Tag Archives: liberals vs. free speech

Stop This Wickedness

See the source image

Bad enough I have to write about this stuff; I’m not going to illustrate it, too! Here, instead, is a nice picture of a red eft.

I’ve held off on writing about the so-called “Equality Act,” which House Democrats passed on Friday while normal people were coming home from work, because I was (and still am, mostly) convinced it was a stunt. The Democrats were using it to stir up their Far Left Crazy base, while conservatives took advantage of it to scare people into donating more money to their cause.

I expect this abomination to die in the Senate. And if not, President Trump has already said he wouldn’t sign it.

This mischief, disguised as a “law,” would be more aptly titled “the Homosexual Supremacy Act.” It would cripple all opposition, even religious opposition grounded in the First Amendment, to the assorted lifestyle innovations so enthusiastically promoted by Democrats. There’s no way we could have both this and freedom of religion, freedom of speech. One or the other would have to go. Guess which one the Democrat Party would like to see erased.

So let’s see what happens in the Senate.

If they fail to stop it there–well, GOP senators, you’re going to be wiped out in the primaries.

Either Christian America wins, or Christian America dies. It’s that simple.

So let’s make sure we win this fight.


Why We Can’t Let Google and Facebook Quash Free Speech

See the source image

Well, I did the Newswithviews column, and I’m tired–but first, here’s a little something you should read, if you’re concerned about social media giants stifling conservatives.

In a piece written for Front Page Magazine, Daniel Greenfield offers a counter to the “But it’s a private company” argument that would let Google and Facebook continue to censor conservative opinion off the political landscape (https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273740/why-freedom-speech-should-apply-google-facebook-daniel-greenfield). But first a quote from his conclusion:

“A country in which freedom of speech effectively did not exist, even though it remained a technical right, would not be America. A government that allowed such a thing would have no right to exist.”

Sooner or later someone is going to remember that the Internet itself, and the social media, too, would not have come into existence without major developmental efforts funded by the American taxpayer–by you and me. Google and Facebook have taken their share of public money while claiming all the rights and privileges of private ownership. But in fact they are already, and have been all along, quasi-public agencies: and, as such, obligated to respect the First Amendment.

They mustn’t be allowed to restrict speech only to liberals, Democrats, and Far Left Crazy (you will overlook the tautology).

What the Left wants has no place in America.


The Gospel and Free Speech on College Campuses

Evangelizing on the campus can be mighty difficult, these days… But our friend SlimJim was up to the challenge.    –LD

The Domain for Truth

For those who are not strangers of this blog you will know I do a lot of my evangelism offline and on college campuses.  I don’t think I talk about my evangelism much but I do from time to time on here.  In the post I have written “What are some ways you share the gospel locally using Apologetics? College Campuses Evangelism” and gave my account of an “Intellectually Bipolar Secular Humanist College Student on Sexuality.”

This morning I read Lee’s post on his blog titled “Wonderful News! 28 States Act to Restore Free Speech on Campus.”  This was wonderful news for me to hear.

Most of the time my evangelism does not face any problems with authorities.  But that doesn’t mean it never happen so the more clarity and laws there are protecting campus freedom of speech the better.

View original post 743 more words


‘University: “No Such Thing as Free Speech”‘ (2015)

See the source image

From the Rutgers Looniversity student handbook, 2015: “There is no such thing as free speech.”

https://leeduigon.com/2015/08/26/university-no-such-thing-as-free-speech/

That’s gonna look pretty bad when President Trump’s executive order, cutting off research grants to all colleges and looniversities that refuse to allow free speech, goes into effect.

Then my old alma mater–where, once upon a time, “dissent” was a sacred cow–will be on the phone to me again, asking me for money.

I can hardly wait.


Here Comes the Internet Censor!

See the source image

But in Britain they don’t have a First Amendment…

Well, the UK is preparing to anoint an “internet czar” to rein in the social media, promote “internet safety,” whatever that is, and prevent “online harms,” whatever they are (https://www.cnet.com/news/uk-to-keep-social-networks-in-check-with-internet-safety-regulator/).

