They’re At It Again: New ‘Disinformation’ Task Force

Babbling moron' Kamala Harris shouldn't be a 'heartbeat away' from the  presidency | The Weekly Times

She thinks it’s funny. Do we?

Democrats will never give up their dream of stifling free speech. So first they tried a “disinformation board,” but that blew up in their faces, once the public found out about it.

Last week they announced Dis-Info 2.0–a “task force” (oh, good grief!) headed by the virtually brainless Kamala Harris and also including administration goons Alejandro Mayorkas (Homeland Security), integrity-challenged Attorney General Merrick Garland, and bumbling Secretary of State Antony Blinken (where’s Winken and Nod?).

The purpose of the task force is to “protect” “political figures” and journalists from Internet harassment and abuse. (But they’re the ones who need harassment and abuse!) And Cherished Minorities, of course: they need government protection. ‘Cause they get “terrorized” by the rest of us. See who gets punished for abusing, harassing, or terrorizing Christians or conservatives. Don’t hold your breath.

Is there anyone in this administration you respect? Is there anyone in it who is not a crook or an idiot or both?

The Last Free Country Left on Earth

The 'Spirit of '76' in PSJ

Is the United States of America the last free country left on earth? Sometime it seems so.

Have you ever wondered why we have a First Amendment, and other countries don’t? This important piece of our law, the Constitution, guarantees us (in order) freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to assemble and petition the government for relief of our grievances. No other country has these guarantees.

Which doesn’t stop Democrats and other elements of Far Left Crazy from trying to take them away from us and either erase them altogether or else reserve these liberties to themselves alone. Hence a “Disinformation Governance Bureau,” “hate speech” rules, and all the rest. (Hint: It’s “fundamental transformation”!)

There are countries in the, ahem, “Free World” where I’d be silenced for the things I write. Tell me I’d be safe in Canada, the UK, or Australia. All of these countries had more freedom not that many years ago.

Our country’s founders had to have freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. They hazarded their lives to win these freedoms, and so they could pass them on to their descendants. The leftids would replace these our natural rights with BS made-up pseudo-rights (unlimited abortion, LGBTQetc, transgender, illegal immigration, and on and on and on)–and above all, a supposed “right” to fornication.

There’s global government sniffing around, in search of vulnerabilities. Global government whose grand panjandrums think of most of us as “useless” or “worthless” people, fit only to be kept quiescent with drugs and video games.

We need our Spirit of ’76! Yes, we still need it after all these years; and always will.

How Democrats ‘Support’ Free Speech

The Limits of Free Speech | PolicyEd

Authoritarian Far Left statists though they are, Democrats are still reluctant to admit that they would like to scrap the Bill of Rights–especially the right to free speech. We all know that they believe that free speech should only be for speech that they want to hear. Everything else would be “hate speech” or “disinformation,” for which you should be severely punished.

Even so, the latest Democrat mantra is “We support free speech…” And then there’s a “but” or an “as long as” which negates their support of any freedom.

Here are a few of the most popular caveats and add-ons. Each sentence starts with “We support free speech,” or even “Of course we support free speech!”

*”As long as it doesn’t cross the line.” (What line? It usually turns out that only the Dems know where that line is.)

*”As long as it’s used responsibly, with respect for all.” (Are they kidding? The day they show respect for anyone, they’ll be six feet underground.)

*”But it must never be used for disinformation.” Unless Democrats speak to deceive us; then it’s okay.

*”But misinformation does real harm, and must be curtailed!” Again, unless they’re the ones spouting the misinformation. Then it’s okay. But for everyone else, the penalties for simply being wrong must be really harsh.

*”As long as it doesn’t trample on anyone else’s free speech.” (You have to shut up because some trans performance artist had a tantrum when he real your blog post.)

You can see where this is heading. They’d love to be able to jail you for Climate Change Denial, mis-gendering, or laughing at John Kerry. But until they’re able to do that, they’ll have to be content with herding you toward the open jailhouse door.

