How badly do you want to see what cast that shadow?
Democrats are betting the house that most Americans–heck, practically all of us–strongly support “abortion rights” and will tolerate no restrictions on abortion, none at all.
Be prepared for their morally bankrupt arguments. We’ve heard them all before, and we’re going to hear them again, right on up to Election Day.
What is it about abortion that “progressives” love?
But that’s a rhetorical question. Sane people needn’t try to answer it.
(“Look at his eyes, Mommy! He is crazy!”)
Look at the people who’d been moved into government, these past three years. It’s enough to make to sit down and cry.
So here’s “national security spokesman” John Kirby hailing abortion as “necessary for military readiness” and “a foundational sacred obligation of military leaders” (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/biden-spokesman-john-kirby-insists-abortion-is-necessary/).
He prefers to call it “reproductive care”–although abortion is surely a last-ditch effort to prevent reproduction.
(“We can’t attack them, comrade! Not with all those abortions they do. We wouldn’t stand a chance!”)
It’s distressing to observe that our nation is governed–shall we say “ruled”?–by Far Left wack-jobs like this one. And we’ve got a treasury secretary who thinks the Ukraine war is a boon to the economy. And this fat guy with a wig and nail polish who says he is a woman–he’s in charge of public health.
Someday historians will argue about whether this age actually existed.
Is this the face that launched a thousand slips?
All liberals are geniuses, right? I mean, that’s what we’ve always been told.
Chelsea Clinton is a liberal; therefor Chelsea Clinton is a genius.
Now, if you posit that liberals are not geniuses, but dolts, then the above-cited nooze story will make sense to you.
“Oh! If only my maternal grandmother had had access to Planned Parenthood!”
Stooooooo-pid!
“Incoherent?” Me???
Pope Francis I, who has come up with more than a few prize whoppers in his time, says he can’t make head nor tail of SloJo Biden’s position on abortion–which he has called “incoherent” and incomprehensible (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/pope-derides-biden-s-abortion-views-catholic-self-identity-as-incoherence/ar-AAZxZ7j).
I wouldn’t have thought it possible that you could take a moral position which this pope would find objectionable. But Joe’s been in politics a long time. If he couldn’t do it, nobody can.
SloJo, who calls himself “a devout Catholic” (where do they learn to lie like that?), is on record supporting abortion under all circumstances, no restrictions whatsoever.
Catholic teaching calls abortion a moral sin. If any pope is going to deviate from that, he might as well find another job. Not even Francis, “the Red Pope,” friend to communism, world government, neo-paganism, Amazon fertility goddesses–not even he can follow SloJo that far out onto the abortion limb. It might break off.
We are seeing a plan for human extinction, engineered by fools who don’t know they’re under Satan’s direction, play itself out before our very eyes. A) Abort every baby they can. B) Provide sterility-causing “gender reassignment” to those who get past the abortionist: at the very least, sell them on LGBTQetc.–no babies that way. C) Shoot ’em up with experimental “vaccines” that might hasten them on to the morgue. D) Always offer assisted suicide as an option, worthy of the highest praise and emulation.
This is their plan for ridding the world of humanity.
Just a little too far-out even for this pope.
Pastor Greg Locke
Damn! I couldn’t get the video to work. Oh, there’s plenty of video on YouTube, but all of it sharply slanted against Pastor Greg Locke of Mount Juliet’s Global Vision Bible Church, in Tennessee. But if you click the link below, “Isreal365news.com” will provide you with some highlights of his sermon.
This man is not messing around. “You cannot be a Democrat and a Christian!” he says–a “baby-butchering election thief”–and if you remain a Democrat, he wants you out of his church.
Idiots called for some kind of “investigation” of the pastor, but he beat them to the punch by publicly renouncing his church’s 501(c)3 tax-exempt status. By the way, if you know of even one time that the “Freedom From Religion Foundation” or the ACLU ever went after a pastor who sided with Democrats, please let us all know about it.
Yes, the “nooze” outlets are all lined up against this guy. “Oh, how simply dreadful! A preacher denouncing a political party from his pulpit! Quick, the smelling salts! Oh, the extremism! Really, I think I’m going to be ill!” What a bunch of claggers. But then anytime you see the noozies being unanimous, you can be pretty sure it’s a Democrat talking point fed to them by their masters.
Pastor Locke, you go, brother! You have said things that needed to be said.
That’s how you’ve freaked them out.
No, it’s not a 1950s horror movie. It’s 2022 abortion politics.
When someone not yet identified leaked an impending Supreme Court ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade, the ruling that “legalized” abortion without any legislation, Democrats and the rest of the Far Left scream machine went off like dynamite.
And among the first casualties–or so it seemed, just days ago–was the fantastic figure of The Pregnant Man, aka “birthing person” (https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/05/12/democrats-have-jumped-back-on-the-men-can-get-pregnant-fantasy-train-n1597284). Suddenly abortion was all about “women’s health”–not “birthing person’s”–and “a woman’s right to choose.” Women this, women that, and not a pregnant man anywhere in sight.
