Why a Devestated National Economy Is Good for You

I knew it would be only a matter of time before our glorious national leaders told us that, even as Global Warming makes the weather cold, and wet wood burns the best, so their war against prosperity would enrich us.

So who cares that the Congressional Budget Office predicts that Obamacare will destroy 2.5 million full-time jobs in America? Why, it’s a blessing in disguise! Ask any leading Democrat.

Being out of work, the Senate Majority Leader tells us, is just a form of “free agency.” You know–like in baseball, when you’re a free agent, you get boxcar-loads of money to join up with a team.

Being out of work, the former Speaker of the House tells us, will give you time to “write poetry.”

And best of all–and they’re all saying this, all of a sudden–unemployment is so much better than “job-lock.”

Job-lock? What’s that?

Well, it’s having to work for a living, and not being able to stop and lie around on the couch and watch TV. Obamacare will free 2.5 million able-bodied Americans from job-lock. Or, as that other dimwit said a couple of weeks ago, it’s long past time we made “participation in the work-force truly voluntary.”

As long as you don’t need money, why work? It’s just not fair, that you should need money to live! Free stuff for all! Free living quarters, free food, free phones, free video games! Lemme at that goose-quill pen–I feel a major poem coming on!

All my stuff, it should be free:/ I oughta be paid for bein’ me.

Why should I have to go out and work,/ When I can just live off some other jerk?

How many of you out there are willing to keep on working so that I can keep on writing poetry?

Fight job-lock! Get unemployed today!

‘Leading Writers,’ Useful Idiots

The Telegraph reports this morning that “more than 200 leading writers” have denounced Russia’s law against “gay propaganda”–over here we call it “television” or “public education”–and blasphemy ( http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/10620893/More-than-200-leading-writers-protest-against-Russia’s-anti-gay-and-blasphemy-laws.html ).

What writers? The usual gang of idiots–Serious Mainstream Literature stuffed shirts who couldn’t tell a proper story if their lives depended on it.

They say that a law against trying to convince children that homosexuality is good, and a law against blasphemy, are “a threat to freedom.” Well, yeah, I guess an anti-blasphemy law might restrict some precious nitwit’s “liberty” to utter blasphemy–this from the same left-wing academic thought police who want to string you up if you dare say a single world that isn’t Politically Correct, and duly reverent of certain cherished Minorities. You have a “liberty” to offend people who believe in God, but if you say anything that makes a “gay” or a lesbian or a feminist “uncomfortable”–well, you’ve had it.

Whose freedom, nowadays, is being threatened, by the way?

Every day there’s a news report of some arm of the government, somewhere, coming down like a sledge-hammer on some little, ordinary person who made the fatal mistake of not jumping when a lesbian said “jump.” According to the practice of government and the passion of our ruling class, “gays” have been made superior to regular people: they are to be appeased at all times, and never crossed. Woe betide you if you do!

Well, this writer ain’t buyin’ it.

Religious Liberty? What Religious Liberty?

Organized Sodomy is at it again. Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) has filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts to force a Roman Catholic school to hire a sodomite who is “married” to another man ( http://b.globe.com/1n16Gqg ).

Given that marriage is a holy sacrament of the Catholic Church, for the school to hire a person who takes part in a mockery of the sacrament would be to join with him in the mockery.

In 2012, in Hosanna-Tabor Church vs. the Equal Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the federal government’s efforts to force a Lutheran School to hire a teacher who was not wanted. The frothing-at-the-mouth anti-Christian Obama administration couldn’t even get Ginsberg to go along with them on that one.

Here, Organized Sodomy’s claim has been filed with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination.

You would think the weight of that much hypocrisy would sink the whole state into the ground.

Hello, America–where does this end? How far must it go before it ends?

You tell me.

A Lesson in Wastefulness

One of the swell features of growing up in the 1950s was, your mother would serve you canned wax beans or weary meat loaf for supper, you’d sit there staring at it, and she would say, “Don’t you know that there are children starving in Korea/India/Europe? Stop fussing and clear your plate!”

As tiresome as this was, it did teach a moral lesson. Food is the gift of God. To waste it, knowing that there are many people who really are starving, is a sin. I don’t mean you should force your children to eat wax beans. But food should be respected.

Which brings us to Uintah Elementary School in Utah, where, recently, school employees snatched away the lunches from some 50 kids and threw the food into the garbage, because it was discovered that these children owed money for school lunch (see http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/31/utah-school-takes-lunches-from-students-in-debt.html?_r=1 ). Right in front of a whole lunchroom full of children, adults took the uneaten, untouched food and tossed it.

What lesson did that teach?

Well, we already know that public schools are run by moral imbeciles who concentrate on teaching the three S’s–sex, self-esteem, and socialism. So why wouldn’t they waste perfectly good food?

