Oh, No! Illegals Flown to Martha’s Vineyard!

Elizabeth Warren Reacts to Supreme Court Roe v. Wade Leak

Senator Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren (D-Loonyland) is screaming bloody murder because Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has flown 50 illegal aliens to the posh Democrat casbah, Martha’s Vineyard (https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/warren-furious-desantis-new-low-shipping-migrants-marthas-vineyard).

Warren said it was “cruel”–cruel, mind you!–and “a new low” to transport illegals to a Democrat resort island. One is reminded of Monty Python’s Spanish Inquisition skit, in which a man is threatened with “the comfy chair.”

Hey, they’d better behave themselves on Martha’s Vineyard–or the next stop will be Club  Med.

Is it even necessary to point out that all these Democrats who call for sanctuary cities and sanctuary states screech like scalded cats the moment it’s their turn to provide the sanctuary? Yo, Pokey! You asked for sanctuary cities, and now you’ve got one. Enjoy it while you contemplate your double standard.

‘NY Governor: “I’m Undocumented”‘ (2018)

See the source image

He’s here illegally. He said so.

This is one of those preposterous lies Democrats like to tell, the kind that takes a real gift of ignorance to believe.

Do we understand by now that Andrew Cuomo needs to be put away–for his own good, and New York’s?

NY Governor: ‘I’m Undocumented’

Why would he even say a thing like this, unless there was something wrong with him?

But then Democrats never have to account for anything they say or do.

Down with Nation-States?

Image result for images of chaos in the streets

“We don’t need no stinkin’ nation-states!”

Nation-states “should not exist” and citizenship is “arbitrary,” “ridiculous,” and merely “a social construct,” self-proclaimed intellectuals from a not-quite-real “Freedom University” told an audience of–well, presumably students, at St. Olaf University recently (https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13704).

See? They don’t even pretend to make sense anymore. And you can always get an audience for that kind of thing at St. Olaf’s. The patron saint of Norway is very poorly served by the school that bears his name.

“Freedom University” serves “undocumented youth”–persons who are here illegally–and although it has a website, it occupies “an undisclosed location” somewhere in Atlanta.

So, okay, we get rid of nation-states–then what? What do we have in their place? My guess would be boiling chaos. They would certainly try to set up some kind of world government to keep the whole thing from blowing sky-high; and just as certainly it would fail.

But think of the fun they’d have, trying!

The far left is no longer sane, they’re all as crazy as bedbugs, and our colleges and looniversities cater to them like royalty. And they do it on our dime.

“Educating” ourselves to death…

Mischief in High Places

Image result for images of angry loretta lynch

I hate it when they invade my Sabbath rest; but every time I try to hang my hat on a nail of peace and sanity, some Democrat comes along and knocks it off. Because they don’t want peace and they don’t like sanity.

Today’s reprobate is our recent U.S. Attorney General, Loretta Lunch–er, Lynch–calling for I don’t know what, although I did listen to the video ( http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/ ). Ms. Lunch is most famous–er, infamous–for “exploring” whether the Justice Dept. ought to “investigate” persons for the newfangled pseudocrime of “Climate Change Denial,” and for meeting one-on-one with Billyboy Clinton while his wife, the presidential candidate, was being investigated by the FBI–and then, miraculously, the indictment went away. Go figure.

The WorldNetDaily headline is a little misleading. Lunch–er, Lynch–does not actually call for “more marching, blood, and death in the streets.” She does call this “a time of great fear and uncertainty,” probably one that will require some lives to be sacrificed before the smoke clears–she doesn’t say whose, and I didn’t hear her volunteering–and she’s all freaked out because of “rights being trampled… and even rolled back.” What “rights” is she talking about? Transgender bathroom rights? The right to come here illegally and get free stuff? In any event, to protect these rights, Ms. Lunch–er, Lynch–suggests that bloodshed and death are probably okay.

America has had eight years of lawlessness from the top down, and is by no imaginable measure a better country for it.

The Democrat Party has called Lynch’s video “words of inspiration.”

These people keep on showing us who they are; and God help us if we are ever so insane as to ever again let them hold power over us. That must never, never, never happen again.

‘Make America Mexico Again’?

 

Uh.. simple question: If Mexico is so good, why are all these Mexicans here instead of there? Like, dudes, you’ve already got a Mexico. Why do you need another? And if conditions there are so bad that you have to run to another country, what is the point of trying to make that other country just like Mexico?

But this is what happens when you let wicked Godless morons rule a country.

Why Executive Amnesty is Morally Wrong

http://www.worldhistory218.com/uploads/9/7/0/4/9704720/6757138.png

For the time being, a federal judge has put the kibosh on President *Batteries Not Included’s “executive amnesty” for millions of illegal aliens. But of course, once “progressives” have an evil work in hand, they never drop it. And the headlines are full of Republican surrender monkeys who seem to think the last election didn’t count.

Let us disregard, for the sake of argument, the probably irreparable harm that would be done by trying to digest, all at once, millions of unskilled poor people who come here from a foreign country and can’t speak English. Indeed, let’s go farther–even farther than Fat-head Jeb Bush, who thinks erasing our borders will somehow “lift our spirits.” Let’s say this wholesale amnesty will be altogether a blessing: guaranteed to get our economy moving again, re-invigorate a rotting culture, refresh our social institutions, and result in each and every one of us getting a highly-paid no-show job with a big fat pension that kicks in when we turn 35.

Executive amnesty would still be wrong.

Why? Because, as the president himself has remarked many times, during lucid intervals, the Constitution simply doesn’t give a president that kind of power. He cannot exercise such power without way overstepping his bounds. He can’t do it without violating the law and threatening the continued existence of our republican form of government.

Should the chief executive of a modern, civilized country also be its chief law-breaker?

And if Congress is willing to let a president function as a king, at the expense of its own Constitutional prerogatives and sphere of authority–well, then, what does that make them?

At the moment, it seems that all that stands between America and monarchy is a single federal judge.

That, and our prayers.