So Why Have 40 Million People Stopped Going to Church?

Study: Attendance hemorrhaging at small and midsize US congregations

Not exactly crowded, is it?

The Atlantic (of all people!) asks why so many Americans don’t go to church anymore, and cites a survey of some 7,000 respondents… concluding that over the past 25 years, some 40 million of us have stopped going to church.

You could only read a few lines of the article before they said you had to subscribe if you wanted to read the rest. I have no wish to subscribe, so I’ll try to answer the question myself: Why have people supposedly stopped going to church?

I’d say the No. 1 reason is because many churches have stopped being the Church. Is your church up to its eyeballs in politics (usually Far Left politics)? Do you find the Bible hardly mentioned there? Do you hear a lot of “interfaith” drivel about all roads leading to Heaven? Does your pastor dress up as Spiderman? (I wish that were a joke. It isn’t.)

Some years ago I returned to the church that I grew up in, and requested a chat with the pastor. I got a ministerette who warned me against taking the Bible too seriously. I don’t imagine she ever did. She also referred to adultery as “no big deal.”

I’m not in California, so I haven’t encountered any churches where they do “goddess” worship or past lives.

But I am here in cyberspace; and here we share hymns, prayers, study the Bible together, and in some ways function as a church. It is a kind of assembly; and it enables us to get together despite living thousands of miles apart.

It’s simple. You bring the Pachamama idol into the church, and Christians up and leave. You do “gay weddings,” and people up and leave. You preach false gods, and Christians up and leave.

There are a lot of ways to ruin church; but the Church, Christ’s Church, will survive and conquer.

‘They Sexually Assaulted Each Other… Simultaneously?” (2018)

See the source image

Far Left Crazy culture is impossible to understand rationally. And it hasn’t gotten any better since this post was written, three years ago.

They Sexually Assaulted Each Other… Simultaneously?

Gee, remember “#MeToo”? It sort of got quietly put away after it started to chow down on big-name leftid media figures, but its inane spirit is still with us. Sexual anarchy combines with hair-trigger “sexual policing” for a really tricky culture.

Eventually they’ll want to punish you for not having sex.

No More Work? Now What’ll We Do?

See the source image

We’re hearing a lot of talk about a “post-work world” where everybody gets free money from the government and doesn’t have to work. This is the trend, they say. This is what’s ahead for us, like it or not.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/07/world-without-work/395294/

I was reading an article in The Atlantic, “A World Without Work,” and it was holding my interest until about a third of the way through, when I crashed into this quote.

“With the right government provisions… the end of wage labor will allow for a golden age of well being.”

Honk if you’ve ever heard anything stupider than that.

Hey, sunshine–what if we wind up with the wrong government provisions?

And right or wrong, what are people supposed to do if they don’t work anymore? Write symphonies? Cowboy poetry? Or maybe just lie around getting high and maybe a spot of adultery, if they can summon up the oomph for it. Oh–and where’s the money supposed to come from, to pay all these people who aren’t ever going to work again?

But then we already know what happens when government promises a golden age. If you don’t know that, how would you like to buy a one-way ticket to Venezuela?

How to Wreck What’s Left of Our Civilization

See the source image

It hasn’t made California rich, has it?

Now you can’t even stop at the Bing home page without getting hit over the head with Far Left Crazy propaganda. Yesterday it was some gonk in The Atlantic with “The Case for Getting Rid of Borders” (https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/10/get-rid-borders-completely/409501/).

He argues that abolition of national borders will make everyone in the world prosperous–nothing to rev up an economy like a wave of unassimilating, chip-on-the-shoulder aliens with values diametrically opposed to the host country’s: but what am I saying? The whole idea is for there to be no countries!

Hmm… If that were true, wouldn’t California now be the richest state in the union, instead of the poorest?

But the real stumbling block is the one the gonk never got around to mentioning.

If all the borders are erased, who’s gonna be in charge?

Do I even need to suggest what a nightmare that would be? I am assuming that if you are wicked or foolish or crazy enough to desire a global government, you’re probably not reading this. Is there anyone so infantile as to gaze trustingly at any vision of world government and mutter, “Yeah! This’ll work”?

God defend us.