Do Leftids Believe Their Own Lies?

President Obama Nominates Sen John Kerry To Be Secretary Of State Photos  and Premium High Res Pictures - Getty Images

Man, John, I never thought they’d believe that one! It was almost as out-to-lunch as one of mine!

Dennis Praeger had a thought-provoking column yesterday (https://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2021/08/17/this-is-manifestly-not-saigon-and-our-society-of-lies-n2594250) in which he concluded yes, leftists believe the manifestly false twaddle that they try to palm off on the rest of us.

How can they believe such idiocy as “A man can give birth”? Praeger explains.

For a leftist, he says, truth has no value. None at all. They are not interested in whether anything they say is true or false. And I’ll go farther than Praeger: they have no conception of truth. For them, nothing is true and everything is true. There is only that which advances their agenda and that which does not. So for them there is literally no such thing as truth.

When a liberal speaks, writes Praeger, he will never, ever ask himself, “Is what I’m saying true?” He doesn’t care. It’s the last thing in the world that would ever occur to any “progressive.”

And it’s not just politicians, not just that nest of squawking loons on Capitol Hill. It’s Big Tech, big banks, business honchos, our Free & Independent Nooze Media (they have the best claim on being the worst of the lot), our, LOL, “educators”–I mean, we are in a sea of lies! None of these people tell the truth. Ever.

Pray to the Judge of all the earth to give us the tools–and the leaders–that we need to strike the leftids’ hands from our throats.

‘Scientists Say It’s OK to Lie for Climate Change’ (2016)

See the source image

Here we had a couple of credentialed scientists, in an official scientific publication, with a peer-reviewed paper that said it’s okay to lie about Climate Change if that’s how you get people to do what you want them to do.

Scientists Say It’s OK to Lie for Climate Change

What do you get when you mix science and politics?

Politics!

Now, we’re supposed to believe them to the point of gutting our economy and giving up our liberties? Them we’re supposed to believe?

Is there anybody out there who’s not lying to us?

From the Grotesque to the Absurd:’Trans’ Boy Wins Girls’ Wrestling Title

Image result for images of transgender

“Is it a he, is it a she, or just a plain old it?” —Ray Bradbury, The Jar

Why do I insist on posting a hymn at the start of every blogging day?

Survival.

Hey! A few days ago, a “trans boy”–that is, a girl who’s being shot up full of testosterone because she and her hell-bound parents say she’s actually a boy–won the girls’ wrestling championship for the state of Texas ( http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/27/us/texas-transgender-wrestler-trnd-hold/index.html ). Note the slavish nooze media’s description of this deeply troubled individual: “born female and currently is transitioning to male.”

No, no, no. There is no such thing.

The lass says she wants to wrestle with the boys, but the state athletic authority won’t allow it. They go by the sex listed on your birth certificate. That listing, by the way, can be changed by court order. So now we’ll have judges ruling on the nature of reality. Hot dog.

Federal laws and regulations have almost wiped out high school and college wrestling programs by requiring that whatever is provided for boys, by way of sports, must be provided equally for girls. A universal lust for money has kept football exempt from this, but not wrestling. So if one girl wants to wrestle, the school must either create a girls’ wrestling program just for her, or else scrap wrestling altogether. Usually the latter course is chosen.

Consider the long-range implications of this bizarre doctrine. What about girls’ sports scholarships? The ideology of Gender Fluidity dictates that you are whatever you say you are, period. Ultimately, they won’t be able to stop some big hulking boy with a beard from winning a sports scholarship that should have gone to a girl–because he says he’s a girl, and no one’s allowed to say otherwise. That would be “hate.”

It’s no privilege to live in such an age as ours. They redefine reality according to the speaker, according to his or her political agenda. The truth is not in them.

O Lord our God! Remember, when you judge this nation, that these things were done without our consent, against our will, and over our objections.