Dem Platform Committee: Prosecute ‘Climate Change Deniers’

Image result for images of angry hillary clinton

If you’re even thinking about allowing another Democrat, ever again, to be president, please stop it at once.

A few days ago the Democrat platform drafting committee voted unanimously to have the Dept. of “Justice” prosecute individuals and organizations for being skeptical of that ultimate lib faith statement, Man-Made Climate Change. Yup, they wish to outlaw an opinion. They’ll start with going after energy companies and “corporations,” but they also have their eyes on conservative think tanks and dissenting scientists ( http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2016/06/democratic-party-platform-to-call-for-prosecution-of-climate-change-deniers-3155271.html ).

And if you folks permit Hillary “Cash” Clinton to become president, this wildly flagrant violation of the First Amendment–its virtual repeal, for all practical purposes, will be upheld, 5-4, by a Supreme Court wherein the late Justice Scalia will have been replaced by some commie chosen by the Democrats.

It’s this simple, everybody. Either Trump defeats Clinton, or you lose your First Amendment rights.

Because you don’t think they’ll stop there, do you?

 

Feds Ease Up on Order to Schools to Go Transgender

Oops! They went a tiny bit too far, too fast, and now the Obama administration has to throttle back on its “order” to public schools in America to let boys into the girls’ bathrooms or else: so instead of an order, now it’s just a “letter of guidance” from the Justice Dept.–what???–and the Dept. of Education ( http://abcnews.go.com/US/obama-administration-public-schools-transgender-students-access-bathrooms/story?id=39081956 ).

Remember when the Justice Dept. used to go after guys like Al Capone? Now they go after people who are a bit slow to hop aboard the transgender express.

The “letter of guidance” admonishes schools to allow any kid to use any bathroom according to his, her, or its “gender identification,” which is to be whatever the student says it is on any given day. It comes with a veiled threat to cut off federal funds to any school district that won’t let the boys stand over the girls while they pee.

Excuse me? Did I just hear you say you weren’t going to vote for Donald Trump, or you just won’t vote at all, and you don’t care if Hillary Clinton is elected president?

Remember what not voting for Romney (warts and all) got you.

Is Trump an ‘Unmitigated Disaster’?

I don’t like to disagree with Thomas Sowell. He’s a brilliant man whom I respect, and I’ve never had to disagree with him before. I do it now with some trepidation.

Today, in his townhall.com commentary, Dr. Sowell called the emergence of Donald Trump as the likely Republican presidential nominee “an unmitigated disaster” for the GOP, for the country, and probably even for the world ( http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2016/05/06/an-unmitigated-disaster-n2158652 ). Gee, he’s that bad?

Sowell flayed Trump for his “unending reckless and irresponsible statements” and wound up hoping that some third party candidate would rise up strong enough to prevent either Trump or Hillary Clinton from winning, throwing the election into the House of Representatives and maybe winding up awarding the White House to someone, anyone, better than Trump or Clinton.

But for the time being, we face a very simple, however distasteful, proposition. We don’t really know what Trump would do as president; but I think we do know what Hillary Clinton would do, and God forbid she gets the chance to do it. In her case we are talking about a left-wing ideologue with a solid track record of criminality. So we are asked to choose between opening a door to a swarm of killer bees that will certainly fly out and sting us to death, or opening a door to the unknown. How hard a choice is that?

The American people are in this situation because we are governed by a political class, backed by academics and unions and movie stars, that has all but destroyed the country. That’s why Trump won all those primaries. That’s why millions of people are prepared to vote for him.

Dr. Sowell does not want Hillary Clinton to be president. That would indeed be an unmitigated disaster.

But until further notice, the only alternative is Donald Trump.

Thailand Bans ‘Rude Opinions’

In a move calculated to drive American college professors and other Democrats absolutely wild with jealousy, Thailand’s military junta has banned “rude opinions” and virtually all known forms of political discussion, in the run-up to a referendum on a new constitution promoted by the junta ( http://www.voanews.com/content/thailand-bans-rude-opinions-ahead-of-crucial-referendum/3313020.html ).

“Why, why, why can’t we do this!” cried U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

“What unscientific wimps we are!” lamented Bill Nye The Science Guy. “We can’t even jail Climate Change deniers!”

It is rumored that Hillary Clinton has threatened to go on a hunger strike if a set of rules similar to Thailand’s is not immediately adopted by America.

