The Loving Left: She Mocks Aborted Babies

See the source image

Goya saw this coming, and painted it…

Leftid comic genius Sarah Silverman wowed ’em on TV a few nights ago by saying, “If anything has ever made me want to eat an aborted fetus, it’s this law” (https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2018/02/1061687-sarah-silverman-goes-off-deep-end-says-new-pro-life-law-makes-her-want-to-eat-aborted-fetus/), referring to a 2012 law that bans the use of aborted baby parts as food or drink ingredients.

You don’t have to be Dante (or Goya) to be able to imagine what she’ll be doing in the afterlife.

The, uh, comic also took aim at another law requiring cremation of aborted babies, instead of just chucking them in a bin. Revel in her sage commentary: “F___ing funerals for f___ing aborted fetuses?” She went on to mock the size and undeveloped intellectual capabilities of a fetus. The pot calling the kettle black.

She wrapped it up with this: “Religious freedom used to be such a beautiful thing… and now it’s just this shroud to legalize hate and s___ like that.” Didn’t Spinoza say that once?

Isn’t it just wonderful, the way entertainment (cough, cough!) celebrities know all there is to know about everything? Such fine and delicate sentiment! Such crisp and scintillating wit!

Well, I keep telling you there’s no one as anti-human as a humanist. And leftids are the biggest hate merchants around.

 

Forcing You to Go to College???

See the source image

(Thanks to Linda for the news tip.)

I was going to wait till I calmed down a bit before I commented on this, but I think that might take too long.

New Mexico is considering legislation to force every high school student to apply to at least one college as a requirement for graduation (https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2018/02/02/new-mexico-could-be-first-state-to-force-students-to-apply-for-college/).

This is, of course, nothing more than a jobs program for “educators.” And it’s bipartisan! That means it’s good, right? Like, the Evil Party and the Nothing Party have actually gotten together to sponsor this, so how could it be wrong?

This really is the limit.

Uh, what if you don’t want to go to college? What if you want to do something useful with your life–like, for instance, become a skilled auto mechanic–instead of sitting in a classroom “learning” about White Privilege?

This is only further evidence of how deeply our governing class despises us and just can’t stop gnawing at our liberties.

For crying out loud! There are already too many colleges and looniversities, too many overpaid and over-pensioned educators, and way, way, way too many young people going to college and having their minds turned into mush! We need to defund and shrink the bloated absurdity called “higher education,” not expand it even more.

This is a shameful and preposterous proposal, and it must be defeated.

‘The Deranged Liberal Quote of the Week’ (2015)

Are these people quite all there? Get a load of this prize sample of intellectual wool-gathering.

The Deranged Liberal Quote of the Week

Scientific Study (LOL) Says Conservatives are Better-Looking then Liberals

Even in 1952, Science had the answers

Hey! No nasty cracks about Maxine Waters or Michael Moore!

A “scientific study”–please remember that Science has all the answers–finds that conservatives tend to be physically more beautiful than liberals (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/01/10/conservatives-really-are-better-looking-research-says/?utm_term=.8701dc6041c9). “Numerous studies have shown that Colgate is an effective decay-preventive dentifrice–” oops! Wrong study.

“Numerous studies have shown that good-looking people are more likely to earn more, and that people who earn more are typically more opposed to redistribution policies, like the progressive taxes and welfare programs favored by the left.” Boooo! Hiss! Good-looking people are just naturally mean and selfish! Ugly people are so much nicer. Just ask any scientist.

Other “numerous studies” find that “the more attractive people believe themselves to be, the lower their preference for egalitarianism, a value typically associated with the political left.” How selfish can you get! Imagine, not wanting to punish someone for working hard and achieving something by grabbing his money and doling it out to ne’er-do-wells who sit around and play video games all day–but keeping most of it for the government.

Sorry: but to me, “egalitarianism,” at least when promoted by leftids, looks a lot like envy. It looks like one crab trying to climb out of the  basket and the others pulling him back.

The Washington Post concludes, “[L]ife is easier for those who have won the genetic lottery.”

But see, that’s why we need an all-powerful government with huge bureaucracies, so they can make everybody like totally equal and identical despite life’s lottery, because the genetic lottery isn’t fair, goldarnit,  and yeah, sure, they’ll have to break a few hundred million eggs as they try to make the omelet… but it’s gonna turn out fantastically great like we can’t even describe to you, so please just take Comrade Schumer’s word for it–”

I know some of you out there believe this bilge.

And shame on you.

‘Wacko Feminist Wants to Put All Men in Camps’ (2015)

Remember this? Or has so much crapola come down the pike of late that individual items just get washed away?

What do you want to be the #MeToo movement winds up going there? (Sorry, but I turn away from anything that has a hashtag in front of it.)

Wacko Feminist Wants to ‘Put All Men in Camps’

Now It’s Sandwiches Causing Global Warming

See the source image

Sigh. Now it’s our sandwiches causing Global Warming. We’re doomed!

According to the University of Manchester–you can always count on universities for stuff like this–the creation and consumption of sandwiches is equivalent to the “carbon emissions of 8.6 million cars in Britain alone” (https://newatlas.com/sandwiches-global-warming/53128/).

Oh, when, oh, when will we have a world government to control and forbid our self-destructive lust for sandwiches!

