Curses, Foiled Again! No Sea Level Rise for New York, Washington D.C.

Don’t you hate it when you make scary, melodramatic scientific predictions, and wait for the big bucks to come rolling in–and then your prognostications turn out to be totally, hopelessly wrong?

How many “climate scientists” have sought to wow their audiences with claims like “New York gonna be the new Atlantis! Only the Government can save us”? The Government advised by ourselves, of course.

Now we find that since 2009, sea levels at New York City and Washington, D.C.–which were supposed to go up, up, up because we stubbornly refuse to live like medieval peasants–have, in fact… gone down ( https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/05/29/the-sea-levels-are-now-reducing-in-the-hotspots-of-acceleration-of-washington-and-new-york/ ). And of course, if you look at the graphs over time, you can easily see that sea levels are always fluctuating–subject as they are to countless influences, some of them so subtle that we have yet to detect them.

So again it’s boo-hoo to the Global Warming crew: take a long walk off a short pier, and hope there’s still water under it. I would say “pray” instead of hope, but I have no idea what you guys pray to, and probably don’t want to know.

Jail for ‘Climate Change Deniers’–the Ball’s Already Rolling

ndhile Thailand makes “rude opinions” against the law, American Democrats have gone beyond just talking about doing it.

The attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands is the latest–would you believe it? they’re all Democrats–member of our “gangster government,” as George Will puts it ( http://www.newsmax.com/GeorgeWill/climate-change-deniers/2016/04/24/id/725453/ ), to accuse ExxonMobil, along with a couple of conservative think tanks, of the new crime of “Climate Change Denial.” This brings the total to 17–all Democrats–state attorneys general trying to make it against the law to disbelieve in Man-Made Global Warming.

They also allege that anyone who voices disbelief in Man-Made Global Warming is only doing it because he’s been paid under the table by Big Oil.

Now, if Exxon’s defense attorneys are worth anything, there is an ocean of evidence out there that they could subpoena, proving beyond even an unreasonable doubt that the real racketeers in this case are not the oil companies, but the gangster government and its pet “climate scientists.” They could start with the Climategate emails and work their way up to NOAA, NASA, the IPCC, and several other government agencies caught lying and cheating. There’s even a peer-reviewed scientific paper–albeit denounced by any number of scientists–saying it’s perfectly ethical to lie and cheat as long as it gets the public to do what you want it to do.

Nevertheless, be advised: They’re not just talking about it anymore. Democrats are actually trying to outlaw an opinion.

The First Amendment: R.I.P.

Libs Still Plotting to Jail ‘Climate Change’ Dissenters

Here we go again: libs–that is, Democrat state attorneys general (no Republicans) and other low forms of life–trying to win the “Climate Change” argument by jailing anyone who doesn’t believe in man-made Global Warming ( http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/17/democratic-ags-climate-change-groups-colluded-on-p/ ).

Here we have Democrats, aka foaming-at-the-mouth communist wannabes, trying to stifle free speech. It’s the only way they can attempt to stifle free thought. If you’re not allowed to say it, why bother thinking it? You might even lose the ability to think it.

Please try to imagine the enormity of the crime they contemplate.

In any contentious, controversial issue of public concern, they propose to silence a dissenting opinion by using the legal apparatus of the state to crush it.

In what sense, other than a totally loopy one, can the First Amendment be said to have any meaning, if this is what they do?

The nearest and most deadly threat to our civil liberties is not posed by Islamic jihad fanatics. If we only had the stomach for it, we could swat them down like bugs.

The worst threat to our liberties is our public officials and our leaders. Al-Qaeda has no power to void our Bill of Rights. But as you can see from the news story above, our own home-grown Dems are out to do that very thing.

 

TV ‘Science Guy’: Jail the Skeptics

Just in case you thought it was suddenly safe to use your brain for anything more complicated than blocking the wind from blowing through your ears, along comes Bill Nye the Science Guy (with his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering), sage and oracle, calling for prison time for those whose “extreme doubt” of Global Warming/Climate Change is “affecting my quality of life as a public citizen” ( http://www.newsmax.com/US/bill-nye-climate-change-jail/2016/04/14/id/724050/ ).