Under Thailand’s new rules, you can’t campaign against the proposed constitution, you can’t campaign for it, you can’t use any language that could possibly be described as intimidating, aggressive, or impolite, you can’t organize a panel discussion to debate the issue, and you’d better watch what you post on the Internet. Violation of any of these rules could get you 10 years in jail.

Ms. Lynch had to be restrained from beating her head against the Justice Dept. wall.

Democrat primary candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders said, “Of course we can have those rules here in America! In fact, we already do! Just check out any college campus.”

“I counsel the America people to just be patient,” said President *Batteries Not Included. “We’re not there yet, where Thailand is, but we’re getting there–and we won’t stop until we do.”

Hillary’s Secret Weapon–the Felon Vote

I hardly know how to report this.

The governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe, a long-time Clinton henchman, has issued an executive order restoring voting rights to 206,000 “ex-felons” (convicted, served time in prison, and now out of prison) just in time to boost Hillary Clinton’s chances in this year’s presidential election ( http://www.richmond.com/news/virginia/government-politics/article_771db279-34d6-5a3d-9557-a417a8afb212.html ).

But wait, there’s more! The convicted robbers, rapists, and murderers will also be able to serve on juries… and hold public office. Gee, it’d be funny if it weren’t true.

The only right they don’t get back is their right to legally purchase and own guns–not that they ever paid much attention to gun laws anyway. Like, that’s how a lot of ’em wound up in jail in the first place.

Hmmm… What will politicians have to promise jailbirds, from now on, to get their vote?

So what’s next, Democrats? Full voting rights for felons who are still in prison?

I mean, what does it say about a candidate, when she needs the votes of robbers, rapists, and murderers to get elected?

Historically, Virginia has restored civic rights to ex-felons on an individual basis–which seems fair and rational to me. If some safecracker has done his time, paid his debt to society, and can demonstrate that he really and truly has gone straight, it’s not unreasonable to give him back his voting rights. At least it’s something reasonable people can debate civilly.

But this?

On top of it all, McAuliffe insults our intelligence by dressing this contemptible political ploy in glad rags of civil rights and equity. Like, dude, we was all wrong to throw this guy in jail just because he robbed a couple of liquor stores and shot somebody…

Just when you think our nation’s leaders have hit bottom, you are reminded once again that, where they are concerned, there is no bottom.

P.S.–In the interests of truth and accuracy, I must add that in 38 states and the District of Columbia, felons’ voting rights are automatically restored upon completion of a felon’s prison sentence ( http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/felon-voting-rights.aspx ). So Virginia was exceptional in that regard.

That being said… Restoring felons’ voting rights now, on the eve of an election, for the blatantly obvious purpose of helping a particular candidate, stinks on toast.

I am Confused (About This Election)

I suppose in the end it will be obvious: vote for whoever the Republicans nominate, or else get Hillary and kiss America goodbye. Unless she gets indicted first.

I think we have been here before.

First I was for Cruz, then for Trump, and now it’s I dunno. There’s something about the Cruz campaign that makes me uneasy. As for Trump, how is that anything but a crap shoot?

I was for Cruz because I thought he was a real conservative, if there is such a thing anywhere in our political class. I was for Trump because I passionately detest the Republican Party leadership and want to see it kicked down the stairs. But in the meantime, the partisans of both Cruz and Trump are tearing down each other’s candidate so badly that it may not be possible to repair the damage in time to keep Mrs. Bloody Awful out of the White House.

I have a soft spot for Ben Carson, but, gee–now he wants to do away with the Electoral College, the only thing that keeps the country from being ruled forever by a couple of Democrat machines in large, incredibly corrupt cities in a handful of states. Anyhow, he’s not running anymore.

O Lord my God, if you’re thinking of intervening in America’s national life just about now, I think it’d be a very good time for you to do so.

NJ Man Faces Jail–for Flying ‘Trump Flag’

Here’s a lawn sign you can have in New Jersey without the cops hassling you and Democrats trying to throw you into jail.

My home state of New Jersey takes a back seat to no one, when it comes to tyrannical liberals trampling people into the dust.

There’s a guy in Long Branch who could be sent to jail for 90 days for flying a Donald Trump campaign flag… on his own property ( http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/New-Jersey-Homeowner-Cited-Flying-Donald-Trump-Campaign-Flag-Too-Early-374982211.html ). But we already know what the state of New Jersey thinks of private property rights.

