So we’re in the hot-as-hades car this morning, en route to the supermarket, and listening to the canned nooze on the radio.
President Trump gave a speech this weekend in which he said America wasn’t going to stand for rioting, violence, and civil disorder. They played the clip. We heard him say it.
And then the noozie comes on and says the president came out against “peacefully protesting injustice.”
But that was not what he said! And it’s certainly not what’s going on in Democrat cities nationwide. “Peacefully protesting injustice”! Do they think we’re retarded? Do they think we don’t speak English? They show us the video of the rioting and then they call it “peaceful protest”! Honestly, that’s not even sane. We’re getting our news from crackpots.
It won’t be enough just to win this year’s elections.
Annihilate the Democrat Party. Put it and its horde of Far Left playmates out of business forever.
After fighting the Wehrmacht, he wasn’t about to surrender to the rioters.
Remember the Paris riots of 1968? Far Left Crazy very nearly toppled the government of France.
But President Charles DeGaulle had been through worse than this. In 1940 he fought the panzer divisions invading his country. For the next five years he led the Free French. Those were dark days. Much darker than 1968.
DeGaulle refused to buckle. When all else failed, he put the military on high alert and managed to hold a special election. In that election, the sane and normal people in France gave his party an overwhelming victory. And the rioters faded back into the woodwork.
We need President Donald Trump to be as strong as DeGaulle. For a time in 1968, DeGaulle stood alone between France and anarchy. We need to rally around our president.
We can’t afford to lose this war. We’d lose our whole country, and I doubt we’d ever get it back.
Section 230 of the act which exempts the social media from being held liable for any damages incurred because of the content that they post, the Communications Decency Act, does not allow the social media to make “editorial decisions” regarding users’ content. But in recent years, the president said, the social media have disregarded that regulation and become, he said, “nothing more than a political activism group.”
Attorney General William Barr is preparing legislation to put an end to social media censorship.
It’s about time.
Somehow it’s only conservative opinion that ends up getting banned as “hate speech,” only conservative websites that wind up getting shut down or temporarily silenced. We all wanted an Internet that was free of censorship, but we haven’t got it. If the proposed regulations get signed into law, Big Tech will have only itself to thank.
The social media have evolved into a resource used by everyone, but everyone doesn’t get the same treatment. We are not generally in favor of inventing new regulations, but the situation with the social media has gotten out of hand. I shouldn’t have to use a picture of happy puppies every time I want to discuss something deemed controversial. If I don’t, Facebook censors me.
The former Sandinista who’s now the mayor of New York said, not long ago, that if he had his druthers, “Government would determine your day-to-day reality.”
President Trump turned out better than I dared to hope, and I can’t wait to vote for him again. But why do leftids say they’re Christians? Does anybody still believe them? Abortion, transgender, homosexuality, fomenting racial strife, in bed with atheism and Islam–how do they get away with it?
Just as Khrushchev once predicted, communism will bury us–if we don’t bury it first. And burying communism means burying the Democrat Party.
So I saw what I didn’t expect: some nonentity of a “reporter” trying to talk over the president of the United States. He just wouldn’t shut up. Like, Dude, who the hell are you? What kind of feral fool just keeps yakking away while the president is speaking? Who do these journalistic nimrods think they are?
How do you interview anyone if you won’t stop talking yourself? Many years ago, I was at a governor’s briefing. Those of us who had questions asked them–and listened to the answers. That’s how we were able to report on what the governor said. We were, I think, a dozen reporters. We didn’t just keep talking.
But that was then, this is now, and our free and independent press’ only mission in life is to damage Donald Trump and try to boost Democrats back into power. They want to do this because they’re idiots: no one with any more sense than God gave an umbrella stand wants Democrats in charge of anything.
It’s not only lousy reporting, to try to drown out the person you’re supposed to be interviewing. It’s also bad manners. To show that much disrespect for the president is shameful.
I admit I had, and have, no respect at all for the previous president; I don’t even like to type his name. But I’m not all over the airwaves, live, showing my disrespect.
Let them write what they please. But if they can’t behave themselves in public, then they shouldn’t be allowed out in public.
