” Hey, hey, gotta Save the Planet, no halfway measures will do! And our fascist Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, and a number of Democrat (of course) U.S. Senators. “Yo, watch us win an argument! We’ll just throw the other side in jail!”

Remember when there used to be this thing called “reason,” and these other things called “facts,” which were supposed to be used to persuade people that this or that was right or wrong, true or false? Well, they don’t need that stuff anymore. Taking a leaf from “President” Obama’s book, they have turned to communism to “just use what works”–in this case, brute force ruthlessly applied by persons with no more morals than a bucket of mud.

Don’t forget–most of these are the same chowderheads who are always howling about there already being too many people in jail for actual criminal offenses.

Oh, well–spring the rapists, armed robbers, women-beaters, and the rest of ’em, and you’ll have plenty of prison space for Climate Change Deniers. With room left over for those who refuse to celebrate Gay Marriage.

May God  cut off this evil suddenly.

 


%d bloggers like this: