Facebook Exec: ‘Break It Up!’

Opinion: Zuckerberg stands defiant on political ads, swinging 'free  expression' at critics like a hammer - MarketWatch

What’s wrong with this picture?

(Thanks to Susan for the nooze tip)

Do you think Facebook–and the other social media giants–is too big, and much too powerful?

That’s what Benny Thomas thinks; and he’s Facebook’s “Global Planning Lead” (whatever that is, exactly). They’ve got him saying so in front of a hidden camera planted by Project Veritas (https://populist.press/facebook-executive-sounds-alarm-zucks-ai-will-destroy-human-race/). There’s video embedded in the article, if you want to listen to the whole interview.

“Nobody in the history of the world has been the ruler of 2 billion people,” says Thomas; “but Mark Zuckerberg [Facebook CEO] is.” “There is a dire need for government intervention” to rein in Facebook. In fact, he says, “Break it up. The government should break it up.”

Governments are not exactly easy in their minds about the power of Big Tech and its social media. When Twitter banned the president of the United States, other world leaders–even ones who didn’t particularly like our president–got to thinking, “Gee, if they can do it to Donald Trump, they can certainly do it to me!” So there are stirrings in Europe: leaders trying to figure out how to put the breaks on Big Tech.

The Big Tech conglomerates, Benny Thomas says, “are not companies anymore. They’re countries.” And probably more powerful than countries.

Warning! Globalism and Chinese communism are now fused together in a cooperative effort to rule the world. Their agent in America is the Democrat Party.

Someone, like Hezekiah, should take the globalist plans and spread them out on the altar of the Lord, that He might see them. Really, who knows what to do, to stop the wave of tyranny? Who has the power to stop it?

God knows.

And I think I hear Him saying, “Don’t make me come down there!”

YouTube Cancels Skepticism About COVID Vaccines

"Inquisition" (Stargate Atlantis) » GateWorld

“Consensus” can get out of hand

One by one, Big Tech is canceling from the social media anyone who raises questions about the safety or efficacy, or even the morality, of the new COVID-19 vaccines. The censorship campaign was launched late last year.

From YouTube we get this: It “would now ban any content with claims about COVID-19 vaccines that contradict consensus from local authorities or the World Health Organization” (https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-youtube-int/youtube-bans-coronavirus-vaccine-misinformation-idUSKBN26Z21R). And just like that, “consensus” is elevated to the status of an idol, and the World Health Organization to an absolute authority that cannot be questioned. Never mind that it’s an arm of the abjectly corrupt United Nations.

And legitimate concerns and questions about the vaccines are equated with daft quackery and unhinged conspiracy theories. But in truth, you can question the COVID-19 vaccines without rejecting tried and successful vaccines for, say, polio or smallpox. Questioning does not turn you into a wild-eyed “anti-vaccine” conspiracy nut.

What do you get when you mix science with politics? You get… politics!

When I studied Political Science in college, politics was defined as “the authoritative allocation of value.” The key word there is “authoritative.” It includes the “authority” of brute force, coercion, and shouting down dissent.

And what is “consensus”? It’s nothing more than what everybody, or practically everybody, thinks at the time. “Consensus” doesn’t have to be true, and all too often, it isn’t. The experts can be wrong. The power brokers can be wrong. That’s why real science, an endangered species, always leaves the door open for further questions. But the tough guys with the keys to the jailhouse don’t want to hear any questions.

This is not how honest men and women behave. Whenever “science” relies exclusively on consensus, it isn’t science anymore. It’s only politics.

I don’t have the scientific background to ask penetrating questions about the vaccines. But I do know enough about politics to question the capacity and the motivations of the persons who are pushing the vaccines.

And those are questions that everybody needs to ask.

They Mean to Control Us–and That’s No Joke

Amazon.com: The Tyranny of Big Tech (9781684512393): Hawley, Josh: Books

Senator Hawley’s caught on to them, too.

It’s a dynamic of history in a fallen world that there’s always some crazy fool, or a mad nation, or an international gang of megalomaniacs who want to rule the whole thing–or at least a much bigger piece of it than they’re entitled to. Today’s would-be tyrants may be found among the oligarchs of Big Tech.

I want to share with you a quote from an article by Allum Bokhari, senior technology  correspondent at Breitbart News, published in Vol. 50, No. 1, January 2021, of Imprimus. The author was interviewing a Facebook “source,” and this is what the source said.

“We have thousands of people on the platform who have gone from far right to center in the past year, so we can build a model from those people and try to make everyone else on the right follow the same path.

Wait a minute–did he say “make them“? As in adults making their children go to bed? Why, yes, he did–he said “make them.”

Dude! Who are you to make anybody do anything? Do you Big Tech willies actually aspire to make us think a certain way, and say and believe and do certain things?

We are up against an oligarchy that aims to control our thoughts and our behavior. They really think they can do it. After all, they stole a national election. What can’t they do?

Our system of government is fantastically corrupt, the corruption is global in scope, the politicians are in bed with Big Tech, and they mean to take away our liberty–take away our very souls, if they can swing it. They don’t believe in souls, anyway. They’ll settle for being our slave-masters.