There’s a law that says you can’t put up a sign for a political campaign more than 30 days before an election.

But surely you can fly the ol’ Transgender flag, or the homosexual Rainbow flag, or the Cuban Castro flag, or the North Korean flag, etc., 365 days a year, no questions asked.

In New Jersey and other Democrat hellholes, “free speech” means you’re always free to agree with liberals. Period. Anything else, you’d better watch your mouth.

Here in my home town there’s a doofus who put up his “Bernie” sign (Bernie Sanders the socialist nut case for president) a good five months ago, at least–well in advance of our June-something primary election. And there have been a few Hillary signs, too.

I dunno–is it a safe space issue? Are college students writing our laws, these days?

You’re always free to support Democrats.

Our Dominatrix-in-Chief

Millions of people will vote for this woman to be president. God help us.

As distasteful as it is to me to break in upon the Sabbath with news–in fact, I prefer to take no notice of it–I’ve decided to break my own rule today in case they  pull the story and pretend it never happened.

It has come to this. Hillary Clinton, representing millions of American voters, recently spoke before a gathering of assorted sodomites, pledging to fight for “transgender rights,” God help us, and poncing around in a leather outfit of a kind reminiscent of the bondage and discipline scene ( http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3520688/Leather-clad-Clinton-jokes-fashion-icon-vows-fight-transgender-rights-boasts-defeat-Trump-LGBT-event.html ).

Soon, I think,  we’ll be told that this is only propaganda, of course Hillary didn’t appear in leather in front of all those… those people. Never happened!

So we have a presidential candidate pandering to a crowd of people whose common bond is their devotion to practices condemned in God’s word as major sin, universally condemned by virtually the whole human race until this present deplorable era in our history, and promising to advance their interests.

May God remember that these things are done without our consent, against our will, and over our objections.

Meanwhile, I get the distinct impression that He’s baling up our country and making ready to put it out on the curb.

Hillery Wil Give My Fambly What For!!

Ha ha that stopid lee he is riding his byke so now i got his blogg and yiu al wil get some wise interllectural geyedence for a change!

Hey do yiu kno what hapened to me yeastadday? My Grandma she shot me!!! OK it was onle with a pelett gun but it stil hurt! She went out and baut it jist so she culd shoot me with it, she was in the car leenin out the winder wile my Grandpa he drove and thay follered me al round the Campus untill i got “away”! And i told the Campus Cops but thay didnt beleave me.

Now a lot of ordrinary dum peple thay dont unnerstand why we got to have al Safe Space al over collidge; wel, this is why, yuor stopid fambly is why! Affter you ben in collidge for a wile yuor fambly gets jellase and then thay reely Hate it wehn yiu becolm a interllectural and yiu so much Smarter than them! Like Grandma and Grandpa thay so dum, thare wasnt no Gender Studies wehn thay was yung and so thay hates me becose I be so mutch Smarter then thay is.

And my Prefesser he explaned it all, That’s “why Hillery she said” It takes a Villidge to raze a Child “and” yuor Fambly thay can onely do it bad. Yiu wate till she is Pressadint and then yur stopid fambly thay Wil get whats coming to them! And aslo he Said my Grand Parents thay probly jellice of my moth antenners. Yes that Exspearmint with the Moth Hormoans it still goin on. Exsept i feel kind of Funny with it being spring, and i am hungry for socks and hankerchiffs all the time.

Miracle? Has a Clinton Spoken Something That Was Not a Lie?

Campaigning for his wife, former horndog President Bill Clinton lashed out at “the awful legacy of the past eight years” ( http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bill-clinton-awful-legacy-8-years ).

Normally if a liberal accidentally tells the truth, he levitates three feet off the ground, his head spins 360 degrees, and smoke comes out of his mouth.  In shock and awe, noozies remarked that Clinton “appeared to be” criticizing President Barack “I Love You, Castro” Obama. But some of them quickly convinced themselves it was only a slip of the tongue (heh-heh), and what the accused rapist was really doing was slamming the Republican Congress, which did not exist for the first two years of the community organizer’s presidency.

What’s goin’ on here? Mrs. Horndog faces an indictment or two, the FBI is poring over her documents–is Mr. Horndog trying to get her thrown in jail? Or have they been privately informed that yes, there really will be indictments coming right up, and Willie’s outburst was a genuine temper flareup?

And wouldn’t it be absolutely wonderful if our two major political parties totally destroyed themselves?