UK Doctors Forbidden to Call Mothers ‘Mothers’

Image result for images of doctor with gag

All right–this has gone quite far enough, and it has to stop.

The British Medical Assn. has decreed that physicians in the UK stop using the word “mother” to denote a mother, and no longer to use the term “expectant mothers,” but to say “pregnant people” instead ( http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/01/29/doctors-told-term-mothers-offends-trans/ ). These barbarities are to be inflicted on the English language so as to avoid giving offense to intensely disturbed individuals who call themselves “transgender.”

In a stupid pamphlet about “inclusive language in the workplace,” the BMA explained that ordinary words in use since time began are now unacceptable because they might “exclude” some “transgender man”–in plain English, a woman with a highly addled psychology–who might become pregnant and then feel bad because “he” can’t be a mother…

Just stop it.

This business comes straight from Satan’s bag of tricks and smells of fire and brimstone. “Male and female created He them” (Genesis 1:27) really throws the PC crowd: God’s created order deeply offends them.

If physicians in the United Kingdom had any self-respect, they would ignore the BMA and make a point of going out of their way to use the forbidden language as often as possible, even if they had to phone BMA bigwigs in the middle of the night just to say “mother-mother-mother-mother-mother!”

Defy political correctness!

Donald Trump has proved it can be done.

Piffle Alert! The ‘Lunar Temple’

Image result for images of lunar dome of contemplation

It was for just such notions as this that such expressions as B.S., codswallop, crapola, and blather were invented.

The European Space Agency has revealed plans to build a “lunar temple” or “dome of contemplation”–barf bag, please–on the moon, as part of a lunar colony ( http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4162296/The-incredible-lunar-TEMPLE.html ).

Listen to this from the ESA grand poobah, who says the lunar colony will be “a fresh start, a place where there are no social conventions, no nations and no religion, somewhere where those concepts will need to be rethought from scratch.” Rethought by idiots. I marvel he didn’t ask us to imagine no possessions, while he was at it.

So… they’re gonna have a temple, but no religion. They’re even paying an in-house artist to design it. But a temple with no religion–how long do you suppose it’ll take for that vacuum to be filled by something rather nasty? I mean, do these turkeys ever think things through?

Yowsah, yowsah, folks! We’re gonna leave our Original Sin behind on earth, and live in outer space and be as gods!

Except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it.  Psalm 127:1.

Just In: ‘The March for Science’

Image result for global warming fraud

Well, hey, if a lot of angry foul-mouthed feminists can do it, Climate Change kooks can do it, too–a big fat march on Washington.

They’re organizing right now to “take a stand for science in politics” ( http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/01/26/first-women-now-scientists-march-washington/97079742/ ). So much for not politicizing science.

But of course what they’re really going to march for is Climate Change/Global Warming, which they like to call “facts with no alternatives,” and all the colossal Big Government action which that would entail. It’s just the same old Save The Planet crap–the biggest and best excuse lefties have ever come up with for their insatiable appetite for more and more power over regular people’s lives. Never mind it’s been repeatedly shown to be just fudged data and outright lies.

It cannot be denied that throughout earth’s history, local and regional climates change all the time. These are natural processes and no government, no matter how much power it grabs with both hands, can control them.

We can expect to see a lot of “marches” by a lot of left-wing losers over at least the next year or two.

Thankfully, we now have a president who has the courage and the common sense to ignore them. And we should, too.

What We’ve Won

Image result for images of liberating france

It was significant that the very first act of Donald Trump’s new presidential administration, literally within seconds of his swearing-in, was to delete from the White House website every single mention of Climate Change/Global Warming/Whatevuh.

What does this mean?

It may take some time to sink in, but it means a lot! It is the axe taken to the root of secular utopianism. It is the tanks rolling into town and chasing out the barbarians.