(Even a fool can be thought wise–if he can only keep his mouth shut! –King Solomon)
I never went to journalism school. I cannot confirm reports that before they let you graduate, they suck your brain out through a straw.
At President Trump’s press briefing yesterday (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QZmMWSVw_4), he mentioned that the United States had just acquired “good intelligence” that Iran was planning a sneak attack on some of our people in the region. The president warned Iran not to do it: “If anything bad happens, it’s going to be very painful for the other side.”
Okay, that’s a threat. Its purpose was to deter Iran from launching an attack. If the threat succeeds, then a lot of people won’t die.
Good luck trying to find a “journalist” who understands that.
So the reporter suggests to the president that maybe his statement was tantamount to giving the bad guys “a heads-up,” and asks him if he “feels” that maybe that’s what he did.
Do you really have to be a genius to understand that threats are meant to prevent actions from being taken? A sign on a park bench that says “Wet Paint” threatens unhappy consequences to anyone who sits on the bench. So you don’t sit on the bench. Is this truly beyond the intellectual powers of a journalist?
And they wonder why the public increasingly detests them.
I have to ask why their approval rating is so high. All they do is scare stories and Trump bashing, plus a bit of covering for China. And imagine how much higher the president’s rating would be if the whole nooze media weren’t savaging him every day and every night.
At the top of the list stands our nation’s hospitals, with 88 percent approval.
Democrats and media–it’s getting so you can’t tell them apart anymore–are rooting for the Chinese Wuhan Communist Death Monster to ravage our economy and make a lot of people sick, thinking it’s their best chance to get some socialist psycho into the White House. When the president and the Senate tried to give back almost $2 trillion to the American taxpayers to tide them over till better days, House Democrats tried every trick they know to stop it.
Their own rescue package was nothing but a Far Left Crazy wish list, full of costly garbage that had absolutely nothing to do with solving the crisis–including a devastatingly wicked scheme to subvert our elections with mail-in voting, public funding for abortion, and–holy cow–mandatory “diversity” quotas for corporate boards, just to name only three of many wacko schemes. So far they haven’t succeeded with it, God’s providence be praised.
But who are those 44% who approve of the nooze media? I don’t know, maybe you could get 44% approval for the virus itself.
We pray that this crisis will soon be over-past: and that we will have learned important lessons from it–like not trusting communist China, bringing our medical manufacturing back to America, and never again, never again, entrusting Democrats with power. In Jesus’ name, Amen.
This bullfrog has nothing to do with the post. It’s just a nice picture of a bullfrog.
Actually, that’s not such a hard question to answer: everything’s closed. I guess I’ll just go outside and have a cigar, and maybe check up on the progress of Quokka University–which is not closed, because it hasn’t opened yet.
I just read an article by some “true conservative” I never heard of, saying that, although President Trump has done a lot of things right, he’s still just a New York liberal at heart, who has no “deep core of true conservatism,” blah-blah. What a lot of schiff.
Who are the “true conservatives”? They’re the ones who are absolutely nowhere to be found whenever liberals are trashing our country and debauching our culture. Live birth abortion? Transgender rights? Same-sex fake marriage? For all these fights and more, “true conservatives” are to be found off on a cruise ship somewhere. Reminds me of a movie called “Ship of Fools.”
What have these self-anointed “true conservatives” ever conserved? I mean, look at us! We now have “Drag Queen Story Hour.” Anybody here from any “true conservatives” over that? The moment there’s a battle to be fought, they’re outta here.
Donald Trump has done more practical conservative action than the whole tribe of “true conservatives” put together with RINOs thrown in.
To put this in some kind of perspective, Pelosi is from San Francisco. Is that what she calls “civilization”? Piles of feces on the sidewalk. Used syringes all over. Crime rate through the ceiling. Hordes of the homeless, most of them illegal aliens, in tents and cardboard boxes.
Does she know what “civilization” means? She’s from San Francisco.
This is the third-highest ranking official in America, behind only the president and vice president. This is what we’ve settled for.
Pray America’s voters put the Democrat Party out of business and Pelosi out to pasture–or wherever you go, if you can’t lead the House of Reprehensibles anymore.