Tag: undermining the family

‘Affirming Care’ Bill Covers Everything

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

Kid With Gun Images – Browse 42,075 Stock Photos, Vectors, and Video | Adobe Stock

Coming soon, to your state: “Affirming everything!“

Gov. Gavin Noisome and the California legislature are working to craft an “affirming care” law that will require all parents to “affirm” their children’s life and career plans–and if they don’t, a court will remove the child from the family and arrange for it (?) to be raised by apes.

“It’s really quite simple,” explains Rep. Hugh Betcha. “Say your five-year-old wants to be a cowboy, and therefor requires the parents to provide him with a horse and a six-gun. Well, the law says they’ll have to ‘affirm that’ by carrying out the child’s wishes. And if they don’t…” He snickered knowingly.

A panel of public school teachers, appointed by teachers’ union bosses, will meet regularly to decide which of their students’ parents are fit to continue being parents. If they don’t make the grade, said Betcha, “Well, you just won’t see them around anymore.”

With a twinkle in his eye, the governor laughed off efforts to stop the bill in committee.

“Once you’ve got the voting machines under control,” he chuckled, “you can do whatever you want!”

‘Teacher’ Won’t Explain Why She Made Boy Wear Dress

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

[Thanks to “OhioChessFan” for the nooze tip]

When I was in elementary school, it was not unusual for a “teacher” to humiliate a child in front of the class. It was a form of punishment. I don’t know if that’s what was going on here. No explanation is offered by the “teacher.”

In the background we can see a cross on the wall, indicating that this may be someone’s idea of a religious school. We are sorry to say that some of our supposedly Christian schools seem to be tainted with the same stupid wickedness that has consumed our public schools. (If it is a religious school, though, the teachers might not be unionized and it just might be possible to fire one. Worth a try, at least!)

Anyway, here’s a grandfather demanding to know why his grandson’s “teacher” made the boy wear a dress in class, two days in a row. And he can’t get an answer! “You have to talk to my director.” “I can’t talk to you, you’re not on the [unintelligible].”  She is unhappy that the frustrated man has raised his voice: she warns him not to do that “in front of my children.”

Whoa! Lady, these are not your children–and we would all like to know why you made a boy wear a dress. Is that something you learned in teachers’ college? And who gave you the right to stonewall the child’s grandfather? Does this have something to do with “fundamental transforming” of America? Maybe your fundament needs some transforming.

It’s getting so the only place where your children are safe is the family home–and that’s the best classroom, too.

 

 

More ‘Sex Ed’–and More Opposition

Posted By: leeduigon(patty)Posted On:

NJ Education

I’d like to stop covering these stories, but the nooze won’t let me.

We told you, years ago, that once they got started with “comprehensive sex education,” they wouldn’t stop. They got the camel’s nose into the tent, and now they’re pushing in the hump.

The latest victim of the “educators” is the people of New Jersey, who were surprised when the state Board of Education suddenly laid a new, expanded “sex ed” curriculum on them (https://www.phillyvoice.com/new-jersey-gender-identity-sex-education-standards-governor-murphy/). The educators were surprised when people called it “outrageous.”

Mixing children with sex has become a thing for them. They push it like their lives depended on it. Now opponents of the new sex ed curriculum are demanding public hearings on it. The curriculum was planned to go into effect this fall.

But not to worry! They’ll use “gender neutral pronouns.” Don’t you feel safer already?

But hey, folks–we gave them this power. We allowed them to dig deeper and deeper into our families’ private business. Just pack little Johnny off to public school each weekday, go off to work and forget about it. And now we know that was a very bad idea.

You have to take your children out of public school–unless you really want those wackos in the teachers’ unions to sexualize your children. I mean, when they’re not busy “teaching” Critical Race Theory (did you know you’re all racists?), socialism, and all that citizen of the world baloney.

You can see now that they’re not going to stop. But they can’t do it if no one’s in the classroom.