Tag Archives: liberal hypocrisy

Article Asks, ‘Is America Having Second Thoughts About Free Speech?’

See the source image

From The Week, Feb. 12, by Damon Linker–who is against the government putting restrictions on free speech, but can’t help seeing a disturbing trend in that direction (http://theweek.com/articles/753274/america-having-second-thoughts-about-free-speech).

Who can deny it? But to his argument I would like to add the observation that the proposed limitations on speech are mostly coming at us from the Hard Left/Democrat Party–while they themselves enjoy absolute freedom to say and publish anything they want, no matter how wrong, how vicious, how inane, how jejune, how childish, how spiteful, or how mean-spirited it might be.

We Christians and our friends are expected to just suck it up, yum yum, when we hear collidge prefessers and other pinheads declare that everything we hold dear and sacred is evil and stupid, white people are responsible for all the ills of the world and must be punished for it, every “value” in play before 1990 is wrong and must be erased along with the people who hold to them, America is a racist sexist stinking country and must be punished, only black lives matter, yours don’t–and on and on and on, no end to it. The past eight years have been especially trying.

Democrats, with a straight face, propose that people be “investigated” for the Crime of Climate Change Denial. What would they say if Republican Senators huddled with a Republican attorney general and discussed RICO sanctions against persons who had committed the Crime of Climate Change Affirmation–and made that a plank in their national party platform? Think they’d be upset? Think they’d invoke their First Amendment rights?

We are expected to listen to them, or at least not try to shut them down. Let’s make that a two-way street, shall we? See, we already have a frightfully good idea of what government restrictions on free speech would look like. The Democrats and their colleges have shown it to us.

A lot of this problem would go away if the government would stop funding universities. And we would be a better country for it.


Another Dirty Ol’ Man

See the source image

Liberal nooze icon Charlie Rose is the latest big-shot to be accused of sexually harassing women: eight of them, count ’em, have come forward so far, according to another left-wing nooze giant, The Washington Post (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/charlie-rose-accused-sexual-harassment-by-eight-women-1060441).

The reports say Rose, 75 years old and ought to know better, pestered the women with lewd phone calls, groping and pawing, and poncing around nude where they could see him. For a man who loves to pass himself off as Mr. Feminist, that’s gotta hurt.

Rose has apologized for his “inappropriate behavior.” And now hear this. As a result of this shambles, he says, “I have come to a profound new respect for women and their lives.” Crocodile tears!

It makes a great model for the next two or three dozen big libs who are unmasked as sexual predators. “Gee whiz, I can’t tell you how sorry I am for what I now realize wasn’t quite the ticket, behavior-wise. Like, really, I had no idea! But oh, boy, have I learned my lesson! Now I see, I really see, just how victimized women always are, and from now on, I’m in their corner all the way! Or will be, if the network only puts my show back on the air.”


Some Thoughts on Roy Moore

See the source image

I don’t want to rehash any of the rubbish floating around the nooze media today, but something ought to be said.

I have interviewed Judge Roy Moore twice. He grew up in poverty whose like I have never seen, and rose to become chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court. He lost that position, and was nationally pilloried, because he stood up for the Ten Commandments. Now he’s running for the Senate, and has been bombarded with allegations of sexual misconduct dating back to the 1970s.

The American people want the Swamp, Washington D.C., drained. The Swamp does not want to be drained and is fighting desperately, and fighting dirty, to defend itself. To that end, the whole Swamp power structure has piled onto Roy Moore–even threatening to deny him his seat if he wins the election.

Question: What has happened to all the defenses used so successfully by Democrats when it was one of their own, Bill Clinton, credibly accused of a multitude of sexual offenses? “It’s only sex, it doesn’t affect how he does his job.” “Everybody does it.” “It wasn’t really sex.” “It’s in the past, let’s just move on.” Why do none of these apply to Judge Moore?

They say the man known as “the Ten Commandments Judge” will lower the moral tone of that tower of virtue, the U.S. Senate. Well, if Ted Kennedy couldn’t do that, it can’t be done. The hypocrisy is deafening.

Question: What are they afraid of? What do they think Roy Moore, one man, with the whole Washington power elite arrayed against him, will do to them if he makes it to the Senate? Because they are afraid. I’ve never seen them running so scared. It borders on hysteria.

As to the charges made against him, I have yet to find any reason to believe them. Nor have I any reason at all to believe any charges made against anyone by such a collection of reprobates, thieves, liars, simpletons, bribe-takers, and left-wing zealots.