Yessir, they’re gonna set up a “regulator” who will have the power to shut down any sites on the internet where they find any of the following: 1) inciting violence and spreading violent content; 2) encouraging self-harm or suicide (Are you listening, Netflix?); 3) spread of “disinformation and fake news,” whatever that may be; 4)cyber-bullying; 5) children accessing “inappropriate material” (eye-of-the-beholder alert); and 6) child exploitation and abuse content.

To some, “violence” is defined as any failure to agree with their Far Left delusions. To governments, and especially to Democrats, “fake news” is anything they don’t want you to know about, or anything that makes them look bad: but if it’s aimed at Donald Trump, no problem. As for “inappropriate material,” grade school libraries are full of fornication-celebrating “young readers” books.

Do you trust politicians to decide what you can or can’t say on the Internet?

I’d love to hear Brett Kavanaugh’s take on some of this.

 


Dems Seek Still More Control over Nooze Media

See the source image

So Fox News, in 2016, did not run a story about then-presidential candidate Donald Trump’s so-called affair with porn actress “Stormy” Daniels–and now House Democrats are looking to punish Fox for that decision (https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/04/02/house-democrats-want-oversight-over-fox-news-editorial-decisions/).

This is our “free and independent press” that the Dems absolutely love when it’s carrying their water–which most nooze outlets do, most of the time. And now Dems are saying that the “free and independent press” should be punished for freely and independently choosing not to cover a certain story in time to bend an election toward the Democrats.

Are these people totally disgusting, or what?

So the House Committee on Crushing Freedom or whatever they call it has demanded “documents” held by the Fox reporter who researched Trump & Daniels. Meanwhile her editor has told them to take a long walk off a short pier.

They want the “documents” because they’re trying to show that Fox’s decision not to run with the story constituted an in-kind campaign contribution and therefor violated campaign finance law.

They could just as easily say a favorable story about a candidate was also an in-kind contribution and a violation of the law. They can get you for running with the story, or they can get you for not running with it. Either way, they’ve got you.

So what we have here is a barefaced attempt to exercise total control over what news gets reported in America and what news doesn’t–even at a time when almost all the “mainstream” nooze media have voluntarily sold themselves into slavery to the Democrat Party: and sold themselves cheap, at that.

If you voted for them, you really ought to be ashamed of yourself.


‘Dem Platform Committee: “Prosecute Climate Change Deniers” (2016)

See the source image

Tthey’ve got a brand-new Inquisition waiting for us

Not many people seemed to notice it at the time, but in 2016 the Democrat platform committee voted unanimously to authorize the attorney general to “investigate” the “crime” of Climbit Change Denial–that is, to criminalize the expression of a particular opinion on a controversial public issue.

https://leeduigon.com/2016/06/29/dem-platform-committee-prosecute-climate-change-deniers/

It also seems that very few people remember that this was done. After all, Hillary lost, so they didn’t get a chance to put their scheme into action.

Please, remember this next year, when once again it’s time to vote. Please do not ever allow Democrats back into power. They do grow crazier with every passing year, and it’s not safe to entrust them with authority.

Because if they do get back in, this is the kind of mischief they have prepared for us.


UK Cops: For Shame!

See the source image

Guarding Britain against misgendering!

“I want to be a police officer when I grow up, so I can lock people up for misgendering…”

British police are “investigating” a Catholic journalist for the ridiculous pseudo-crime of “misgendering” a 25-year-old man who says he’s now a woman (https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/03/19/police-question-uk-journalist-for-misgendering-a-transgender-woman/). They’ll arrest her, they say, unless she shows up at the cop shop for “a taped interview.”

Meanwhile, now that the news has come out, her whole family has been threatened and harassed by jidrools who’ve drunk the “transgender” Kool-Aid.