Then Senate Democrats rushed to “codify” abortion by making a law to support it. They already had a bill guaranteeing nationwide “abortion rights,” but it failed last year because it was too full of Crazy. So they modified it, trying to make it sound like something not written by untreated mental patients, and a few days ago, put it up for a vote as the Women’s Health Protection Act”–
–Which, once you got past the title, made not one mention of women–unless you want to count the one about all restrictions on abortion “are rooted in misogyny.” Otherwise, pregnant women were replace by “all people with the capacity for pregnancy.”
Yup, he’s back. The Pregnant Man returns.
I think the Dems should dump the donkey and adopt the Pregnant Man as their party’s mascot.
So-called “fact checkers,” Democrat politicians, and sock-puppet “news reporters” are hopping mad over Internet posts that claim that California’s new abortion bill will allow infanticide: babies may be killed seven days, 28 days, six months or whatever… after being born (https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/government-verify/california-bill-doesnt-allow-killing-babies-7-days-after-birth/536-bd069cb5-0db6-4d73-a05d-0254b5ad23aa).
Okay, it doesn’t say that.
What it does say is that if a baby dies shortly after being born, coroners will not be required to investigate those deaths. They claim this is to protect women [what happened to “pregnant people”?] from having hardship piled on tragedy: after all, babies can die of natural causes.
But it also might be read to say, “If your baby dies shortly after birth, we’re gonna look the other way.”
At the very least, they need to rewrite this bill with more care taken as to language. But do we really expect Democrats to restrict abortion in any way, for any reason? Have they not shown us, abundantly, that they love abortion? It’s kind of a sacrament for them.
Remember when there was only one of him?
Sen. Upchuck Schumer (D-Bedlam) wants to have another vote on the “Women’s Health Protection Act”–euphemism for “Abortion ’em all!”–which failed in the Senate some two months ago (https://dailycaller.com/2022/05/05/democrats-white-supremacy-gender-oppression-abortion-womens-health-protection-act/).
Get a load of all the schiff they had to take out of the bill before they could make it ready for another vote:
White supremacy, transgenderism, gender oppression, “pregnant people” including men, “enslavement” (do they mean “slavery”? So hard to tell with these people)… and rape, of course: restricting abortion will cause more rapes…
Were they surprised when this bill failed?
I ask again: are these people as crazy as they sound?
A few days ago I posted a YouTube video of a priest, Fr. James Altman in LaCrosse, Wisconsin, standing up for the truth: declaring, in no uncertain terms, that you can’t be Catholic and be pro-abortion (https://leeduigon.com/2021/04/30/another-priest-stands-up-for-truth/).
Last night Dawn Renee wanted to see that video, only to find it had been taken down. Earlier this morning, Phoebe tried to comment on it, only to see her comment disappear instead of being posted. I found the comment in the spam folder, where it should not have been, and moved it to the post where it belongs.
I went back to YouTube and was surprised to find Father Altman’s videos still there. I will now pause in writing this to look again.
[Ten minutes later] Well, I can’t find that particular video on YouTube just now. But there are still some other Father Altman videos present in which he makes the point, “You cannot be Catholic and a Democrat. Period.” Like this one.
Let’s see how long this video stays here before someone removes it. Who? I don’t know. If somebody out there knows, please tell me. Why? I think because Big Tech is imposing a rigid censorship regime. How? I have no idea.
They think that by silencing us in the social media, they’ll stop us. Like, if we can’t say it, we won’t be able to think it. But we do say it, sunshine, and we do think it; and you are not fooling us. We see what you’re up to and we don’t like it!
O Lord our God! Give us the tools and weapons that we need to fight the ungodly and turn them back from their attempted conquest of the earth. Give us greater courage than theirs, greater endurance, greater strength, and greater intelligence than theirs. Confound them and defeat them: fight for us, O God. In Jesus’ name, Amen.
Her husband, the worst president ever, once said abortion is how girls and young women “fulfill their dreams.”
Now, in a recently-released Netflix toady-flic, Michelle Obama has blamed her children for–well, it sounds like ruining her life. “The thing that really changed it [her life] was the birth of our children,” the former Worst Lady said. “Something had to give and it was my aspirations and dreams” (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/michelle-obama-says-she-gave-up-her-aspirations-and-dreams-to-have-children).
Who in his right mind is going to sit there and watch a thing like that? (Not many, I’ve heard: but the Internet is curiously devoid of any reports on the movie’s reception.) And why didn’t they just get the kids aborted, and thus fulfill her dreams?
Wouldn’t you say she had a pretty good run, though? No-show job worth several hundred thou. Wife of the president. Spent boxcar-loads of public money on herself: at least $85 million on personal travel and vacations alone (https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article123335079.html). Looks to me like she’s had a damned fine time at our expense.
I do feel sorry for the daughters for having had to hear this from their, er, mother.