‘A New Low for CNN’ (2017)

40 Newspaper Headlines That Push The Limits Of Human Stupidity | DeMilked

Why do so many of us detest “journalists”? Maybe it’s because they despise us and take it for granted that we’re way, way, way too stupid ever to see through any of their ham-fisted sophomoric tricks.

Like this one:

A New Low for CNN

Yeah, ain’t that just too cute for words? “Sarah, does this administration [Donald Trump’s] believe slavery is wrong?” Oooh, I’ve got her, she’s toast! 

God help me, I used to be a reporter! And an editor. But I think I can honestly say that what passes for everyday journalistic practice these days would have been laughed out of the room as comically unprofessional, back in the 1970s.

At least the local journalists were honest.

‘Live By the Sword, Die By The Sword’ (2019)

See the source image

I remember a time when news reporters were… well, kind of admired for the job they did. I wanted to be one when I grew up (which I did, by and by).

Now they’re pretty much loathed. Here’s why.

Live by the Sword, Die by the Sword

See? A man sets up a charity, out of the goodness of his heart, and some “journalist” tries to destroy him. Happily in this case, it was the “reporter” who wound up getting canceled.

They really do have no idea why we detest them, do they?

 

Facebook: ‘Journalists’ (LOL) Now a ‘Protected Class’

50 Cute Puppy Pictures That You Need to See — Puppy Pictures | Reader's  Digest

Will they censor happy puppies, too?

Facebook has decided to make “journalists”–and some “activists,” too–a “protected class,” shielded, they say, from “harassment and bullying” (https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62614).

That means the, um, “journalists” can write and publish anything they want about anybody–but no one will be allowed to return the favor. Facebook’s “global safety chief” (aw, gimme a break!) says they’ve got to protect them from people who say mean things about them.

We have never in our history seen such shabby, slanted, stupid, careless nooze reporting as we see today. No one has damaged the journalists’ reputation anywhere near as much as the journalists themselves. But look, it’s getting too hot in the kitchen, and the noozies just can’t take it. So Facebook will protect them. Our Free & Independent Democrat Nooze Media deserve protection!

Maybe Facebook ought to buy them some Play-Doh, too.

Don’t ‘Reporters’ Understand Anything?

Journalist Stock Pictures, Royalty-free Photos & Images - Getty Images

(Even a fool can be thought wise–if he can only keep his mouth shut! –King Solomon)

I never went to journalism school. I cannot confirm reports that before they let you graduate, they suck your brain out through a straw.

At President Trump’s press briefing yesterday (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QZmMWSVw_4), he mentioned that the United States had just acquired “good intelligence” that Iran was planning a sneak attack on some of our people in the region. The president warned Iran not to do it: “If anything bad happens, it’s going to be very painful for the other side.”

Okay, that’s a threat. Its purpose was to deter Iran from launching an attack. If the threat succeeds, then a lot of people won’t die.

Good luck trying to find a “journalist” who understands that.

So the reporter suggests to the president that maybe his statement was tantamount to giving the bad guys “a heads-up,” and asks him if he “feels” that maybe that’s what he did.

Do you really have to be a genius to understand that threats are meant to prevent actions from being taken? A sign on a park bench that says “Wet Paint” threatens unhappy consequences to anyone who sits on the bench. So you don’t sit on the bench. Is this truly beyond the intellectual powers of a journalist?

And they wonder why the public increasingly detests them.