Utah, wake up! Unless you do something about your public schools, your red state is going to be turned blue. The same teacher unions that control education in Progressive wildernesses like New Jersey, Oregon, and Chicago control the schools in Utah. They are teaching your children to be aliens.

Do something about it.

[Sorry, the link to the Jan. 31 New York Times article doesn’t work. It is not my fault.]

Bill Ayres, Bilge-Master

Sort-of conservative Dinesh D’Souza last night squared off in a debate with domestic terrorist, Obama mentor, and revered “educator” Bill Ayres. No, I didn’t watch it. That’s because I can read. So I read all about it this morning.

Ayres says he doesn’t want to bomb public buildings anymore (so where do we put the statue?), but there are still plenty of things wrong with America that need to be fixed.

For instance, not enough people vote. You coulda fooled me–I think too many people are voting, too many times. But the old bomber is upset that felons in jail aren’t allowed to vote. They would be a natural addition to the Democrat voting base. He says too many votes are “suppressed.” What bunk.

He doesn’t think we Americans have been punished sufficiently for having slavery that ended 150 years ago.

You know what? I don’t care. My ancestors were enslaved by the Romans. What special favors do I get for that?

Ayres says the “great thing about America” is its endless supply of activists and protesters, etc. Bomber Bill is well known as an admirer/groupie of Hugo Chavez and others of that stripe. Why didn’t anyone ask him, “Hey, stupid–if your crowd was running the country, how many activists and protesters and dissenters would be allowed to complain about your policies?” The only honest answer, of course, would be zero.

Why was this exercise in sophistry and silliness even put on television? Have they run short of Huckleberry Hound reruns? I mean, why would Ayres even argue America wasn’t great? It’s been a very, very good country to him! Where else could you rise from having your picture on an FBI poster in every local post office, to being exalted and well-paid as an “educator,” guru to a brainless chump who becomes president, and TV star? As far as he has been concerned, what’s not to like?

Is there anyone in public life today who is not a turkey?

UK Bank Won’t Let Customers Withdraw Their Money

Suppose someone owed you money. What would you think if you asked him to pay up, and he replied, “What do you want it for?” “Well,” you might say, “I want to make some repairs on my car.” And what would you think if he said, “Sorry, that’s not a good enough reason”? And he wouldn’t let you have your money.

You’d think something was fishy, wouldn’t you–like maybe his bookie has your money, and he won’t pay you because he doesn’t have it anymore?

A few days ago, customers of the HSBC Bank, in Britain, were stunned when tellers wouldn’t let them withdraw “large sums”–whatever that means!–of their own money, unless they told the bank what they wanted it for and the bank decided it was a good reason. (See http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/25/hsbc-moneybox_n_4664439.html ) It’s a new “policy.” Somehow the word “policy” has come to mean “We’re screwing you and we won’t stop, so take a hike.”

What gives here? What’s going on that we’re not being told about? In conjunction with assorted world leaders and big shots floating trial balloons about switching over from freedom to communism, and doubling down on Global Warming in the middle of the coldest winter in 100 years, and the whole Western world’s ruling class trying to exalt homosexuality to a privileged status, this business with the bank is more than fishy–it’s downright ominous.

What are these people up to, our glorious rulers?

I don’t know. But I’m sure it won’t be very pleasant, finding out.

Ninnie Links ‘Climate Change’ to ‘Income Inequality’

As yet another host of globalist nincompoops gathers at Davos, Switzerland, a boob named Aron Cramer, representing Business for Social Responsibility, solemnly informs the world that Global Warming is “directly linked” to the great progressive bugaboo of “Income Inequality” (see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/22/aron-cramer-davos_n_4642423.html?ref=topbar ).

Libs ‘n’ progs are creating a unified field theory of pure idiocy, binding into one great bale of drivel Global Warming, Income Inequality, Homophobia, and a return to good old-fashioned Communism. Put ’em all together, and you get an earthly paradise.

Everyone who goes to these wing-dings at Davos is as rich as Croesus. Hey, Aron Knucklehead–when are you going to send me a big fat check to make my income equal to yours?

How has it ever come to pass that such an army of hypocrites, liars, and fools has so much money, so much power, and so much influence? Where do they get these people?

Is anyone really, truly stupid enough to believe that, if governments apply enough coercion, there could actually be “Income Equality”? Can this be achieved by a gang of incredibly rich left-wing dorks wielding untrammeled dictatorial powers?

Remember Michael Jordan? He doesn’t play basketball anymore; but over the years, without going to Davos, without presuming to lecture the rest of the world, without setting himself up as an oracle of secular wisdumb, Michael Jordan has given away some $350 million to assorted charities. Betcha that’s many times more than the whole crowd at Davos put together.