Global Warming, aka we’re-all-gonna-die-unless-we-give-the-government-absolute-power-and-all-our-money, very early on became a Leftist/Globalist political project worldwide. It was aimed at eventually imposing a world government, run by leftist schmucks, on the entire human race. Just look at who’s been pushing it, all along, and you’ll know everything you need to know about it.

But it is also part of something bigger. Saving The Planet From Climate Change is genetically akin to the transgender movement and other loony liberal causes: the whole idea of special individuals having the power–and the authority, backed up by the violence of the government–to define reality. Suddenly Schmendrick is not a man anymore, but a woman without a vagina. And if you don’t give lip service to his delusion, your friendly “human rights” commission will smash you.

God has given us an opportunity, a genuinely God-given opportunity, to crush and bury “progressivism” once and for all. They can’t carry out their vast global enterprises without the United States. And now, by God’s grace, there is suddenly a president in America whose example will encourage opposition everywhere.

Shame on us if we wimp out of finishing the work!

‘Robots as Persons’–Is This for Real?

Image result for i, robot by isaac asimov

The European Parliament has approved a draft proposal to grant “legal rights” to robots as “electronic persons” ( https://www.rt.com/viral/373450-robot-kill-switches-status/ ). It will also include “obligations” for robots to “make good any damage they may cause”–an obligation, by the way, which does not seem to apply to “asylum seekers” in Germany and France who have done a lot of damage which is not made good. But I digress.

Are they jiving us? I’m having a hard time believing this story. Take this quote, for instance:

“AI [Artificial Intelligence] developers will have to ensure their creations follow a set of rules that prohibit them from harming or allowing a human to come to harm through their inaction. AI can protect their own existence under the rules, if this does not harm any humans.” And just in case, it is proposed that a “kill switch” be added so that “any rogue robots can be turned off easily.”

Hold on a minute, there! Isn’t this “Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics”? In his 1942 short story, “Runaround,” science fiction great Isaac Asimov proposed “three laws,” which he applied to his stories about robots from then on and which were adopted by many other science fiction writers. I grew up reading those stories and novels, and I know those “laws” by heart.

One) A robot must not, by any action or inaction, cause or permit any human being to come to harm.

Two) A robot must obey all commands given to it by any human being, unless that would conflict with the First Law.

Three) A robot may do whatever it needs to do to protect its own existence, except when that would conflict with either the First or Second Law.

The robots in Asimov’s novels, like I, Robot, were almost indistinguishable from real human beings. The EU seems to be concerned that people may wind up confusing a robot’s simulation of human drives and emotions with the real thing. That could get kind of sticky.

And so the secular humanist God-playing project goes on and on, from one folly to the next. It is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, the sheep of his pasture–that’s what the Bible says (Psalm 100:3), and the secular whoopee crowd has a real problem with it.

As for me, I don’t see how people who don’t have all that much intelligence themselves can be so confident in their ability to create artificial intelligence in electronic persons.

Artificial Stupidity–yeah, I think they can manage that.

These people are very seriously deluded.

Top Scientist Resigns Over Climate Change Fraud

Image result for dr. judith curry

Physicist Judith Curry, chair of the Georgia Tech School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, has resigned her tenured position at the university, citing “the thoroughly politicized nature of climate science” as her reason ( http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/01/georgia-tech-climatologist-resigns-over-craziness-of-politics-in-climate-change/ ).

Dig this quote from the professor’s blog: “Research and other professional activities are professionally rewarded only if they are channeled in certain directions approved by a politicized academic establishment.” She also cited the rampant “craziness” that has infected her field of study.

Toldja! Yes, we told you so! The whole business has been corrupted by fraud and political bias. “Man-made Climate Change,” formerly known as Global Warming, is nothing but a big fat crock aimed at grabbing power and money at the public’s expense.

BTW, in searching for this story, I discovered that Professor Curry is not alone. She has a lot of company: a fair number of scientists have resigned to protest the deep corruption of “climate science.”

Told you so!