Think Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd doing the waitress sandwich. Think of the whole crowd extolling Ted Kennedy as “the Lion of the Senate.” I wouldn’t believe those people if they told me it was Wednesday.

One thing is sure. It’s Roy Moore versus the Swamp; and if the Swamp wins, we, the American people, lose. We lose big.

I pray for the redemption of my country.

 

 


The Ideology of Envy

Image result for images of hillary rolling in money

Say hey, remember this? Candidate Obama to Joe the Plumber: “I do think, at a certain point, you’ve made enough money.” (http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/04/i_do_think_at_a_certain_point.html)

Note the operative word is “you,” as in “you, not me.” If you are Obama, or Clinton, or Pelosi, or Kerry, or Gore, you never, never, never reach that point where you’ve made “enough money” and the government might as well just scarf up every cent you make beyond that.

And leftids buy it. Do they ever. How many times have you heard one of them complain that no one should be “allowed” to make more than a certain amount of money? And yet that never, never, never applies to Democrat politicians who get half a million bucks just for showing up to make a ten-minute speech, pouting, whining football players, air-headed movie stars, or “rap artistes.” Leftids never complain about their masters earning virtually infinite amounts of money. If you are Donald Trump, you have “too much money.” If you’re Hillary Clinton, who’s counting?

God help us, millions of us vote for these people.

They’re always yammering about Income Inequality, but I have yet to hear them propose a scheme to make my income equal to John Kerry’s, or to damp down his income until it’s equal to mine.

But then who really thinks they mean a single word they say?


California’s State Legislature–A Tar Pit of Sexual Harassment

Image result for images of drooling monster

If you want to hear “We support feminism!” till it’s coming out your ears, California’s state capitol in Sacramento would be a good place to start. Except–as is not at all unusual with liberals–it’s all a load of crap.

You know Democrats are in hot water when The New York Times has to cover their misdeeds. But according to the NYT, 140 women–including female legislators, lobbyists, and legislative aides–have signed a statement charging that the Democrat-dominated state house is a virtual hellhole of sexual harassment (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/17/us/california-women-sexual-harassment-sacramento.html).

Laments the leftist newspaper, “The California legislature has set the national agenda on a variety of issues”–that should read, “tries to set,” and, thank heaven, mostly fails–and yet here they are chasing women into the ladies’ restrooms and groping them, etc. Uh, libs, we toldja that’d happen if you didn’t keep separate bathrooms for the only two sexes that actually exist. But there it is: “pervasive sexual misconduct” in the most liberal state legislature in the union.

Okay, who’s surprised? Who’s out there who really thought liberals mean what they say about supporting this and that group’s rights and promoting social justice and being sweet enough to peel the enamel off your teeth?

Our slimy power class insults us by pretending to care about us, when in reality they consider us nothing more than their prey.

Oh, and don’t forget Hollywood as a bastion of liberal lip service with heaps and heaps of sexual predation going on behind the scenes.

And Bill Clinton.

We believe in Original Sin, which makes us perpetually in need of Our Savior.

What’s their excuse?


Hypocrisy on Steroids

Image result for images of hillary with weinstein

For this year’s Oscar for Hypocrisy, I nominate this incredible statement by Hillary Clinton, uttered five days after Hollywood producer and Democrat mega-donor Harvey Weinstein was accused of a laundry list of sexual predations:

“The behavior described by women coming forward cannot be tolerated.” (http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/354838-after-delay-clinton-and-obamas-rip-weinstein)

It leaves one breathless.

As First Lady to America’s most notorious sexual predator president, Hillary not only tolerated Bill Clinton’s behavior toward women, but enabled it, defended it, and did everything she could to smear and discredit all those “women coming forward” about her husband. She was, after all, captain of the Clinton White House’s elite Bimbo Eruption Team.

We are asked to believe that no one in Hollywood or in the Democrat Party knew about Weinstein’s, uh, hobby–is that the right word? They really didn’t know? That’s what they want us to believe?

We don’t.


Hilllary’s ‘Devotions’: Plagiarized

Image result for images of crooked hillary

Lest there be confusion, this is the same Hillary Clinton who was Planned Parenthood’s “Champion” of abortion and who said, last year, that the core beliefs of “religions”–that is, Christianity–“have got to change” to accommodate and “affirm” abortion and public sodomy.

That Hillary is the subject of a recent book, Strong for a Moment Like This: The Devotions of Hillary Rodham Clinton, by a Rev. Shillady–relish the irony of that name–the Clinton family pastor–more irony. With the thinly veiled likening of Hillary to Queen Esther, we go beyond irony into uncharted, murky waters of I don’t know what. What lies beyond irony?