Why don’t these rich, elitist gasbags simply give away their money? For the cost of fueling Aron Cramer’s private jet, you could live like a king.

Honestly, sometimes you could just sit down and weep.

U.N. Ninnie: Communism Can Save the World from Global Warming

The new United Nations climate honcho, Christiana Figueres, says “democracy” isn’t fit for fighting Global Warming. If we really wanna Save the Planet, we gotta turn to… communism!

Is she purposely trying to satirize herself? Not only is communism the best way to fight Global Warming, she says: but China ought to be the world’s role model. China? The biggest polluter on earth–that China? Where you can practically cut the air with a knife and pile it in stacks? Yup, that China.

Where do they find these people? Well, Ms. Figueres, born in Costa Rica, is a lifelong bureaucrat from a family of bureaucrats, and for many years has been a paid Global Warming-monger. In other words, she has spent her entire life totally insulated from reality. No wonder she doesn’t believe in democratic institutions! She’s never been introduced to one.

Yowsah, yowsah, communism is the answer. Re-open the gulags. Get them re-education camps back into gear.

Did you know that, under communism, a single cubic yard of Polish soil contained enough lead to make a lead soldier?

Did you know that, under the genius of the USSR’s central planners, they practically dried up the Aral Sea–once one of the world’s largest lakes?

For more on communism’s sterling environmental record, see http://hotair.com/archives/2014/01/16/un-climate-chief-declares-communism-best-for-fighting-global-warming/ .

“But, dahling, it won’t be communism for me!”

A Free Ride for Every Drone?

Continuing our examination of Jesse Myerson’s idle brain farts, as published by Rolling Stone, we come to the second of his “Five Economic Reforms Millenials Should Be Fighting For.”

“2. Social Security for All.” No, he doesn’t mean SS benefits. So you don’t accuse me of creating a straw man, let him explain it in his own words.

“[A]s much as unemployment blows, so do jobs. What if people didn’t have to work to survive? Enter the jaw-dropping simple idea of a universal basic income…” It’s simple, all right. You sit around playing video games, and the government deposits $10,000 in your bank account. Because Mr. Myerson is an ignoramus, he doesn’t address the question of where that money is to come from.

He goes on to quote a professor, some academic dolt, who explains that, instead of work, this government bounty will give its recipients “time to cultivate new needs for pleasure, activities, passions… that exceed the options of working and saving, producing and accumulating.” Amen, echoes Myerson: this will “make participation in the labor force truly voluntary.”

Myerson has this forum in Rolling Stone because he was a leader in Occupy Wall Street. This tells us two things about him. 1. He is college-educated, and 2. he is a college-educated imbecile. How much public money has been spent to “educate” him? All that time and effort, and this is what we get?

Am I alone in seeing in these notions something that more than quietly smacks of deep immorality? Not to mention danger.

Hello! Who is going to keep on working if all around him he sees lazy brain-dead sods being paid for doing nothing?

Oh, they won’t be lazy! No–they’ll be using their unlimited free time to explore new passions.

Like I said–dangerous. Wicked, inane, and dangerous.

How Dumb Can You Get?

Not since some academic wing-wong chastised David Attenborough for not showing homosexual animals in his nature documentaries have we seen anything so asinine as the Jan. 3 column in Rolling Stone by one Jesse Myerson, “5 Economic Goals Millenials Should Be Supporting,” or some such tripe.

I want to spend some time on this because it clearly shows just how much trouble we’re in, that anyone could be paid good money for cranking out such balderdash, or that an established magazine would publish it.

Today let’s look at “1. Guaranteed Work for Everybody,” which displays the vacuum existing inside Myerson’s cranium. This well-paid commentator understands nothing, knows nothing. Certainly he has no idea of the purpose of work, no conception of how wealth is created. But he’s writing for Rolling Stone and you’re not.

Myerson says there ought to be “a public-sector job guarantee.” I wonder if that would come with the kind of pensions that usually accompany public sector jobs. How would that be paid for? He doesn’t entertain the question. He’s probably not capable of asking it.

What kinds of jobs would these guaranteed jobs be? Moving sand piles? Digging and filling in holes? Would you get to pick the kind of job you want, or would the government choose it for you?

Myerson actually suggests these otherwise workless people be given publicly subsidized jobs like “painting murals–” yes, he really says that–“rather than telemarketing or whatever other stupid tasks bosses need done to supplement their millions.”

Could anything be more ignorant? Could anything be more juvenile? And this is just one of five trophies of stupidity displayed by Mr. Myerson: I don’t have space for the others.

Look, folks: I don’t know about you, but the thought that public opinion in America is actually influenced by dunderheads like Mr. Myerson is a profoundly scary one. This truly is the blind leading the blind; and it cannot possibly turn out well for us.