no such thing as truth

Nhow I Seene ‘The’ Lihght!!!!

leeduigon(patty)February 11, 2022

What a lexture we hadded Yeasteday!!!! The prefesser “he” sayed,, Iff yiu “lurn Nothin elce fromb” this heer Collidge “yiu shood awt “to” Lurn this!! Lurn this!!! alll staytmints thay Are Falce!”!”!”

Nhow i Undder-stand!!!!! Nhow i Get Itt!!!!!! Nhow it awl maikes cents!!!!!!! Every Thing “that” evry Boddy says,, “it is” Awl Lyes!!!! Exsept wen it “is” Socile Juststus! And aslo wen-evver Pressadint Obomma or Hillery or Jobydin thay says it–*=be cawse Even if Thay “are” Lyieing it “is” jist the saim As Trooth!”!”!! So yiu has To beleave themb Or Elce!!!!!

Somb Hater Biggit he sayed “Iff Evry Thing it is “a” Lie then Howcum Socile Jutstus it “Is” knot A lie Tooo???”? Butt fyve (5!) of us we beet himb Up!!!! Do yiu sea How thay Twissed evvry Thing?!

Ennyhow iff Evvry Thing is “is” “a” Lie then we doughnt has to Lissen “to” no-boddy, like Nevver!!!! And “that” is goood be cose moast Of “us’ we Hait Lissining!!!!!!!

Do Leftids Believe Their Own Lies?

leeduigon(patty)August 18, 2021

President Obama Nominates Sen John Kerry To Be Secretary Of State Photos and Premium High Res Pictures - Getty Images

Man, John, I never thought they’d believe that one! It was almost as out-to-lunch as one of mine!

Dennis Praeger had a thought-provoking column yesterday (https://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2021/08/17/this-is-manifestly-not-saigon-and-our-society-of-lies-n2594250) in which he concluded yes, leftists believe the manifestly false twaddle that they try to palm off on the rest of us.

How can they believe such idiocy as “A man can give birth”? Praeger explains.

For a leftist, he says, truth has no value. None at all. They are not interested in whether anything they say is true or false. And I’ll go farther than Praeger: they have no conception of truth. For them, nothing is true and everything is true. There is only that which advances their agenda and that which does not. So for them there is literally no such thing as truth.

When a liberal speaks, writes Praeger, he will never, ever ask himself, “Is what I’m saying true?” He doesn’t care. It’s the last thing in the world that would ever occur to any “progressive.”

And it’s not just politicians, not just that nest of squawking loons on Capitol Hill. It’s Big Tech, big banks, business honchos, our Free & Independent Nooze Media (they have the best claim on being the worst of the lot), our, LOL, “educators”–I mean, we are in a sea of lies! None of these people tell the truth. Ever.

Pray to the Judge of all the earth to give us the tools–and the leaders–that we need to strike the leftids’ hands from our throats.

A Crowning Idiocy

leeduigon(patty)August 8, 2017

Image result for images of dunkirk evacuation

So the big movie this summer, so far, is Dunkirk–the story of how almost 400,000 defeated Allied soldiers were evacuated from beaches on the English Channel, by small boats, yachts, fishing boats, and every other kind of vessel you can name, rather than let them be killed or captured by the Germans.

To put it bluntly: If those men are left on the beach, the Nazis win World War II.

And if they had been lost there, a feminist jidrool would not be writing reviews complaining about what a bad movie Dunkirk is because there are too many men acting like men in it.

Mehera Bonner, whoever she is (http://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/news/a28515/dunkirk-movie-review/), calls the film a “directorial gift to men,” complains about it being “so clearly designed for men to man-out over,” and finds it “an excuse for men to celebrate maleness.” Like, dude! Pride is for gays and lesbians and trans people, ya know!

I don’t think she likes men much, do you?

Maybe if they had filled the boats with wise Latinas and trans wimmin waving “Hillary for President” banners, Ms. Bonner would have liked the movie better. That damned history! Telling us that those were all men at Dunkirk, almost all of them white… It shouldn’t be telling us things like that! That story should have been retold, this time to conform with contemporary leftid ideology! With Donald Trump as Hitler, and Rosie O’Donnell instead of Churchill, and Bruce “Call me Caitlyn” Jenner in the White House.

Well, this is what all those men fought and died to protect. Or rather, it’s what they wound up protecting, through no fault of their own.

The Postmodern War on Truth: 1992

leeduigon(patty)May 4, 2016

Michael Crichton warned us…

Last night I selected Michael Crichton’s Eaters of the Dead to read in bed, and I stumbled over this passage in Crichton’s”Factual Note” in the back of the book. Please bear in mind that this was written in 1992, twenty-four years ago.

“… [T]he tendency to blur the boundaries of fact and fiction has become widespread in modern society. Fiction is now seamlessly inserted in everything from scholarly histories to television news. Of course, television is understood to be venal, its transgressions shrugged off by most of us. But the attitude of ‘post-modern’ scholars represents a more fundamental challenge. Some in academic life now argue seriously there is no difference between fact and fiction, that all ways of reading text are arbitrary and personal, and that therefore pure invention is as valid as hard research. At best, this attitude evades traditional scholarly discipline; at worst, it is nasty and dangerous. But such academic views were not prevalent twenty years ago, when I sat down to write this novel…”

In 1972 interllecturals still admitted there was such thing as truth. By 1992, they’d changed their tune. And here, in 2016, they never tell the truth if they can help it.

Saying that there’s no such thing as truth, no such thing as an objective fact–well, I guess they think it makes them sound smart.

But there are an awful lot of stupid smart people on the loose today.