When Mere Garbage Comes Out of Your Mouth…

Trash talk stock illustration. Illustration of talkative - 24008711

Libs and other Far Left crazies really, really, really don’t like being called “groomers.” They’re furious… because the label has stuck.

So MSNBC invited some doofus who used to be with Bush-Cheney before he got woke, and he trotted out the antique cliche, “If Jesus were alive today…” Yeah. If Jesus were alive today, said Matthew Dowd (never heard of him), “he’d be called a groomer.” And “woke” and “socialist,” too. Last time I heard that, Jesus would’ve been a Red Sox Fan.

It’s a Third Commandment offense, taking the Lord’s name in vain.

Howdy-Dowdy dropped Bush-Cheney in 2007 so he could get nice TV gigs as an ex-Republican who saw the light.

But why do the libs squirm so violently when you call them groomers (as in using the public schools to “groom” young children for sexual activity)? What is it about that label that stings them so deeply?

I’m guessing that it hurts so much because it’s true. What other reason could they possibly have for wanting to teach four-year-olds all about transgender and sexual positions?

The only mystery here is why it ever was allowed at all. Maybe people weren’t watching, weren’t listening. Maybe they were even pretending that it wasn’t happening–“Not in our schools!” at least. But now the cat is out of the bag, they’ve lost their deniability: the teachers’ unions are groomers’ unions..

It’s also baffling that many more kids haven’t been pulled out of public school to protect them from the groomers. Folks, that’s the only protection that they’re gonna get.

Noozies Object to Parents’ Objections

15 Man Looking Through Hole In Paper Stock Photos, Pictures & Royalty-Free  Images - iStock

Do they really think we can’t see through this anymore?

Of course they do. They’re leftids, they only talk with other leftids, they live in a bubble, safe from contact with regular people.

So the Free Lance-Star, a noozepaper out of Fredericksburg, VA, has a recent editorial, “Parents need to learn to let go” (https://fredericksburg.com/opinion/editorial/editorial-parents-need-to-learn-to-let-go/article_9b2022da-e63c-5d5a-9d34-9b7593208eaa.html#tracking-source=home-top-story). It’s sort of a retelling of the Terry McAwful Doctrine: “Parents, shut up and let the teachers teach! You have no say in it!”

McAwful lost his bid to be elected governor, and Gov. Youngkin has kept himself busy signing new laws to protect schoolchildren from the twisted schemes of Far Left teachers’ unions. One of those laws requires notification to parents whenever a school lesson plan will delve into “sexually explicit content.”

They’re cryin’ bloody murder over that! They denounce what they call a “parental obsession with sex in books.” Sex in books, they say, is “the best our civilization has to offer.” Can you imagine that being true? Yowsah, yowsah! Bring on those award-winning books about teenage boys being sodomized by older men!

Like we don’t know where you’re coming from? Like we don’t know why mixing kids and sex is such a thing for you? You really don’t think parents should be “allowed”–yes, they said “allowed”–to object to Teacher’s lesson plans?

You clever ol’ groomers, you.

Our only objection here is that too many parents aren’t doing the one thing that’ll matter: pulling their kids out of public school. That’s the only way to protect them from those Far Left wackos in the teachers’ unions.

Yes, we see through you now. We know you want to prepare children to be sexually active at as early an age as possible. We don’t really care why you want this, although we’re pretty sure we know. We just want your dirty hands off our children. We don’t want you sniffing around our homes. In fact, we don’t want you at all.

As for the noozies who back the unions against the parents every day of the week: we don’t want you, either. It’d be pretty easy to do without you.

Libs Hate Being Called ‘Groomers’

Gender Unicorn -

Just one of many “lessons” taught in the schools by groomers

Florida now has a law prohibiting school teachers from talking sex, sex, and more sex with children in grades K-3. There is, of course, no reason why any sane person would want to do that. But leftids think it’s an evil plot to inhibit children from becoming homosexual and trannies, so they call it “the Don’t Say Gay Law” and have their knickers in a twist over it.

But why would anyone want to “teach” young children about the endless varieties of aberrant sexual behavior? “Shut up!” they explained.

Lately the term “groomers” has been catching on. More and more people use it to suggest that these “lessons” are taught to prepare children to become the sexual playthings of older perverts: “grooming” them for it. The fact that the label’s catching on suggests that the public is catching on–and doesn’t like what it sees.

So libs and teachers’ unions have been going bonkers over it, frantically objecting to that label being applied to them (https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/04/06/liberals-freak-out-over-being-called-groomers-n546263).

Well, sunshine, you reap what you sow. If you don’t want to be called groomers, stop trying to immerse very young children in your twisted visions of sexuality. For that matter, don’t do it to older children, either.

See how long the grooming lessons last, if paying school tax ever becomes optional.