Meanwhile, a lot of us are freezing our kiesters off this winter–but hey, it’s Global Warming that causes cold weather, right? I mean, Al Gore says so, so it must be true.

And doesn’t breathing contribute to Global Warming, too? Like, can’t we do something about that? Like not breathe anymore?

Are Males Doomed?

See the source image

Oh, feminists are gonna be dancing in the streets over this!

According to some scientists–and remember, Science is always right!–writing in the science journal, Conversation, the Y-chromosome, which males have and females don’t, is “rapidly disappearing” (http://www.catchnews.com/world-news/hold-your-breath-y-chromosomes-on-verge-of-getting-extinct-what-will-happen-to-men-96239.html).

At the rate it’s going, the Y-chromosome’s days are numbered. For all practical purposes, say the scientists, it will be gone, adios, goodbye… in 46 million years.

Ulp!

Gee, I guess, whatever we’re thinking about getting done, we’d better get done! Like, the clock is ticking! Oh, the scientists say life will find a way and probably generate “male fetuses without Y-chromosomes,” but how can they be sure of that? We are men, and Evolution’s gonna punch our ticket!

Probably to fix us for all that bad stuff we do.

When the initial feminist euphoria wears off, after the first 500,000 man-less years or so, that’s when the second thoughts will set in. After kajillions of years blaming men for everything, who they gonna blame now? Like, won’t it be so embarrassing if a women-only world doesn’t turn out to be paradise? What if there are still wars, still poverty and inequality, and people–well, only women and girls–being mean to each other?

Maybe feminists somehow skipped childhood. They show no sign of even suspecting what sorts of things girls in middle school get up to.  Some of them would be feeding each other ground glass if you didn’t watch them closely. Maybe the Elizabeth Bathory Chapter of NOW needs a refresher course in reality.

So us guys are going extinct and then, gals, you’ll be on your own, no one left to blame for anything that goes wrong.

What could be a more dire fate for feminists than to get what they say they want?

Ohio State… vs. ‘White Hetero Masculinity’

See the source image

If you despise your children and enjoy wasting money, send them to Ohio State and encourage them to take a new “course” that seeks to batter down “white heterosexual masculinity,” presuming they can still find any on the campus (https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/40991/).

If “white heterosexual masculinity” is bad, then what do you suppose they would hold up to us as good?

No, they’re not answering any questions about it. Just sign the tuition checks and shut up.

The required textbook in the course is Dude, You’re a Fag! All the readings seem to be centered on persuading normal men to become sodomites. The whole shebang is called “a study in feminist masculinity.” I wonder what kind of twaddle you’d get if you held an essay contest on “What is feminist masculinity?”

The course will be taught by a “doctoral candidate” in the Dept. of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. This loser has also written a children’s book encouraging children to be homosexuals.

Hint: If a college has a Dept. of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, that college has too much money, way too many employees, and too many “students” who should be working jobs instead of sitting in classrooms “studying” toxic garbage

Get a Load of This

See the source image

I just can’t stand it anymore.

Try this on for towering idiocy. The governing body of the city of Stamford, Connecticut, a 40-member Board of Representatives, has voted to get rid of “gender pronouns” like he/she, his/her, in all written regulations, etc., pertaining to members of the board (http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Connecticut-city-s-elected-body-eliminates-gender-12487367.php).

Why?

“It’s an act to acknowledge the members of the board… cannot always be described as he or she.”

Which brings to mind a line from Ray Bradbury’s classic little horror story, The Jar: “Is it a he, is it a she, or just a plain old it?”

What kind of driveling dolts are they electing in that town?

Posterity will laugh at us for this.

Racer Begs Forgiveness for Saying Boys Don’t Wear Dresses

See the source image

Formula One racing driver Lewis Hamilton is groveling and begging for forgiveness after recently tweeting that “Boys don’t wear dresses” (https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/lewis-hamilton-apologizes-for-saying-boys-dont-wear-princess-dresses/). The boy in question was his three-year-old nephew, whose dotard parents put him in a princess dress for Christmas.

We seem to be marooned on Abomination Island.

Of course, an army of trolls piled onto Hamilton for his comment, quickly motivating him to reverse course. So now it’s “I love that my nephew feels free–” the kid is only three years old–“to express himself as we all should.” Really? As we all should? You want to think that over for a minute, buster?

Grovel, grovel. “Nice, nice hobbitses, my precious! Let usss live a little longer, gollum-gollum!” All right, what he really said was “My deepest apologies” and “I hope I can be forgiven–” by who?–“for this lapse in judgment.” It only sounds like Gollum.

He also admitted to the shiny new thought crime of “gender shaming.” Wait’ll the Canadian “human rights” commissions get hold of that one.

I am exceedingly reluctant to believe that the vast majority of people in the Western world today have come around whole-heartedly, and damned near instantly, to a full embrace of the Transgender mythology. After all, the social media makes it possible for two nuts to appear to be a thousand, if they’ve got the time and motivation for it. So maybe Mr. Hamilton is licking dust for just a little handful of kooks who made him think he’d incurred the wrath of multitudes.

My uncles, bless them, are dead. But I like to think they would have protected me, if my parents went tranny hog-wild with me when I was only three years old.