Nye joins fellow fat-head Robt. Kennedy Jr. in proposing jail time as the appropriate response to skepticism vis-a-vis “Climate Change.” Hey, hey, gotta Save the Planet, no halfway measures will do! And our fascist Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, and a number of Democrat (of course) U.S. Senators. “Yo, watch us win an argument! We’ll just throw the other side in jail!”

Remember when there used to be this thing called “reason,” and these other things called “facts,” which were supposed to be used to persuade people that this or that was right or wrong, true or false? Well, they don’t need that stuff anymore. Taking a leaf from “President” Obama’s book, they have turned to communism to “just use what works”–in this case, brute force ruthlessly applied by persons with no more morals than a bucket of mud.

Don’t forget–most of these are the same chowderheads who are always howling about there already being too many people in jail for actual criminal offenses.

Oh, well–spring the rapists, armed robbers, women-beaters, and the rest of ’em, and you’ll have plenty of prison space for Climate Change Deniers. With room left over for those who refuse to celebrate Gay Marriage.

May God  cut off this evil suddenly.

 

Jale Them Climbit Change Deneyers!!

Ha, that stopid guy is out riding his bike so i got his blog, and i am a interllectural in Collidge so I can explane stuff that you ordrinary peple is not smart enuojhgt to undderstand.

So I say Congradurlations to our Tourney General Loreta Lunch for lookin for a way to prossacute anyboddy who deneyes Climbit Change, they has al got to go to Jale and Loreta Lunch is goin to find a waye to do it! Thay say maybe she can get this guy named Rico to go affter them, i dont kno his last name but he must be plenty smart!

Like whare to these hear peple get off, not beleavin in Climbit Change, and who do thay think thay are! Whare dose it say yiu got a rihgjt not to beleave in Climbit Change? My prefesser he is even smarter than me and He sayes the “First Amen-ment its” got to go becose its no good any more and peple is jist sayin things thay got no rihjgt to say and yuo Specally cant say nothin bad abuot Climbit Change!

So yiu jist wate till Hillery Is Pressadint and then al them deneyers she goin to Round them “up” and put them in Jale and she wil aslo fix anyboddy else what sayes anything bad and no body wil be aloud to say Wrong Things no more!

P.S. somboddy jist told me that Rico he is named Rico Petroselly and he uset to play base ball for the Red Socks but now he is a big Prossacuter for the Govermint. Wel i wuldnt kno abuot that, i dont follaw base ball but may be i wil now that Rico is goin to get rid of the Climbit Change Deneyers.

When Irresistible Humbug Meets Immovable Crapola

One more news story for today, and then I’ve got to go wrap my head in duct tape before it explodes.

The National Science Foundation has spent more than $400,000 for a “scientific paper” by a loony professor at the University of Oregon, in which persons who study melting glaciers are exhorted to take “a feminist political ecology and feminist postcolonial approach” to the scientific study of glacial melt ( http://blurbrain.com/400k-study-global-warming-feminism-glaciers/ ).

What does any of that garbage mean?

It means we, the stupid taxpayers, are out the money.

Go ahead, I dare you–tell me “This is science” and try to defend it.

Scientists Say It’s OK to Lie for Climate Change

In April of 2014, two scientists published a peer-reviewed article in a scientific journal in which they stated that it’s perfectly acceptable to lie about “climate change” if it can get people to behave as scientists want them to behave ( http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/24/ajae.aau001.abstract ).

Don’t believe me? Fine. This is from the introduction to the article in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, by Fuhai Hong and Xianjian Zhen:

“In fact, our key result–that overpessimism alleviates the underparticipation problem–implies that the propaganda of climate skepticism–” Note that it’s the skeptics who are doing propaganda, not the confessed liars themselves–“may be detrimental to the society.” Dig those crazy euphemisms.

Another quote: “[A] rationale for the phenomenon of climate change accentuation or exaggeration [that is, lying] on the part of the international mainstream media…”–they are counting on the nooze media being in cahoots with scientists who exaggerate the effects of climate change–“… exaggeration of climate damage [that is, lying] may alleviate the problem of insufficient IEA [International Environmental Agreements] participation.”