Now They Want to Put Their Words into Your Mouth

Force-feeding Images, Stock Photos & Vectors | Shutterstock

Just another form of force-feeding!

You knew they’d never be content with just censoring and silencing everyone who isn’t them. True, they’ll never be content with anything: that’s what it means to be a “progressive”: you’re always sitting on a nail.

And so… having created a “Bureau of Misinformation,” which is called The Ministry of Truth in George Orwell’s 1984, the damned thing’s hardly up and running yet and they already want to expand its powers.

https://thekingofstocks.com/2022/05/10/insane-clown-and-disinformation-czar-nina-jankowicz-wants-trustworthy-people-like-herself-to-be-able-to-add-context-to-other-peoples-tweets/

Lefty loon Nina Janowicz, tapped to direct the agency, now says she wants “trusty, verifiable people” (whatever the dickens that means) to “add context” to other people’s posts and tweets. ‘Cause Ex-President *Batteries Not Included sez just plain censorship “doesn’t go far enough.”

So let’s say you Tweet, “Joe Biden is a paragon of senility.” One of Janowicz’s playmates sees that and changes it to read, “Joe Biden is a paragon.” Or he could add some context: like, “The person who tweeted this is a Hater and a Neo Nazi!” Actually, it seems they can do anything that pops into their heads.

How do you get truth out of people who say there is no truth, there’s only “constructs”–and their “constructs” somehow get treated as absolute truth?

Work and pray for a total wipe-out of the Democrat Party this November.

 

Can They Force You to Say Things That Violate Your Conscience?

to put words in(to) someone's mouth

Colorado’s at it again, wiping out civil liberties because those are not as important as… “gay marriage.” This time the target is a web designer who says she can’t design wedding pages for same-sex faux “marriages”–even though she hasn’t yet actually designed any wedding pages (https://www.dailywire.com/news/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-colorado-case-over-lgbt-discrimination-and-freedom-of-speech).

This is Colorado’s “Anti-Discrimination Act,” last heard from when these tinpot tyrants spent years trying to force a Christian baker to design cakes for same-sex parodies of weddings. What they want is the power to put words in your mouth: compelled speech. This is a pre-emptive strike against a citizen and her religious liberties.

If they can get away with that, then there is no First Amendment anymore. And where will they stop–with lions in the arena?

So this case is going to the U.S. Supreme Court, and we’ll see if the judges are at all serious about protecting our liberties.

P.S.–Well, that report left a bad taste in my mouth! I think when I get back from the store I’ll try try an Oy, Rodney episode. And then try to work on my book.

‘Faux-Cahontas’ Sued for Trying to Get Book Suppressed

Indian Teepee Images, Stock Photos & Vectors | Shutterstock

When she’s not carousing in the Senate…

When a U.S. Senator writes to the head honcho of a major book distributor to get them to stop promoting a book, censorship is standing on the doorstep.

Sen Elizabeth Warren charged that the book, The Truth About Covid-19, is chock-full of “misinformation.” Sen. Warren is famous for having long claimed to be a Native American–a claim that was dramatically refuted by DNA evidence when she ran for president last year.

The suit against her has been filed by the publisher, Chelsea Green Publishing, the co-authors, Dr. Joseph Mercola and Robin Cummins, and the author of the forward, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The plaintiffs say Warren–who falsely claimed to be a Native American–is trying to deprive them of their First Amendment rights.

What legal theory is she trying to push on us? [Note: Warren has falsely claimed to be a Native American–and cashed in on it.] Supposedly this book has to be suppressed because it contains “misinformation.” What does that mean? Has it got its facts wrong? Did the authors include a lot of B.S. that they made up? Are some things confused with others?

Because if “misinformation” means what most of us think it means, then no one’s safe from censorship–and possible criminal penalties!–because anyone can be… wrong. Crikey, CNN and MSNBC wouldn’t last ten minutes without misinformation. And what would happen to political campaigns? And advertising?

Or does “misinformation” merely denote something that deviates from the party line as laid out by prominent Democrats, at least one of whom pretends to be an Indian?