In its campaign to wipe out free speech, and truth, the UK now has a “Malicious Communications Act” which forbids you to say anything but nice things about anyone but Christians. You can get two years in prison for referring to a man as a man if he’s saying he’s a woman.

And I’m my own grandpa.

Hey, how come we never see cases like this on British cop shows? Busting those enemies of the people who call a man a man. Why are they so focused on solving murders?

Uh, because if you made a case like this the subject of a drama, the audience would mistake it for a comedy?

But it isn’t so funny for this Catholic journalist who’s now being harassed, vilified, and persecuted because she wouldn’t play along with the transgender delusion. This woman is being treated as a criminal because she wouldn’t say something that isn’t true.

Shame on Britain. Shame on the British cops for slavishly enforcing this absurd “law” that is an affront to sanity.

And if we don’t watch out, Democrats will be passing such laws for us. They can’t wait to do the same.


This It meens War!!!

See the source image

Well that Donold Trumpt he has did it “now”! He “is” goingto taik Awaeighy our Freedumb by fourcing “all The” collidges to has Free Speach and iff thay dont then thay dont get no Rheserch Grandts fromb the Fedral Guvvermint!!!

This hear is watt hapens “wen” yiu get a wyte spremassist knotsy for Pressadint! He is so Ingnorint,,, i bett he “nevver” wented to Collidge in his hole stopid lyfe!!!! He is like a,ll themb other ordrinary dum peeple thay dont “know” “that” Free Speach IT IS UNCONSATUCHINAL!!!

We jist lernt that in Nothing Studdies and i gess yiu dont “know” that unlest yiu has goed to Collidge!! Free Speach it is jist “anether” Naime for Hat Speach!!!! and neckst thing yiu know yiu has got biggits saying stufff!! Our collidge we has tryed to bee Nice abote it and so we has aloud “”Free Speach Zoans” like beheined the boyler Room “and” aslo in one of the Brooom Clozzits wen tha Janniter he is nott Using “it”!!! But doo yiu “thinck” the Haters thay was Contentt whith that??? NO!!!!! thay wants to “has” Free Speach evryware!!! that is wat hapens wen yiu trye “to be” nice to thoze peple!!!

Our Stodent Soviet we “are” not goingto “sit still” fore This!! so we has votid to Take Aweay themb twoo “Free Speach Zoans” that we had and has none of themb Instedd!! Lyke it sayes in our Stodent Hand Boock thare is reely “no sutch Thing” as Free Speach so yiu beter whatch wat yiu says!!! lets see how Thay lyke it now!!

And if we reely neeed themb Rheserch Grandts wel than “we” wil jist “Prindt Up” our Own munny and Use that!!! and donold Trump he “can” jist go Powned Sallt!!!!!


Student Can’t Be in National Honor Society… Because He Supports the President

See the source image

Will school officials wind up getting stung for their actions?

A junior at Holmdel High School in New Jersey  was invited to the White House to hear President Donald Trump’s speech yesterday about restoring free speech in, ahem, “higher education,” where it is mostly banned, these days.

The president invited Boris Kizenko, 16, after learning that the junior was barred from the National Honor Society for a “character flaw”–his support of the president on the social media (https://patch.com/new-jersey/holmdel-hazlet/holmdel-student-who-feuded-high-school-invited-meet-trump).

School officials–why do those words always set off the doofus alarm?–say pshaw, it never happened, we would like never keep a kid out of the National Honor Society just to punish him for his politics! We are at liberty to disbelieve them.

Boris says he’s tired of having to listen to the “regurgitated left-wing ideology” that’s offered every day at public schools.

The president, meanwhile, plans to stop all federal research grants to all colleges and universities where free speech only exists for left-wingers.

We’ll keep our eyes peeled for an update on Boris Kizenko’s story. Will the school officials suddenly change their minds and let him into the National Honor Society?

Personal note: Holmdel was one of the towns I covered for The Bayshore Independent in the 1970s. I liked their high school football team, but the township’s politics were relatively quiet.


%d bloggers like this: