Something tells me we’re going to see and hear things this election cycle which will make 2016 seem like a church service.
This whole technique of “divide and rule,” setting people at each other’s throats, is what keeps the Democrat Party in business. As long as whole groups of citizens hate and fear each other, the Party is alive and well.
Please remember this: They don’t care what happens to our country, as long as they come out on top.
That must never happen again.
The do-over was even worse.
Hoo boy! Remember this?
Unable to imagine how their idol, Hillary Clinton, could have lost the 2016 presidential election to hated-by-all-the-smart-people Donald Trump, a couple of professors at New York University, in 2017, staged a creative experiment (https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=8889).
To test their theory that Hillary only lost because hateful stupid American voters were prejudiced against a woman, the profs re-enacted the presidential debate as close to verbatim as possible, down to facial expressions and hand gestures–with one difference. In the re-enactment, Donald Trump is a woman and Hillary Clinton is a man.
Imagine their horror when the audience found Hillary even more revolting as a man–downright “punchable,” one woman said–and Trump even more likeable as a woman.
So much for their theory. See? There is such a thing as a dumb political scientist.
I only refer back to this weird incident because I and several other observers think there’s a good chance Hillary will again be the Democrats’ presidential candidate.
She has not gotten more likeable since 2016. Let’s hope she takes the whole evil party down in flames with her.
Fun for… who?
I can’t see how I could have missed this story, back in 2015. Maybe the nooze media swept it under the rug.
Hillary Clinton, already anointed by the noozies as the odds-on favorite to succeed President *Batteries Not Included, said (at the time), “We have a huge fun deficit in America… We really need camps for adults” (http://www.truthandaction.org/clinton-need-put-adults-fun-camps-re-education/2/).
I listened to the video several times and did not hear her use the word “re-education.” Instead, she stressed that adults need “fun” and that such camps might provide it for them.
When contemplating a Hillary Clinton presidency, the word “fun” is not one that springs to mind. Unless it’s staking someone down on top of a fire ant mound, or something like that.
I concede the possibility that this was just idle talk from a gasbag politician, put the mouth on cruise control while the brain shuts down. But is that a habit we want to encourage in our presidents?
What this wicked woman said in 2015 has a bearing on 2020–because some of us think she’s running again, and, with only little left-wing munchkins to oppose her, she might again become the nominee.
Think she’ll mention “camps” again?
At this point we can’t say anything’s too far out there for a Democrat to endorse.
Don’t let this happen to your country!
I first said several months ago that Hillary Clinton was going to run for president again, and since then, a lot of commentators have joined me in that opinion. Remember what a great run she made of it last time?
(Yeah, Hillary–go on, do it! This time it’ll work! This time the Deep State will see to it that you win! Last time was just a fluke. Go on, do it!)
As many times as it takes to drive the Democrat Party into the ground for good, that’s how many times I hope she runs.
But I don’t want anybody getting so overconfident in 2020 that they stay home, or vote for a third-party candidate, or do anything that could possibly be construed as helping the Democrats get their dirty hands back around our country’s neck. ‘Cause this time they won’t let go.
I don’t much like that word, “values.” It leads into stupid discussions like the one Ted Cruz started in 2016.
I mean, come on–what are “values”? The word takes us another step away from good vs. evil, right vs. wrong. After all, everybody has his own “values.” You don’t have to wait long before the term becomes meaningless.
You won’t find “New York values” in the Bible–or anybody else’s “values,” either. We are to seek what God values.
“Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord? or who shall stand in his holy place? He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart: who hath not lifted his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully” (Ps. 24:3-4).
God doesn’t care what your “values” are.
I’ve become convinced that liberals and leftids literally cannot see the devastation wrought by their inside policies.
And I think we must regularly remind ourselves how blessed we were that Hillary Clinton did not become our president.
Next year we’ll have another chance to ruin our republic by electing some other far-out Democrat wacko. Our nooze media, Big Tech, Hollywood, and all the rest of them will do their damnedest to make sure it happens.
God help us if it does.
I like to think of how much it hurt to publish that.
Move over, Nostradamus! Dig this line I wrote and published on June 4, 2016:
This is why Donald Trump is going to be our next president.
And how many highly-paid pundits were writing that, back then?
(I must be feeling better. Well, I am! Thanks, everybody, for your prayers.)
Here’s the post in which I wrote that deathless line.
“The Worst Lady” was about the Obamas and Hillary Clinton and other Democrat schmendricks wining about what tough lives they have. Donald Trump, also fabulously wealthy, at least spent his own money, not ours.
This is well worth saving!
It there’s one thing that elitists truly despise, it’s ordinary people: the people who keep the country going, day to day.
This was written leading up to the 2016 election, in which by the grace of God we were spared an irredeemable disaster.
And next year we’ll have to go through the whole damned thing again! We’re always just one election away from being sunk for good.
The Democrat Party still disdains and disrespects ordinary people. Their attitude is still “Just shut up and pay your taxes, peasants!” They are still convinced that by cobbling together a coalition of chip-on-the-shoulder “minorities,” they don’t need the rest of us.
And they still must be defeated, defeated again, if we are not to lose our country.
Lest they do to your town what they’ve done to Detroit, San Francisco, Gary, Camden, and the list goes on forever…
Why isn’t this man rich?
Somehow “income inequality” failed to become the hot campaign issue of the 2016 election–probably because it looks so freakin’ ridiculous when some gazillionaire politician complains about it and says that you, the hard-pressed taxpayer, ought to shell out more money so they can lavish it on ne’er-do-wells and sluggards.
Why do people in government make such preposterously extravagant claims? “We’re gonna create income equality! We’re going to stop the climate from changing! We’re gonna to direct the course of human evolution!”
Are these people quite all there?
And what’s wrong with us, that we allow liars and mountebanks to lord it over us?