When a U.S. Senator suggests that maybe you’d better stop promoting a book, if you know what’s good for you–well, it would take someone bolder than the CEO at Amazon Books to tell her to go pack up her teepee.

Amazon promised to stop promoting the book, and stopped offering the e-book for sale.

Mandate! Dems Must Be Shown To Be ‘The Happy Party’

Democratic Reps. Nancy Pelosi, Calif., James Clyburn, N.C., and Charles  Rangel, N.Y., left to right, laugh hysterically after Rangel joked about  the possible price of Depends during a news conference to warn

Yukkin’ it up from now on!

A brand-new mandate signed by “President” Jobydin and endorsed by Squeaker of the House Nancy Pelosi will forbid writers and other artists “from showing any bad or sad things happening to Democrats,” according to a presidential adviser whose name may not be mentioned.

“From now on,” he cackled, “the Democratic Party will be The Happy Party! The American people will learn to associate it with feelings of joy, bliss, and euphoria. No more negativity allowed! No more criticism! And anyhow it’s a mandate, not a law–so don’t even think about getting it debated, let alone repealed.”

Supreme Court Chief Justice Bartholomew Roberts said the high court will not hear any cases involving The Happy Party mandate. “I mean, they will kill us if we piss them off,” he explained.

The mandate will apply to political advertising, said White House counsel John Silver. “Republicans will not be allowed to say anything bad about the Democratic candidates,” Silver said. “Hee, hee! That’ll tie their hands!”

Up Next: A mandate banning improper thoughts

Good News: Court Nixes California Pronoun Law

Spanish judge orders 25-yr old man to 'leave home and get a job'

Holy moly! The Transgender Machine actually lost a court case! And in California, no less.

The 3rd District Appeals Court struck down a provision of a 2017 state law that would have required nursing home employees to use “preferred pronouns” (https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/jul/21/california-court-strikes-down-transgender-pronoun-/). I don’t know how many 90-year-old trannies are to be found in California’s nursing homes, all clamoring to be called something they’re not; but this time they lost a unanimous court decision.

The court ruled, 3-0, that forcing anyone to use a “preferred pronoun”–calling a man “she” or a woman “he”–forcing people to say things that they believe to be untrue–is a “content-based restriction on speech” and violates the First Amendment.

Violates it? More like lacerates it. Imagine living in a state where they can make you say things that you not only don’t believe, but which thoroughly affront your sense of truth.

The Far Left state senator who drafted the law whined about “deliberately misgendering a transgender person” is nothing less than “harassment,” blah-blah. Like forcing people to say things they know to be wicked and wrong… isn’t?

And like there’s really any such thing as “misgendering.”

‘California Free Speech-Killing Bill: On Hold for Now’ (2018)

See the source image

“And suddenly it hit me! If you can go to jail just for being wrong, I’d be the only one left outside…”

Remember this? California was going to make “fake news” against the law! Yup, a felony, punishable by prison time. No more “misinformation” allowed! It would have also been against the law to be wrong. Good thing that never happens to 100% Democrat lamestream nooze!

California Free Speech Killing Bill: On Hold for Now

Of course, they, the government, would decide what was true and what was “misinformation.” They were especially interested in stamping out “vaccine skepticism”–two years before anybody heard of COVID.

But then a funny thing happened. Gov. Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown vetoed the legislation, saying it was “not necessary.” Musta been too Far Left even more him. Who would’ve ever believed that was possible?

‘The University: Where Young Minds Go to Die’ (2015)

See the source image

Do I hear a micro-aggression?

When I was in freshman orientation for college in 1971, the theme was “dissent”–for its own sake, as an end in itself, as the highest social good, as a moral imperative, blah-blah (I’ll have to write more about this later).

Now there’s no dissent allowed.

The University: Where Young Minds Go to Die

I should point out that by “dissent” they meant agreeing with left-wing professors.

Someday posterity (if there is any posterity will remember us as the society that “educated” itself to death.