We have no defense left but our prayers; but the God to whom we pray is all-righteous, all-powerful–and He doesn’t like obnoxious little hipsters who want to take His job.

Deliver us out of their hands, O Lord our God! In Jesus’ name, Amen.

Good News! Poland to Fine Big Tech Censors

Image result for images of banning twitter

How about that? They did what they said they were going to do!

Poland now has a law against the social media censoring conservatives–they won’t be allowed “to remove content for political purposes” (https://www.foxnews.com/world/poland-fights-big-tech-push-block-social-media-censorship).

And if they do… the fine will be a whopping $13.5 million. For every offense.

Polish authorities cited Twitter’s ban of President Donald Trump as “a dangerous precedent.” Well, sure–if they can do it to the president of the United States, they can do it to anybody.

And how’s this for hypocrisy? In India, the Prime Minister threatened to ban Twitter unless they banned his critics! And so, of course, they did–500 of ’em.

This whole business of allowing “private corporations” to do things to people that government is not allowed to do–it’s fascism, and it has to stop. No more using banks and Big Tech to do the dirty work that Congress wouldn’t dare.

Once again, Poland is leading the way back to sanity. Hats off to Poland!

China’s ‘Social Credit’ System: Coming to America?

See the source image

Is your score high enough to allow you to eat at  decent restaurant?

How would you like to be punished for something without even knowing what it was, without a trial, without a chance to defend yourself, without even a chance to say anything about it? And because the punishment is not administered by the legal system, there’s no way to appeal it, no way to get it lifted.

Welcome to Red China’s “social credit” system. There, Big Tech closely monitors everything that everybody says and does and helps the government “rate” citizens according to their “trustworthiness”… as defined by the government. You run up points for doing things the government likes for you to do; and if your score is too low, you can’t shop at the nicer stores, can’t sent your kids to a nice school, can’t hold a good job, can’t travel on a plane, can’t ride the choo-choo train.

Here, Big Tech’s mouth is watering as they dream up ways to impose a similar system on the increasingly less “free” world (https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/08/26/fast-company-silicon-valley-is-building-a-communist-style-social-credit-system/).

Some of the big corporations–banks, insurance companies, Facebook, Uber, and Lyft, and even Amazon–are already rating their customers, and some are banning people for having “wrong” opinions. (Note: I got banned by Facebook yesterday.) Say the wrong thing on the social media, and maybe next time you need a ride from Uber, the algorithm will say you can’t have one.

This is a liberal’s dream come true. Why go to all the trouble of passing a law against Climbit Change Denial, and maybe have a judge just strike it down, when Big Tech is ready, willing, and able to do your dirty work for you? And your victim won’t be able to go to court and get his punishment lifted. You don’t even have to tell him why he’s being punished.

Remember a book called Beyond Freedom and Dignity by B.F. Skinner, vintage 1971? Freedom and dignity, argued the father of behavior modification theory, are outdated and “unscientific,” obstacles to a utopia designed by Scientists and the kind of government that’ll kill you as soon as look at you.

“Social credit” is behavior mod for the entire country, administered by private entities without the consent of the governed–but certainly with a sly wink from the Democrats.

Please! Do not, under any circumstances, vote for any Democrat anywhere! Next year is our chance to put them out of business… before they put our country out of business.

 

Caught! Google Wants to Control the Next Election

See the source image

They want to pull our strings…

Project Veritas, maybe the last investigative reporters in America, has caught Google trying to hatch a plan to prevent “another Trump situation” in 2020 (https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/06/24/insider-blows-whistle-exec-reveals-google-plan-to-prevent-trump-situation-in-2020-on-hidden-cam/).

Now, to understand this story, you have to understand the Far Left Crazy mind-set. They wanted Hillary to be president, and therefor you should have, too. If you didn’t, it can only be because you’re a villain or a fool and no one has to listen to you and your vote shouldn’t count. And they are entitled to do anything, absolutely anything, to get the election outcome that they want.

Veritas has a Google exec on videotape saying Google is committed to “never letting someone like Donald Trump come to power again.” Asked about Far Left Democrat Elizabeth Warren’s call for Google to be broken  up because it’s too big (even a broken clock is right twice a day), the executive said that would be a big mistake because smaller companies “don’t have the resources” to prevent Mr. Trump’s re-election–whereas Google and the rest of Big Tech are “working diligently to prevent” it.

Have we taken a wrong turn into South America in the 1950s? Down there they used to call this kind of thing an imposicion–literally, “imposing” a regime upon the people, usually against their will.

“People like us are programmed,” boasted the exec, proud of something that ought to be a source of shame. The goal, she said, is to have “a single point of truth” across their entire line of protects. That would be Far Left “truth,” of course. The exec admitted that Google suppresses “right-wing content.” “Right-wing” would be anyone who isn’t them.

Has this now gone far enough for you? Do we really want a cabal of grotty little people slipping Bernie Sanders under the door of the White House?

Yo, Congress! This has indeed gone far enough. Break up these self-proclaimed opinion-shapers, break their stranglehold on political discussion, don’t let them do this stuff next year. Make them take their dirty hands off our elections.

Don’t make us see to it ourselves. We know you’re not afraid of us; but you’d better learn to be, if you want to stay in office.