So there you have it–scientists saying it’s okay to lie about “climate change” (known as Global Warming when the weather is hot) if the lies can be used to trick people into signing on to International Environmental Agreements.

At the time there were a number of scientists who denounced this paper in no uncertain terms. But when we hear a scientist preach about the need for tighter government controls on our behavior, because they’re needed to Save The Planet, how are we supposed to know which scientists are truth-tellers and which ones are liars?

General Principle to Follow: If a proposed policy or action will have the effect of increasing the wealth and power enjoyed by politicians and/or scientists who have already established themselves as liars and cheaters, such a policy or action should be immediately rejected.

P.S.: My friend the homicide detective says cases often solve themselves without him having to do much detecting. How? “The bad guys can’t help blabbing about what they did,” he explains. “If they don’t brag about it to some other convict, they’ll just burst. And then the other convict rats ’em out.”

Here we have the Climate Change bad guys bragging and ratting themselves out.

Save the Planet by Laundering Your Toilet Paper

The Obama administration has granted $750 billion (that’s billion with a b) to a company that is developing a way to wash toilet paper so that it can be used again.

“There’s no such thing as too high a price when you’re fighting Climate Change,” said White House spokesman Slick Gullimoffin. “Anyhow, it won’t cost you a cent unless you’re white.” The project, he explained, will be paid for by a new White Privilege tax of 70% on all income.

“We are tremendously excited by the early trials of this product,” said U.S. Dept. of Energy Secretary Humbold Screwtape. “Heretofore, laundering your toilet paper has always been a difficult proposition. I mean, like, it would always fall apart when it got wet!

“But now, thanks to a new process developed by The Clinton Foundation, you can actually hand-wash your toilet paper in the kitchen sink, and it only takes about 20 minutes per sheet.”

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Jezebel Shagrat pointed to an added benefit. “Once we move all the common people into Agenda 21 housing, you won’t have closet space for a lot of rolls of toilet paper. But for just a couple of hours’ labor a day, you can have all the toilet paper you need.”

Asked precisely how washing toilet paper was going to Save the Planet, Mr. Gullimoffin ruled that such a question was disrespectful to the office of the president and had White House guards take the questioner outside and shoot him.

Jackalope Captured Alive!

H

Here’s the proof we’ve all been waiting for! The jackalope is real!

As you can see by the photo–and pictures don’t lie–a skillful net hunter in Whatsit Creek, Michigan, managed to scoop up a healthy specimen of the horned rabbit. Ah! you say. “But what did he do with it?”

Well, he wanted to catch another one and breed them, but this first jackalope got away when the net broke a few minutes later.

According to modern Science, jackalopes are a product of Global Warming, homophobia, and Income Inequality. And unless taxes are raised dramatically, we are told, jackalopes will soon take over the world.

But I don’t believe that part of the story.

‘Scientific Research Fraud on the Rise’

Hi, everybody! It’s me, the Cardiff Giant, the 19th century’s most famous scientific fraud.

There ain’t a lot to do, just being a museum exhibit, so I like to follow the progress of 21st century scientific fraud. Did you know there’s a study that shows that bogus scientific papers have become almost ten times more common than they were in the 1970s ( http://www.cbsnews.com/news/study-scientific-research-fraud-on-the-rise/ )?

And remember–that doesn’t count the ones that get away with fraud. These are just the ones that got caught and had to be retracted by the publisher.

I love you folks who say, “Well, they still have a long way to go before they top the Cardiff Giant!” But the fact is, when it comes to scientific fraud, I ain’t fit to run errands for the grand-daddy of ’em all–Global Warming (Climate Change, when the weather’s cold).

Y’know, when I got exposed as a humbug, interest in me kinda dried up and blew away. But by now, even though it’s been thoroughly exposed, Global Warming is still alive and kicking. I guess that’s because world leaders like it. Me, I was just the poor old Cardiff Giant. They never had me over to the White House.