The news turns out to be what we’d expect. Right smack-dab in the middle of the book is a prayer written not by Mr. Shillady–who named this guy? Charles Dickens?–but by someone else who was not given credit for it (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_HILLARY_CLINTON_PASTOR_PLAGIARISM?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-08-15-10-07-55). Usually we call that plagiarism. But as any liberal would, Mr. Shillady says it was only a mistake, nobody could have been as surprised as he was when he found out the prayer had actually been written by another man, and he’ll give the guy due credit in subsequent editions and everything’ll be just hunky-dory.

It’s raining like mad and this is what I’m reading about instead of working on my own book. I have bypassed the truly disastrous news of the day in favor of this wee tidbit of cultural decay.

I suppose we expect our politicians to be hypocrites, especially if their last name happens to be Clinton. But this is a bit thick even for Hillary. I mean, really–plagiarizing a prayer?

And we’re supposed to be sorry that she’s not our president. The nooze media all tell us so.


Hillary Climbs Mt. Hypocrisy

Image result for images of hillary clinton as richard iii

Shakespeare nailed this in Richard III, in Act 3, Scene 7. They want to talk to Richard, who has already spent the first two acts betraying and murdering his way to the throne. But they are told they can’t see him because

“He is within, with two right reverend fathers, divinely bent to meditation, and in no worldly suits will he be moved to draw him from his holy exercise.”

Fast-forward to 2017, and the publication of Strong for a Moment Like This: the Daily Devotionals of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who seems to think of herself as some kind of latter-day Esther. She wrote the forward. The book was organized by Clinton family pastor Dr. Bill Shillady, who shills for the lady. It contains 365 daily devotions “written by men of the cloth” (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/07/pastors-daily-devotions-written-for-hillary-rodham-clinton-published-she-wrote-the-foreward/)–right reverend fathers, even.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this the same Hillary Clinton who has said that Christianity “must change” to embrace abortion and homo pseudomarriage? The same Hillary Clinton who has skated over more criminal scandals than Hans Brinker skated over frozen ponds?

Naah. She is within, divinely bent to meditation.

Far be it from us to spurn anyone’s devotions. But I think we know hypocrisy when we see it, especially when it looms as high as high Olympus. This is Mount Hypocrisy, climbed all the way to the top by only a favored few.

Let the devotions be judged on their own merits. God will judge Hillary on hers. Maybe she’ll repent and be saved.

And maybe not.


Thank You, Mr. President!

Image result for images of democratic tantrum

It’s actually amazing, to see a president of the United States stand with the people who elected him. We are so used to being betrayed, ignored, insulted, etc. So when the president sides with us instead of with our predators, we are temporarily speechless with surprise.

But that’s what President Donald Trump did yesterday, when he announced that he would pulled the United States out of the bad joke that is the Paris Climate Treaty. A president siding with the American people! Almost unheard-of.

That treaty, by the way, was never ratified by the Senate as it ought to have been, but slid through via executive order,  courtesy of the last joker in the White House.

Now won’t the liberals, statists, globalists, and climate-mongers be mad!

Every villain on earth is going to be plotting to take our president’s scalp: the only ally he has is the American people. He stood by us; now we must stand by him.

O Lord our God, thank you for giving us this man to be our president! Guide him, and protect him from his enemies. In Jesus’ name, amen.

P.S.–I know this is impossible for liberals to perceive or understand, but nevertheless I’ll repeat it: Not one of the big shots who is pushing Climate Change/Global Warming acts for one minute like he believes what he’s selling. Not one! And if they don’t believe it, why should we?


Dem: Political Speech Must Be Controlled

Image result for images of suppression of free speech

Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech…”  –The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States

The former chair of the Federal Election Commission, Ann Ravel, has declared that “political speech must be controlled on social media” ( https://heatst.com/politics/former-fec-chairwoman-calls-for-regulations-of-political-speech-on-the-internet/ ).

She has attributed opposition to her scheme to “misogyny.” Well, Ann, your idea would suck just as much if you were a man.

The Constitution is the law of the land, written in language that just about anybody can understand. But we all know what Democrats and other libs think of that whole “law of the land” business. Check out their position on immigration laws.

Gee, they’d sure be unhappy if Donald Trump ever proposed controlling political speech from his end of the stick. But we all know their position on hypocrisy, too: it’s only hypocrisy when someone else does it.

If we don’t exercise and defend our freedoms, there are a lot of people who’d be only too glad to take them away from us.

They must never, ever again be allowed to take power in this country.


%d bloggers like this: