From what I’ve read of the sermon, the rev and I seem to agree on some of its most salient points. “Of one blood” God made all the peoples of the earth. The Tower of Babel was a symbol of world government by unrighteous human beings. But it’s the rev’s party, not mine, and he, not me, who’s playing racial politics.
He will face Republican Kelly Loeffler in a Jan. 5 runoff, unless she’s withdrawn to some secluded place to repent any worship of whiteness she might have once indulged in.
If “whiteness” is so bad, what about all that “Black” stuff the Left is so high on lately? Oh–that’s good? Well, I admitted I don’t get it.
Democrats think voter fraud has bagged them the presidency. Now they hope it’ll win them the Senate. And then, in Sen. “Che” Schumer’s words, we can “really change America.”
If this travesty of an election is allowed to stand, we will see a great deal more of this wicked foolishness in our colleges and universities. They will not get better. They will get worse. Worse even than this.
If there ever was an institution fanatically devoted to the destruction of the society that created it, fed it, and made it grow, that institution is “higher education.” But then leftids have turned all our institutions against us, haven’t they?
So Kamala Harris, whose qualifications for the job are, well, nothing, has suspended her quest for the Democrat presidential nomination. Never mind that she was polling a red-hot 2 percent. Never mind that she’d already spent about 130 percent of her campaign budget.
Yep. According to Leah Greenberg, a self-proclaimed poobah of #theResistance–translation: a non-entity–it would be “catastrophic” for the Party to have an “all-white male” debate, never mind that Corey “Spartacus” Booker and that doofus Castro will still be there: but never mind. “The implicit racism and sexism of ‘electability’ is deeply damaging to democracy,” she babbles.
I don’t know. Wouldn’t it be infinitely more damaging to just about everything, if Kamala actually became our president?
But for a leftid worm-brain, the only thing that matters is the externals. Character counts for nothing. Ability counts for nothing. Fitness for the office counts for nothing. You want to give somebody the authority to sign or veto legislation, to launch missiles, to negotiate with foreign leaders, to be the leader in shaping public policy–you do? Okay! Just remember that the main considerations are that person’s sex (nyah, nyah, I won’t say “gender”!) and skin pigmentation. She can be a psychotic evil numbskull, but as long as she’s a Woman Of Color, that’s all us activists are interested in.
I can’t imagine what a liberal thinks the president is. Or ought to be. But surely the very last items on the list should be sex and color. Those characteristics are entirely irrelevant.
“I don’t care who does my heart surgery–it just has to be a Woman Of Color! it doesn’t matter that she doesn’t know how! The only thing that matters is Justice! Social Justice!”
Whenever a lib speaks the word “justice,” you know he’s just snuck the dried pea out from under the walnut shell. Now there’s nothing under any of the shells. That’s leftism. In a nutshell, as it were.
I rather think that if I ever said something like, “Oh, no, I can’t read that book–it’s written by a black person,” most people would think there was something wrong with me. But if you balk at reading anything written by a white person–well, your college is very anxious for you to continue paying tuition, so anything goes.
I’d like to know why anti-white hate isn’t “hate”. I’d like to know why liberals praise and foster it. And I’d really like to know what kind of horse’s ass of a parent sends his or her child to such a school.
Yes, the big, big stupid nooze media, the Washington Post and the New York Times, joined together in deploring the 50th anniversary of the Apollo moon landing, suggesting that it… well, it doesn’t count! Three white men on the spacecraft, no trannies, no gays, no disabled persons, no women of color (how much room do they think there was in that landing module?)–so it doesn’t count.
Washington Post: “The culture that put men on the moon was intense, fun, family-unfriendly, and mostly white and male.”
New York Times: “The Apollo program was designed by men, for men.”
Whoa, back up? “Family-unfriendly”? This from the same people who want to abort babies as they’re being born? Who want to turn all the girls into fake boys and all the boys into fake girls?
And I could’ve sworn that when those three guys landed on the moon and walked on it, not only did all America stand up and cheer, but a pretty good chunk of the world cheered with us.
“No! You can’t cheer because the astronauts are white and you’re not!”
What kind of wicked nonsense is that?
In that it tirelessly labors to divide people into groups based on external characteristics, and to stir up these groups to hate and fear each other, liberalism is an altogether satanic enterprise and must be defeated and destroyed. Forever.
If only so we can go back to celebrating the three guys who landed on the moon.
If you want to see real, live, piping-hot racism, don’t bother trying to dig up a KKK rally. Just make a beeline for your nearest college or looniversity. Or don’t even get up from the couch: just click on the nooze and listen to any Democrat.
Race-baiting is a sin; but “progressives” hope to use it to take control of America.
This hear It “:is” caled a Rachel Shaiming Dinnner, and thay say “”As a whyte wimmin in Amarica you Are a Actave Praticipent in Upholstering Wite Supremacity”” how do you like That!! And aslo thay are Racists no mater watt thay “say” “Or” do!!!
Thare is somb boddy she is ogranyzing this she is A Ratial Jutstus Actavist and wee wood Love “for” her “to” come hear to our Collidge and has a diner hear but she dont know ware it is and be sides witch we Cant Wayt!!! So we wil has the diner our selfs and maik al the Whyte Wimmins come to it and get yeled At!!!
Somb boddy on our Stodent Soviet thay Assked watt wee shood “surve” for diner becose “it shoodnt be too nice or thay Wil not Cry enuohgh!!!””
This hear “is” wat i Love abote Collidge we “are” alyaws in the Four Front of evvry kynde of Socile Jutstus and we get to yelll at lots “Of” peple and cal themb Racists and Biggits and Naimes!!!! And if we Keeep “this” “up” befour yiu know It thare will Bee Ratial Jutstus evrryware!!!!!! And than evvry boddy thay will reely Lyke Eech Oather or else wee wil punnish themb But “Good”!”
In 1973 James Earl Jones played the title role in King Lear in the New York Shakespeare Festival. Lear, a pre-Roman British king and the central figure in Shakespeare’s tragedy, was white. James Earl Jones is black. To which the world very rightly said, “So what!” There must have been someone saying he shouldn’t play the role because he’s not the right color, but whoever it was, didn’t get much traction.
So now we’ve got a bunch of left-wing pipsqueaks that I never heard of, because I have better things to do than pay attention to them, yowling about “colorism.” That is a word I never heard until this morning. Something new to complain about! You can’t beat leftids for inventing new things to complain about. They don’t think Will Smith is black enough to play Mr. Williams. We are warned there’s gonna be “a social justice backlash.”
If this kind of racial nitpicking isn’t racism, then what is it–pure and idle brainlessness?
The Colorado “Civil Rights” Commission aren’t the only ones trying to dictate the content of works of art.