I like to think of how much it hurt to publish that.
Move over, Nostradamus! Dig this line I wrote and published on June 4, 2016:
This is why Donald Trump is going to be our next president.
And how many highly-paid pundits were writing that, back then?
(I must be feeling better. Well, I am! Thanks, everybody, for your prayers.)
Here’s the post in which I wrote that deathless line.
“The Worst Lady” was about the Obamas and Hillary Clinton and other Democrat schmendricks wining about what tough lives they have. Donald Trump, also fabulously wealthy, at least spent his own money, not ours.
Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear, when the president’s freakin’ wife, whom no one voted for, who is accountable to no one, got to decide what millions and millions of kids in public schools could have or not have for lunch.
Want those days to come again?
Next election, just refrain from voting Republican.
By and by, they won’t be satisfied with controlling what your kids can eat. They’ll tell you what to eat!
Remember those glory days when the Worst Lady–no one voted for her, nor had she an iota of lawful authority to do any of this–meddled with your kids’ school lunches? ‘Cause she knew best, you peasants!
Only sometimes those government school lunches didn’t turn out so good, did they?
Well, if you’re going to let the government feed your children’s minds, you might as well let them feed their bodies, too.
Some of the things liberals say–when you hear them, you don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
In an interview on PBS with Charlie Rose, Hillary Clinton said, “Hopefully Trump hasn’t ordered the killing of people and journalists” (http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/26/hillary-clinton-trump-i-hope-he-hasnt-killed-journalists-and-racist). I thought journalists were people, too; but she said it, not me.
Let’s see… who is most often rumored to have left a long trail of dead bodies in his/her wake–Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump? Far be it from me to say the stories are true. But they’re out there, and most of us have heard them. You’d think it was a subject she wouldn’t want to bring up.
Michelle Obama comes a close second for having said, “Any woman who voted against Hillary Clinton voted against their own voice.” The comment gives us a peek into the jumbled contents of a poorly-lit mind. Achtung! All women must vote for Hillary! Because she too is a woman! More or less.
I believe Democrats say things like this because they have cut themselves off from the living God as the source of all truth, and have listened to too many collidge prefessers and other interllecturals declaring that there’s no such thing as truth and the only thing that counts is getting your way, politically. It puts them into a position in which they get to thinking they can be gods themselves, if they play their cards right.
It is to our nation’s shame that we have ever let such persons as these obtain power and influence over us. We really ought to try very hard not to let that happen anymore.
Michelle Obama–who lives in luxury that you and I will never see, let alone experience–recently told graduating seniors at City College of New York, “I wake up each day in a house built by slaves.” ( http://www.gopusa.com/michelle-obama-i-wake-up-each-day-in-house-built-by-slaves/ )
This is why Donald Trump is going to be our next president. Who is not tired of this kind of hypocritical bellyaching? Both Trump and the Obamas–and Hillary Clinton, too, come to think of it–are rich beyond anything we can imagine. Hey, remember when Mr. President spent a million dollars of our money to take Michelle to New York City on a “date”? But the difference between Trump and any rich Democrat is that the Dems are always trying to pretend they’re poor. Remember when Hillary told us she was broke? Oh, let’s pass the hat around!
Also, Trump spends his own money, but they spend ours.
In fairness, the Worst Lady, in her speech, was trying to make the point that some version of “the American Dream”–whatever that may be–is still around, and that makes America a pretty swell country. Only what she thinks makes America swell is not the same as what you think makes America swell. I think she has America confused with the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and her party with the Hapsburg dynasty. It’s all about “diversity”–as an end in itself–not unity. Cram as many different groups into the country as you can, with all of them going off in all different directions and only Democrat pandering to hold the whole blamed thing together. It also gives the Party the opportunity to keep on playing off this group against that group, but Michelle didn’t mention that.
Actually, she doesn’t spend all that much time in the White House. With all the tabs paid by the U.S. taxpayer, she vacations at Martha’s Vineyard and Hawaii, and jets all over the world accompanied by her wardrobe–she spends more of our money on a pair of sneakers than we spend on a week’s groceries for the whole family–and her hair dresser and her dog walker and her manicurist and the rest of her entourage.
What in the world does she have to complain about?
Let’s see, now… What item of inane and frustrating news can I find that’ll crank up my blood pressure today?
Oh, I’ve got it! The federal government has threatened to fine schools that don’t comply with Michelle Obama’s diktat on what foods the children in the cafeteria can and can’t eat ( http://freebeacon.com/issues/feds-schools-michelle-obamas-lunch-rules/ ).
The Food and Nutrition Service, an agency of our beloved federal government, it has been reported (see link above), is “targeting schools that refuse to comply with Mrs. Obama’s lunch rules.”
So, the Worst Lady, whom no one voted for, who has never been appointed to or confirmed in any official position, and who is accountable to absolutely no one, has been given the power to decide what food shall be served to millions of children in America’s public schools.
How delightfully Third World of us!
It’s covered with a facade of legislation, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act–and who would dare vote against a bill with a name like that?
Naturally, as is only to be expected of anything done by this administration, the kids are now hungrier than ever because they don’t like Obama-fare and refuse to eat it.
Had enough yet, anybody?
There are at least 10,000 reasons not to send your kids to public school, and here’s one of them–the food is awful ( http://eagnews.org/thanksmichelleobama-school-resumes-students-begin-posting-skimpy-lunches/ ).
Yep, the new menus suck every bit as much as last year’s. This is thanks to the 2010 Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act–honestly, if you were in Congress, would you dare vote against kiddies being healthy and hunger-free?–which gives Worst Lady Michelle Obama, whom no one voted for, a way to get involved in what other people’s children eat.
Bear in mind there is nothing intrinsically wrong with this food, and that it is a sin to waste it. The problem is, it’s just not food that any normal kid would eat. I wouldn’t choose to eat it, either. And when they give a big fat wing-ding at the White House, paid for by the hapless American public, you can bet your eyes they don’t serve any of this stuff.
When they’re not busy renaming major geographical features, cramming illegal aliens into the country, and making confetti of the Constitution, the pair in the White House like to poke their noses into everybody’s private business.
But don’t take my word for it. Click the link and see the pictures of what will confront America’s public school children when their summer furlough is over.
Would you eat it?